Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[ToonyMan]

I'm going to unvote Zako and put Cheeetar in defense position.

[Jokerman-EXE]

Aha, you've activated my trap card!

...by which I mean, you were already voting for Cheeetar. What's up with you forgetting that, Toony?

[ToonyMan]

I want to vote him twice anyway.

[Jokerman-EXE]

Luckily I have a Spell Card for that!

...by which I mean that that's against the rules.

[ToonyMan]

Then I will say I forgot I was voting Cheeetar again (I don't remember voting him) and will say something along the lines of, "Cheeetar deserves both votes!" or something.

I'll vote Jim, yeah.

[Jim Groovester]

ToonyMan, why are you trying to tie webadict and Cheeetar for second position in the ring?

That's incredibly scummy.

Just what I'd expect from M/P-ASSIVE SCUMFACE TOONYMAN.

[ToonyMan]

I'll extend the day then.

[Leafsnail]

The Hopefully Final Votecount:

ToonyMan: Org, Jim Groovester
webadict: Jim Groovester, GeneralGuy, Cheeetar, Solifuge
GeneralGuy: tehstefan, Org, Jokerman-EXE, webadict, Solifuge
Cheeetar: webadict, Mr.Person, ToonyMan
Zako: Jokerman-EXE
Solifuge: Pandarsenic, Zako
Pandarsenic: GeneralGuy
tehstefan: Mr.Person
Jim Groovester: ToonyMan

Votes left over: tehstefan, Zako, Cheeetar

Extension: Pandarsenic, ToonyMan
Objections to extension: Jokerman-EXE

Two more extension requests with no objections required.

Deadline today at somewhere around 10PM GMT.

Bear in mind we'll go into an assist phase, not a nightphase.

[ToonyMan]

ToonyMan, why are you trying to tie webadict and Cheeetar for second position in the ring?

I couldn't cause a tie between those two...

[Mr.Person]

Alright, screw this. Guys: We're going to lynch Webadict. This is a thing that's going to happen. We're going to lynch Webadict. If he turns out town (hint: he's scum) we're going to lynch me, because a town as skilled as Webadict would never be wrong about who scum is. I don't want Webadict to wriggle out of being lynched, so: We're going to lynch Webadict. You who believe Webadict: Lynching him will confirm him and gain the lynch of me afterwards, and since I'm so obviously scum by Webadict's arguments ("He's obvscum guys. He's obvscum for voting for me, and also because he's obvscum."), that will mean 1 scum death.

We lynch Webadict, he's town. We lynch me. 1 town, 1 scum dead.
We lynch Webadict, he's scum (HE IS). 1 scum dead.

Easy.

Smart townies don't do this. It's retarded. If you're right, that's nice, but if you're wrong, you've just told everyone to lynch you. Not the brightest of ideas. So either you're scum bussing Webadict (that'd be a major swerve), scum thinking townie Webadict's not actually going to get lynched today, or scum trying your damndest to get townie Webadict lynched regardless of the cost.

That's not even mentioning that when he said this, Webadict was ALREADY going into the ring. So if he was town, there was NO NEED to say something like this. None, zilch, nada. So obviously this was a gambit, and only scum do gambits.

Unvote Zako.

What I want now is for Webadict to be lynched. Any votes for people other than Webadict will increase the possibility that they will be put in the ring instead of Webadict. I don't care who goes in as long as Webadict goes in, because if Webadict goes in then we can lynch Webadict.

Just ignore the fact there's more than one scum and this makes sense!

Webadict and GeneralGuy

By all means, don't say why you're voting them and ignore my question. Unvote tehstefan, vote Solifuge

ToonyMan, why are you trying to tie webadict and Cheeetar for second position in the ring?

That's incredibly scummy.

And what would be scummy about trying to tie Cheeetar and Webadict?

[Solifuge]

I've come to notice two different philosophies when it comes to Mafia.

There are players who speak from their personal perspective, based on what they know and observe. They vote based on intuition, observation, and deductive reasoning.

Then there are players who act from a position of self-proclaimed authority, often citing "Experienced Mafia Players", Classic Scumtells and Gambits, and Wikis, etc. They take little observations, and use inductive reasoning to make broad generalizations about individuals and behaviors. They tend to demand things of other players, and make up an arbitrary series of systems and rules which they expect everyone to adhear to.

Of the two, the later are immensely less helpful, and  more annoying. Undeserving Self-Importance is one of the few things that makes me angry at people.

[Solifuge]

...that said, Mr.Person, what was your question? I couldn't pick it out of the vast sea of crap that's been flung back and forth.

[Jim Groovester]

ToonyMan, why are you trying to tie webadict and Cheeetar for second position in the ring?

I couldn't cause a tie between those two...

But you were trying to. And that's the important thing.

Trying to save your scumbudsman from the ring, huh? Yeah, I know you were. It's pretty obvious.

ToonyMan, why are you trying to tie webadict and Cheeetar for second position in the ring?

That's incredibly scummy.

And what would be scummy about trying to tie Cheeetar and Webadict?

When I strongly believe that one of them is town, the other scum, and the person trying to tie also scum, it looks like an attempt by ToonyMan to get webadict out of the ring.

Is it just me or is there a lot of bullshit coming out of Mr. Person's mouth? That's what it looks like to me.

Mr. Person, for major bullshit, and ignoring my question. The one about Cheeetar, so you don't spew more bullshit asking about where it was.

[Mr.Person]

What are you talking about? I just explained why I'm voting Cheeetar.

[ToonyMan]

I can't vote two people Jim, I had no intention.