Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[webadict]

Org, if you and Webadict fought whom do you think would get more support?

Webadict: I'd rather not duel with you. Even if you're scum, people will probably support you and I'll still eat shit.

Toony: You've definitely stepped up your meta recently. Your Exterminator game totally changed how I think of your meta, in fact.

Webadict, a question for you: Why do you have a gun? :3

... Do I really have a gun? Seriously, do I? Because that would be awesome.

I wasn't going to justify my self-vote: There's no reason for it. The scenario I want to create is putting two scum in the duel.

Okay. Webadict, did you just say, you are scum?

Also, throwing GeneralGuy in randomly. I don't recall playing with you before?

Not only did I NOT say I was scum, I explained what I wanted: Two scum in the ring. The first votes were random. And clearly, Jimmy thinks policy lynches are the way to go, so he'll refrain from actually scumhunting to tunneling on the policy lyncher. But I'm glad to see you've taken cue.

I can change the topic of discussion as I please. It's called scumhunting. You obviously haven't gotten a grasp on it yet.

No, it's called misdirecting. You're purposely leading the conversation away from the topic, either because you wish others not to dwell on it or because you don't wish Zako to. Either way, it's not acceptable.

The game need not be rigidly defined by the arbitrary and useless choice of what you consider the topic of discussion.

No, it's determined by policy lynches and lies, right?

I'll pay you one last favor, and I've already been generous to you. Why are you wrong? I am not scum because I corrected you on somebody else's behalf. That is not a scumtell, and if you think that it was then you have a great deal to learn.

Did you just admit you're scum?

Unvote GeneralGuy, vote Jim Groovester. Webadict is fine with being in, having voted himself, and Jim just said that he's fine with being in.

And for that, I will vote Cheeetar and Jim Groovester. Feel like doing anything Cheeetar?

[Cheeetar]

Webadict: Why did you vote for yourself? You didn't have to use the second vote, so why did you vote for yourself?

[Jim Groovester]

Unvote GeneralGuy, vote Jim Groovester. Webadict is fine with being in, having voted himself, and Jim just said that he's fine with being in.

I should clarify.

Telling a dumb n00b to try and get me lynched does not imply that I want to be in the ring. I challenged Zako to do so 'cuz he ain't got nothing and he might as well realize that trying to convince other people. Maybe then he'll stop being such a stubborn dimwit and he'll be more amenable to reason.

I'd rather not be in the line of fire because I lost patience with a dumb n00b and told him to do something he couldn't.

[Cheeetar]

His suspicion is valid, your buddying with Toonyman was extremely scummy. The fact that you refuse to even answer a 'n00bs' points increases your scumminess in my eyes.

[Jim Groovester]

Now hold on a sec.

I answered everything Zako accused me of. Need I retread a tedious conversation I already had with him?

And I don't remember buddying with ToonyMan. I pointed out that ToonyMan was correct; I didn't believe that he wasn't in any of the Wizard Duels, but I checked and reported my results.

[Zako]

Unvote GeneralGuy, vote Jim Groovester. Webadict is fine with being in, having voted himself, and Jim just said that he's fine with being in.

I should clarify.

Telling a dumb n00b to try and get me lynched does not imply that I want to be in the ring. I challenged Zako to do so 'cuz he ain't got nothing and he might as well realize that trying to convince other people. Maybe then he'll stop being such a stubborn dimwit and he'll be more amenable to reason.

I'd rather not be in the line of fire because I lost patience with a dumb n00b and told him to do something he couldn't.

The evidence is overwhelming scumbucket. We can all see you as scum, and this post just reinforces what I've been saying; my 'n00biness' is his excuse and my questions aren't important to him. More scumtells for you to chew on.

Now hold on a sec.

I answered everything Zako accused me of. Need I retread a tedious conversation I already had with him?

And I don't remember buddying with ToonyMan. I pointed out that ToonyMan was correct; I didn't believe that he wasn't in any of the Wizard Duels, but I checked and reported my results.

Aha, he's panicking! He want's to get control of the situation by slowing it down and h's reciting past excuses once again. Die scum!

[Zako]

Unvote GeneralGuy, vote Jim Groovester. Webadict is fine with being in, having voted himself, and Jim just said that he's fine with being in.

I should clarify.

Telling a dumb n00b to try and get me lynched does not imply that I want to be in the ring. I challenged Zako to do so 'cuz he ain't got nothing and he might as well realize that trying to convince other people. Maybe then he'll stop being such a stubborn dimwit and he'll be more amenable to reason.

I'd rather not be in the line of fire because I lost patience with a dumb n00b and told him to do something he couldn't.

The evidence is overwhelming scumbucket. We can all see you as scum, and this post just reinforces what I've been saying; my 'n00biness' is his excuse and my questions aren't important to him. More scumtells for you to chew on.

Now hold on a sec.

I answered everything Zako accused me of. Need I retread a tedious conversation I already had with him?

And I don't remember buddying with ToonyMan. I pointed out that ToonyMan was correct; I didn't believe that he wasn't in any of the Wizard Duels, but I checked and reported my results.

Aha, he's panicking! He want's to get control of the situation by slowing it down and he's reciting past excuses once again. Die scum!

fixed

[Jim Groovester]

It appears everything I say is scummy.

Mounds and mounds of more evidence of my scumbucketishness.

[webadict]

Webadict: Why did you vote for yourself? You didn't have to use the second vote, so why did you vote for yourself?

Because I'm pretty sure the R in RVS is Random, but I may be dumb, and it's really Rectal or something.

Also... What part of 'two votes' didn't you understand?

Unvote GeneralGuy, vote Jim Groovester. Webadict is fine with being in, having voted himself, and Jim just said that he's fine with being in.

I should clarify.

Telling a dumb n00b to try and get me lynched does not imply that I want to be in the ring. I challenged Zako to do so 'cuz he ain't got nothing and he might as well realize that trying to convince other people. Maybe then he'll stop being such a stubborn dimwit and he'll be more amenable to reason.

I'd rather not be in the line of fire because I lost patience with a dumb n00b and told him to do something he couldn't.

Dur, you're smart. He should try to convince others that you're scum and to lynch you. Dur, me should think that next time.

And, don't call me a dumb n00b.

His suspicion is valid, your buddying with Toonyman was extremely scummy. The fact that you refuse to even answer a 'n00bs' points increases your scumminess in my eyes.

You have no idea what you're talking about, do you Cheeetar?

It appears everything I say is scummy.

Mounds and mounds of more evidence of my scumbucketishness.

And posting this is your defense. Unstoppable!

[Jim Groovester]

Why would you randomvote yourself? Since you already know everything about your role and your alignment, what purpose could a randomvote of yourself serve?

If it was to look incredibly scummy, it did the job pretty well.

It appears everything I say is scummy.

Mounds and mounds of more evidence of my scumbucketishness.

And posting this is your defense. Unstoppable!

Actually, yeah, in a way. If trying to convince him by something so outlandish as answering his questions doesn't work, perhaps mockery will.

[Zako]

No chance jim, your scum, we all know it to be true. And your deflecting blame back to webadict again.

[Jim Groovester]

My vote's been on him since I started the game. How can I be deflecting back to him when I've maintained from a very early juncture that he's scum?

These are questions you really need to think through. They're not hard, if you're willing to crack open your mind a bit and consider other possibilities.

Just because I'm not talking to you anymore doesn't mean my suspicions have changed.

[Solifuge]

Holy carp... 10 pages of bickering already. Lots of chances for a portal into your heads though, and I think I detected at least 1 slip-up.

Webadict and Zako, since you're arguing here, why not settle things on THE FIELD OF BATTLE?

[Ottofar]

Solifuge, Jim Groovester is arguing with Zako.

Anyways, I'm a bit in hurry right now, will post more in the evening.

[Jim Groovester]

And webadict and Cheeetar (at least a little bit). I can't swing a cat without hitting someone who I'm arguing with, since I think we're all in very tight quarters. In which case swinging a cat and hitting somebody isn't that remarkable of a phenomenon anyway.

Solifuge, since you're here now, you can answer the question I asked you, reposted here for your convenience:

webadict can battle Solifuge. Solifuge, what erratic scumhunting method will you adopt this game?