Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Solifuge]

I'm not opposed to an ethereal.Frog lynch, since at least Forsaken1111 has at least been present (if about equally helpful, and conspicuous).

Still, I wager Mr. Frog is suffering more from the N00bonic Plague, and would rather give him Day 1 to shape up, or shuff off this mortal coil.

[Jim Groovester]

Yeah, I'm sure he's suffering from the n00bonic plague too (nice one, by the way), but even if he is town he's still said too many scummy things to ignore, and he seems to have no intention of shaping up his game at all.

He's the scummiest player right now, and I don't like that you and others are ignoring Ethereal.Frog to go lynch somebody for a pissing match he has with webadict every game.

[webadict]

Well, since you asked, I would much prefer an Ethereal.Frog lynch. After him, Toaster. Those are my two top suspicions.

Resorting to newbs, huh?

[NUKE9.13]

Forsaken, that (voting solifuge) looks really bad. Really, really bad. Whilst ethereal.frog may be just a bumbling noob, you have at least a modicum of experience, so you cannot get away with that sort of thing.

Forsaken1111

Your arguments are weak:
1:Why not?
2:What scummy behaviour? Are you referring to Mr.Person's suspicions? Why did you not mention you agree with them before?
3:You consider them both equally scummy? Seriously? You think that a weird RVS strategy is as scummy as admitting to blatant bandwaggoning, joking about how 'new' you are, and 'giving up'?
4:Admittedly; but does the possibility really negate enough of his scumminess that you consider Solifuge a better target? Also, if you didn't want a tie, and thought solifuge was more scummy, why didn't you switch your vote earlier?
5:Um. What? That is what I would call a 'vivid metaphor'.
6:Because.... You don't want to die, so you are attempting a last-ditch, badly argued, irrational vote switch to save your freaky dopp skin? Actually, that is a pretty good reason. To lynch you.

[Jim Groovester]

Well, since you asked, I would much prefer an Ethereal.Frog lynch. After him, Toaster. Those are my two top suspicions.

Resorting to newbs, huh?

Nope.

They are suspicious. They should be lynched. Today, preferably.

[webadict]

Well, since you asked, I would much prefer an Ethereal.Frog lynch. After him, Toaster. Those are my two top suspicions.

Resorting to newbs, huh?

Nope.

They are suspicious. They should be lynched. Today, preferably.

Well, I know who's gunna be gunned down togun.

Hint: you.

[NUKE9.13]

...wut

[Jim Groovester]

Well, I know who's gunna be gunned down togun.

Hint: you.

Are you subtly suggesting that the vigilante should target me tonight?

It appears we have mutual feelings towards each other.

[ToonyMan]

OK, I just need to say, you people are being really bitter, just wow.

Ottofar,
Where are you little buddy?  Ever since last time I posted I don't recall you posting once.

The topic of Forsaken,
The "meh" attitude to being voted on is not an avenue I would go by, it's essentially the polar opposite of an over reaction (like Ottofar).  It makes you seem like you don't care for the game and not trying to do a town tell because you aren't freaking out or something.

Webadict,
Death threats are oh so fun oh ho ho ho NO.

My vote remains on Ottofar until he reacts to the situation we have presently.

[webadict]

Well, I know who's gunna be gunned down togun.

Hint: you.

Are you subtly suggesting that the vigilante should target me tonight?

It appears we have mutual feelings towards each other.

What?! When did I subtly imply the Vigilante should shoot you so you'll be dead from being shot by the VIGILANTE, resulting in your death. From being shot. By the Vigilante.

I don't believe I ever subtly implied that the Vigilante should SHOOT Jim anywhere in that. Seems you just really want to be shot for some reason. Perhaps by a vigilant fellow wielding a gun. JIM.

[Jim Groovester]

I don't recall you ever stating why I was scum. How will you convince the vigilante to kill me without reasons? He won't follow your suggestion because you're personable.

[Mephansteras]

The Whiteboard
Criptfeind : Org
Ethereal.Frog : Jim Groovester
forsaken1111 : Nuke9.13, Jokerman-EXE, Pandarsenic, Solifuge, webadict
Jim Groovester : Toaster
Org : JanusTwoFace
Ottofar : ToonyMan
Solifuge : Ethereal.Frog, forsaken1111, Mr. Person, Ottofar
Toaster : Leafsnail


Day ends ~5pm Pacific Today

[Mr.Person]

First off, I'd like to unvote. I haven't been sleeping much (I stayed up all night playing Civ 4. Twice.) so I wasn't thinking straight. I've realized that the reason I was voting Solifuge wasn't because he was acting scummy, it was because we were arguing and I wanted to win. It's actually pretty bad, I'm surprised nobody called me on my bullshit, or if anybody did, I don't remember, but you get a cookie (I think Solifuge called me on it, surprised he didn't push anything). I've done this before, argue with someone and call them scum because we disagree. So yeah, Solifuge's method of RVS is incorrect and should never be repeated ever under any circustances, blah blah blah. Ok. Whatever, it's 2009!

That may be true, but it doesn't help find scum. Like Forsaken.

You seemed to have no interest in Solifuge before, yet suddenly you think he's uberscum? And it's not like Solifuge DID anything to appear scummy, you only brought up old-ish points to make your case. So if you really thought Solifuge was scum, you'd have made a case on him already. I also think you lack any real grasp of what made Solifuge scummy. Your point is VERY nondescript, and you haven't mentioned at all why you think Ethereal.Frog is scum. You're barely trying. So I highly doubt you seriously think Solifuge or EF is scum. And since only scum can't seriously think another player is scum, you must be scum. I would say go die in a fire, but I think Webadict covered that to death, so instead I'll just say 'Don't let the door hit you on the ass on your way out!"

[forsaken1111]

I'm beyond caring at this point. You're all taken in by web when all I did was not care about his random vote.

Why should I care? It was a random vote with no reason given. Apparently not caring is scummy.

It doesn't matter. Have fun. I'll catch the next game.

[Criptfeind]

It's like you're playing both side of the field at once. The fact that the defense comes later is odd. And it's not a paradigm shift until I vote forsaken1111, where YOU ask for reasons. That's not something you should be worrying about. No that's something forsaken and I are discussing. Then, I accuse Jim Groovester, and you decide, "Hey, you know what? I have no one else to vote, so I'll vote you, WUBA."

Let me show you my thought process here.

1: You vote Otto with no explanation. I say something quick in a questioning way but really chock it up to RVT.
2: You vote Forsaken with no explanation. This one I take objection too and ask your reasoning.
3: You call Jim scum with no explanation. Now I vote you because you still have not explained Forsaken and so you go on to... pointedly ignore me. I try to get you to talk but you never do. You only recently explained somewhat Forsaken but Jim you never did really. Not only that but when talking to me you lie and twist my words around. I have no reason to unvote you so I have not.

Maybe if you answer a question once in a while I would unvote you.

Lets start with why did you say Jim was scum. Not what he is doing now but back when you first accused him.

I truly don't understand why answering is so hard for you.

Also Mod? It seems in the last two vote counts my vote on web was not there, is that a mistake?