Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Jokerman-EXE]

Too much intuition where? I didn't know that was a bad thing, either, but show me evidence.

I wasn't buddying Org. I pointed to him as evidence in my case, that's it.

In the meantime, I still want to hear from Pandar. The more he talks, the more scumtells of his I can show the world.

[ToonyMan]

Intuition as in "feeling" this person is scum.  IE the people voting me

You're either rolefishing or trying to get him to name you a probable vig to eliminate.

Your questions, in order: You, the kill should've been you instead of Jim, and mu. The only meta off-kilter is die scum.

This isn't 27 and you're not Joe. You can't convince me by using anger and lots of passion without any kind of backing. Seriously, you're not even trying to convince anyone.

My vote stays. You're painfully scummy.

See bold and italic.

[Jokerman-EXE]

You think I'm scummy because I could tell that someone was acting scummy. Seriously.

Bullshit reasoning, Toony. Let's see something better out of you. What are you even voting Leafsnail for? Is it the same thing, or what? I haven't kept up on your argument with him.

Besides, did you even read the post he made that I quoted? It didn't even make logical sense. I felt like he was scummy and acted on it.

[ToonyMan]

You think I'm scummy because I could tell that someone was acting scummy. Seriously.

wut
All you said was that they were scummy, that's uhh...not anything dude.

Bullshit reasoning, Toony. Let's see something better out of you. What are you even voting Leafsnail for? Is it the same thing, or what? I haven't kept up on your argument with him.

wut
I just said why I was voting Leafsnail.

I hadn't heard from you in awhile and I wanted suspicions.  I thought I answered this before.  It also has evolved into the fact you OMGUS'ed me and now are being stupid scum with false logic.

You did the exact same "look he is scum" for the third time now as well.

Besides, did you even read the post he made that I quoted? It didn't even make logical sense. I felt like he was scummy and acted on it.

wut
You're telling me to read the quote and the quote is scummy, this is what I am talking about.  You can't do that, it's none of your own thinking besides drumroll.....intuition!

[Jokerman-EXE]

Yeah, I wanted an explanation of your vote, not you reposting it. Sorry if I was ambiguous.

You're doing the exact same intuition thing with Leafy right at this very second.

[ToonyMan]

I just explained it, wow.

1.  Wanted suspicions.
2.  OMGUS
3.  Scum logic

[Leafsnail]

I don't think forsaken is scum. If he doesn't react on questionless RV by insulting webadict, he must be scum, is pretty bad reasoning, but he should've reacted after the third vote.

Webadict, on the other hand, seems to be spreading WIFOM, (assuming I understood the term correctly) which I find scummy. Besides, he must be asked to answer questions multiple times, and he still might not answer.

Solifuge's opening makes me still vote for him.

Alright.  Unvote.

Vote Forsaken, I'm hating what you're doing right now.  Grit those teeth.

Read it.

ToonyMan is unvoting someone he had down as scum without reason, and changing to someone else without a proper attack.

No, he doesn't do this as town.

And I like the way you're crying OMGUS even though you basically random voted me this morning.  And you accuse me of being vague while saying I'm scum for "wanted suspicions"(?) and "Scum logic".

[ToonyMan]

I did have reasons for unvoting, Ottofar convinced me not only with reason, but I have a soft spot after poor Diakron's deaths who happened at the hand of me all the time, not to be offesne, but Ottofar is new just like Diakron.  Forsaken was doing a major scumtell for me as well with the defeatism.

I don't remember writing crying anywhere, but I called OMGUS because that was what you did.  Don't blame me for posting earlier, it's true to the fact they you did OMGUS me.

When someone wants suspicions they want who you feel is scum at the time, you gave one and that is me.  By scum logic I mean the fact that you are attacking me by just quoting me and saying, "look he is scum."  You finally managed to avoid that in this latest post, but I trumped you effortlessly.

[webadict]

Leafsnail, who else do you think is scum?

[Pandarsenic]

ಠ_ಠ

[ToonyMan]

ಠ_ಠ

Hey I remember you!  You're that guy that posts nothing in threads!  That's helpful!

[Pandarsenic]

Just keeping track of where I've read to. My current scum, Jokerman, hasn't posted recently and I've woken up too recently (yes, at 6) to trust myself to play mafia well until I've gotten dinnerbreakfast into me at the least.

[Jokerman-EXE]

Haven't posted recently? I've posted at least ten times, all containing relevant content (which I might add, you have failed to do) since the last time you logged in.

Stop trying to lurk. You haven't even read the thread, obviously. You're hoping everyone will forget you and forgive your lurking just because you have a shoddy excuse. I don't buy it. You're scum, lurking to win.

[Pandarsenic]

God damn it, mixed this and bay12mafia up.

This is why I don't trust myself to play Mafia tired.

And Toony, nothing wrong with intuition, that's how I get shit done D:

I just use it to locate people then provide actual reasons, unlike our "friend" here.

[JanusTwoface]

Hey Mephansteras, can we get a prod on Ethereal.Frog?  He hasn't posted in the forums at all since May 20 (some time during day 1).  If he's gone, could we get a replacement mayhaps?  (sigh for replacements)


Pandarsenic, you're lurking hard.  These are about all your posts of content (I use the term loosely) for the past game day:

Forsaken got what he earned.

Leafsnail, remind us why you were voting Toaster?

My intuition has something against Toaster but I'm too tired to slog through a reread right on five hours of sleep.

Comment on the dead, I disagree.  And then you first ask why Leafsnail was voting for Toaster just to go vote (close enough to make no difference) for him yourself.  Why?

Jokerman-EXE

And a vote almost completely without context... There was a Jokerman post before this but I posted between the two with 2 minutes for your new reply filter to catch it.

Looks like you voted Jokerman because he voted for webadict to apply pressure for his question (especially with your later post make only of a quote).

You're either rolefishing or trying to get him to name you a probable vig to eliminate.

Your questions, in order: You, the kill should've been you instead of Jim, and mu. The only meta off-kilter is die scum.

Are you quoting something in the second part?  Because you really don't make much sense.

Just keeping track of where I've read to. My current scum, Jokerman, hasn't posted recently and I've woken up too recently (yes, at 6) to trust myself to play mafia well until I've gotten dinnerbreakfast into me at the least.

Why do you even post then?  Just keep a tab open.  Or a sticky note.  It's like you're trying to prove that you're still around without actually posting anything.

God damn it, mixed this and bay12mafia up.

This is why I don't trust myself to play Mafia tired.

And Toony, nothing wrong with intuition, that's how I get shit done D:

I just use it to locate people then provide actual reasons, unlike our "friend" here.

You should get on that providing actual reasons part.  For Toaster if you still think he's scum.  For Jokerman if you have more than his vote on webadict.


On another note:

Pandar, what are you even voting me for?

As for the rest of you, I'm asking WUBA a question, and there's plenty of time for him to answer and my vote to move. So chill the fuck out. I think Org's the only one not jumping the gun to try and accuse me to cover himself, and that's because Org's...well, Org.

Sorry I am actually trying to get someone anti-town, I'll try to do better next time.

What does that actually mean Org?