Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[ToonyMan]

No, I placed it right after someone else did to make the pressure mean more, it makes more sense in context.

[Pandarsenic]

You mean these posts?

Unvote Wubadict and Org, vote Solifuge.

I'll pick out a second later but Solifuge is looking like a decent bet as a scumface so far.

The two posts I quoted. The first one he refers to some "at least 1" unknown "slip-up", and promptly votes Zako and... Wubadict?

Upon having the fact that those two haven't argued at all pointed out, he...

WIFOM'd like a madman, pointed out that Zako used the Toony Tunnel (on purpose or accidentally [should we still use that name now that Toony rarely does it?]), and... insists that Wubadict and Zako were arguing, instead of, y'know, agreeing about Jim Groovester?

He's voting those two without regards to reality, at all, whatsoever.

Hell, I haven't placed my second vote and OMGUSing GeneralGuy (or more accurately, going along with the obvtown who thinks he's scum) can't go totally wrong.

Yes, being completely wrong about what Solifuge was saying and going along with webadict are excellent reasons to vote people.

Unvote tehstefan. Pandarsenic, unless he has more to add about his votes.

I'm sorry, I can't hear you over how right I am.

[Jim Groovester]

No, I placed it right after someone else did to make the pressure mean more, it makes more sense in context.

But why can't you do your own pressure votes on people you think are scummy? Because right now you're just letting everybody else do your work for you. Which is passive, and doesn't seem like town ToonyMan's regular behavior.

I'm sorry, I can't hear you over how right I am.

If you are unwilling to explain your votes at others' request then I will enjoy voting you.

[Pandarsenic]

Or, y'know, my votes are already explained and any further explanation would be wasted on you.

[Mr.Person]

Or, y'know, my votes are already explained and any further explanation would be wasted on you.

Just quote them then.

[Jim Groovester]

Or, y'know, my votes are already explained and any further explanation would be wasted on you.

I want further clarification because I think your reasons are crap. If your reasons aren't crap, then you should clarify them for me.

This is not an unreasonable request. Your defiant attitude helps nobody. It makes me think you know that your reasons are crap and don't want them critiqued.

[Pandarsenic]

http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=57012.msg1279310#msg1279310
and
http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=57012.msg1279349#msg1279349

That is Solifuge's defiant refusal to acknowledge reality.

GeneralGuy started foaming at the mouth and Wubadict voted him so I went "Hell, why not?" I've seen nothing from him that made me believe that he's town (i.e. scumhunting, reasonable defense) so my vote is staying on him.

[Jim Groovester]

Unvote Pandarsenic.

How is Solifuge in that post not acknowledging reality? He said both webadict and Zako were arguing. Later he mentioned that they were indeed arguing, but not with each other, but with others.

A subtle distinction, one that Solifuge no doubt is insufferably proud of, and one that he explained. Did you not catch it, or did you ignore it?

Now that I've got a free vote, ToonyMan for being a passive scumface.

[Cheeetar]

Unvote Zako.

What I want now is for Webadict to be lynched. Any votes for people other than Webadict will increase the possibility that they will be put in the ring instead of Webadict. I don't care who goes in as long as Webadict goes in, because if Webadict goes in then we can lynch Webadict.

[Pandarsenic]

Oh. So he did.

*Stares at it a bit*

OOOOOOHHHHHHHHHH.

webadict can battle Solifuge. Solifuge, what erratic scumhunting method will you adopt this game?

I fully intend to adopt none, and thereby throw you off ...unless perhaps I'm just saying this to throw you off, and actually do nothing uncommon at all, except emit WIFOM from all of my pores.


As for Webby and Zako, you're both arguing. It's not that you're arguing with eachother, but here:

Apparently, these are the "wrong reasons":
- Zako is Scum, as evidenced by his non-sequitur logic. It's poorly constructed and artificial, used to cover up his lack of actual fear or suspicion (being scum, he knows who is who).

- Webadict is Scum, and is also hella egotistical. He's fairly sure he can go up against any Town, and recieve enough Aid actions to win a duel, because of his implied value as a player... this would help make him to appear more trustworthy to the Town. The reason he is against dueling Zako is because it guarantees a Scum will die at the end of the duel... there is no other reason he would fear dueling, given that he always has an excess of self-confidence.

Did I miss something because I'm on 5 hours of sleep? I apologize if I did.

Going to class now.

I misinterpreted that part.

It still makes no sense that he would think Webadict would be okay with sacrificing one team member to another when that team member might be himself and the survivor would STILL be under huge suspicion.

[Jim Groovester]

Okay, I've looked through the thread.

Nowhere does Solifuge mention anything about the survivor. Or sacrificing team members.

I think you're confusing Solifuge with somebody else.

[Cheeetar]

Alright, screw this. Guys: We're going to lynch Webadict. This is a thing that's going to happen. We're going to lynch Webadict. If he turns out town (hint: he's scum) we're going to lynch me, because a town as skilled as Webadict would never be wrong about who scum is. I don't want Webadict to wriggle out of being lynched, so: We're going to lynch Webadict. You who believe Webadict: Lynching him will confirm him and gain the lynch of me afterwards, and since I'm so obviously scum by Webadict's arguments ("He's obvscum guys. He's obvscum for voting for me, and also because he's obvscum."), that will mean 1 scum death.

We lynch Webadict, he's town. We lynch me. 1 town, 1 scum dead.
We lynch Webadict, he's scum (HE IS). 1 scum dead.

Easy.

You know... I almost heard Webadict talking through you there, Cheeetar. I have this strange sense that this was a bussing strategy developed in scumchat, but I can't say why. :3

Right after unvoting everyone.
Now, this is scummy.

[Pandarsenic]

Jim, look at the part I bolded. He implied that Wuba wanted to go in against Zako, which I don't recall.

[Jim Groovester]

That's a fair point. webadict didn't mention that he didn't want to fight Zako, so I'm assuming Solifuge is reading into things.

In hindsight though, that comment looks pretty prescient. webadict pardoned Zako for... what reason exactly? He never said. If he did it must be buried beneath all his rage comments.

[Pandarsenic]

I don't recall either. I figure he was just being Unilateral Wubadict and did it because he thought you were both town or so the day wouldn't revolve around you instead of him.

If he really did pardon you guys. And if he did, if he's able to pardon two people at once.

... My intuition/resolve begins to falter. Something doesn't seem right.