Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Mephansteras]

I don't have you listed as voting right now, so I'll assume I missed something at some point.

The Corrected Whiteboard
Criptfeind : Org
Ethereal.Frog : Jim Groovester
forsaken1111 : Nuke9.13, Jokerman-EXE, Pandarsenic, Solifuge, webadict
Jim Groovester : Toaster
Org : JanusTwoFace
Ottofar : ToonyMan
Solifuge : Ethereal.Frog, forsaken1111, Mr. Person, Ottofar
Toaster : Leafsnail
webadict : Criptfeind


General rule: Paranormal has only one condition that effects who's voting who, and that's the Mind Control Ray. If you haven't been mind controlled, then I've simply missed something or added a vote to the wrong line in my spreadsheet.

[Mr.Person]

I JUST unvoted Solifuge and voted Forsaken. Talk about missing lines on a spreadsheet.

[webadict]

I don't recall you ever stating why I was scum. How will you convince the vigilante to kill me without reasons? He won't follow your suggestion because you're personable.

I know! How indeed...

Oh well. I guess I'll just see what happens.

It's like you're playing both side of the field at once. The fact that the defense comes later is odd. And it's not a paradigm shift until I vote forsaken1111, where YOU ask for reasons. That's not something you should be worrying about. No that's something forsaken and I are discussing. Then, I accuse Jim Groovester, and you decide, "Hey, you know what? I have no one else to vote, so I'll vote you, WUBA."

Let me show you my thought process here.

1: You vote Otto with no explanation. I say something quick in a questioning way but really chock it up to RVT.
2: You vote Forsaken with no explanation. This one I take objection too and ask your reasoning.
3: You call Jim scum with no explanation. Now I vote you because you still have not explained Forsaken and so you go on to... pointedly ignore me. I try to get you to talk but you never do. You only recently explained somewhat Forsaken but Jim you never did really. Not only that but when talking to me you lie and twist my words around. I have no reason to unvote you so I have not.

Maybe if you answer a question once in a while I would unvote you.

Lets start with why did you say Jim was scum. Not what he is doing now but back when you first accused him.

I truly don't understand why answering is so hard for you.

Also Mod? It seems in the last two vote counts my vote on web was not there, is that a mistake?

Because Jim Groovester had the secondmost number of scumpoints. He nearly scored a scum touchdown.

[Mephansteras]

Bah, work is obviously distracting me too much.


The Whiteboard
Criptfeind : Org
Ethereal.Frog : Jim Groovester
forsaken1111 : Nuke9.13, Jokerman-EXE, Mr. Person, Pandarsenic, Solifuge, webadict
Jim Groovester : Toaster
Org : JanusTwoFace
Ottofar : ToonyMan
Solifuge : Ethereal.Frog, forsaken1111, Ottofar
Toaster : Leafsnail
webadict : Criptfeind

[Leafsnail]

Man, I'm not reading back over all that bullshit.

Webadict has created a lot of pointless noise, and as far as I can tell he led the town away from someone scummy (Toaster) towards someone whose play he didn't like (forsaken).  He has no case at all against forsaken... it's a policy lynch, and not even a good policy lynch.

The worst part is that webadict is obviously town.  At this rate, he's pretty much gonna wreck the game for us.

[Ottofar]

I don't think forsaken is scum. If he doesn't react on questionless RV by insulting webadict, he must be scum, is pretty bad reasoning, but he should've reacted after the third vote.

Webadict, on the other hand, seems to be spreading WIFOM, (assuming I understood the term correctly) which I find scummy. Besides, he must be asked to answer questions multiple times, and he still might not answer.

Solifuge's opening makes me still vote for him.

[Jim Groovester]

Unvote.

Since my vote won't have an effect on the lynch, I can freely vote webadict for being evasive.

Vote stays on you until you answer. Out with it, punk.

[webadict]

Unvote.

Since my vote won't have an effect on the lynch, I can freely vote webadict for being evasive.

Vote stays on you until you answer. Out with it, punk.

By that logic, I can freely avoid answering your question, since it won't have an effect on the lynch, right? Stupidest answer ever, since you're not trying to lead a lynch on Ethereal nor find evidence of his scummitude, but you have plenty of time to semi-random vote me to find why I find you to be scummy.

And it wasn't even until you were having a problem with being shot in the face tonight that you started going after me, presumably because you believe I have the power to do that to you, in which case you'd WANT me gone so that I could not do that to you. Right?

And instead of directing the attention of said Vigilante to a scummy player (The one you were previously voting, perhaps), you have instead resorted to pointing me out, for no reason other than I said you were scum (I didn't even vote you, so why should you care? If I were leading a lynch on you, it'd be worse, right?)

So, what about that?

[Ottofar]

By the way, When did Org last post?

[Jim Groovester]

So, what about that?

What about what? You still haven't answered the question.

[webadict]

So, what about that?

What about what? You still haven't answered the question.

I answered a question. You just have to switch articles and it works.

[NUKE9.13]

I'm beyond caring at this point. You're all taken in by web when all I did was not care about his random vote.

Why should I care? It was a random vote with no reason given. Apparently not caring is scummy.

It doesn't matter. Have fun. I'll catch the next game.

This is funny. Every sentence of this quote is made of wrong. 

"I'm beyond caring at this point."-If, at any point in a mafia game, you are beyond caring, you are screwing it up for the rest of the players. We don't care if you are having a few boo-boos. That is not an excuse to ruin the game for us.
"You're all taken in by web when all I did was not care about his random vote."-Actually, only pandar cared slightly about your self-admitted lack of response. The rest of us care that you refused to respond to pandar's vote, and all that followed.
"Why should I care?"-Because you joined the game, inherently agreeing to play it. And caring is part of playing.
"It was a random vote with no reason given."-It was not random, it was normal 'Wuba' playstyle. He has his reasons, which he doesn't give, to get more telling responses. Or soemthing. It wasn't random, anyway, and there was no reason on purpose- it does not detract from its validity.
"Apparently not caring is scummy."-Leave out the sarcasm and this line is 100% correct.
"It doesn't matter."-It does matter. Your refusal to defend yourself has lowered your team's chances, and made the game generally less enjoyable.
"Have fun"-Says he, having just actively detracted from our capability to do so.
"I'll catch the next game."-You should not be allowed to join future mafia games with this behaviour.
[/meta]

Webadict is acting like webadict. That is, infuriatingly cryptic. I cannot see it as particularly scum webadict; but one never knows.

With the forsaken situation, ethereal frog has gotten a second chance to explain himself, and I would like him to do so.

...the rest of you, carry on.

[Jim Groovester]

What about what? You still haven't answered the question.

I answered a question. You just have to switch articles and it works.

And how about the one I asked you?

The same one criptfeind asked you.

With the forsaken situation, ethereal frog has gotten a second chance to explain himself, and I would like him to do so.

Hey, I've got an idea.

Ethereal.Frog, get your sorry ass in here and remind everybody why they should be lynching you. Comment!

[Leafsnail]

Webadict is town.  That much is pretty much assured.

And he's apparently gonna shoot Jim tonight, someone who looks equally town.

Quite frankly, I'm beginning to lose hope for this game.

[Criptfeind]

1: Why is this hard for web to answer a simple question?

2: Why is nuke putting (Somewhat stealthily) somewhere in almost every post of his that I should not push web for being unhelpful?

Webadict is town.  That much is pretty much assured.

Why?