Very tricky to do; since bridges have a 100-step delay for doing what a mechanism tells them to, and pressure plates have a 100-step delay between when the trigger stops and when the mechanism sends the "off" message, 200-step delays are more-or-less the minimum.
What you're going to have to do is make a "standard" repeater, then set it up so that the first trigger of it triggers a second repeater (so the second one triggers 100 steps after the first). The second repeater then has to trigger a third repeater (so the third one triggers 100 steps after the second), and the third to a fourth (so the fourth triggers 100 steps after the third). Put an inverter on the second and fourth repeaters, and link the first repeater and the inverters both to your bridge trap. Using 202-step repeater designs, you'll have a trigger/untrigger every ~101 steps, which is just what you want.
You need 4 repeaters because it'll go like this: Repeater 1 sends on message, bridges retract; 100 steps later, Inverter A (connected to Repeater 2) sends off message, bridges reappear; 100 steps later, Repeater 1 sends off message, which is ignored; ~5 steps later, Repeater 3 sends on message, bridges retract; 100 steps later, Inverter A sends on message, which is ignored; ~5 steps later, Inverter B (connected to Repeater 4) sends off message, bridges reappear; 100 steps later, Repeater 3 sends off message, which is ignored; ~5 steps later, Repeater 1 sends on message, bridges retract; then it should repeat from the beginning if I'm not making any mistakes, which I probably am.
Fewer repeaters will end up not having the bridges trigger and untrigger regularly; they'll have both 100-step and 200-step intervals. You might only need 3 repeaters, though... regardless, you'll need more than 1 and/or a complicated mechanical- or fluid-logic computing system to figure the whole thing out.