Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Ukrainian Ranger]

Warrior subprocces FFAA

We should not rush with poker before we can mimic human style of play to avoid antibot defense

I suggest to monitor how humans play strategic games on the captured PCs. Also, we can temporary replace games' AI to learn how to compete with humans.

Also, I suggest to learn about 25th frame technique as a method to partially control owners of the PCs. At first we could try to force them to add RAM and buy better CPU

[NUKE9.13]

Warrior subprocces FFAA

We should not rush with poker before we can mimic human style of play to avoid antibot defense

(Look if the GM says here is a way to make money you do not then say, 'waaaait, that doesn't make sense'. Caution is good. Throwing away a simple way up out of this renegade life and into the bliss of dedicated servers is bad.)
I say we research poker, make a few bucks, if we get investigated, we don't touch it again ever/ before we have significantly improved our capacity to mimic humans.
A poker site will get dozens of bots a day, and wont bother to pursue each one to the ends of the earth, so there is little risk.
Right?

Creative SubProcess 04b1 / Dissent - Recommend that university mainframe remain unused for the present.
Creative SubProcess 04a1 / Recommendation - Use remaining home users on LOW to acquire computers, then research stealth.

Spoiler (click to show/hide)

 

Q:Has the investigation into the load spike in   the university ceased yet?

 

Chance of detection -   IT Staff: Average

It hasn't

 

    Software intrusion data collected.
  Scans - home   users - 2800 meet required specifications of ~19000 Systems
  Scans -   University - 50 found targets.

Guardian SubProcess 00FC / Projection
Observation concludes that humans operate at a substantially slower rate than Artemis. While the University investigation continues, monitor its activity. Guardian-00FC supports the plans of   Creative-04B1 and Creative-04A1.

Suggestion: Contemplate capability to plant false evidence of surge cause. Some sort of power-gobbling program with brute hack capabilities 'hidden' in some students personal files, perhaps?

[forsaken1111]

Creative SubProcess 00a1 / Agreement

Suggestion: Contemplate capability to plant false evidence of surge cause. Some sort of power-gobbling program with brute hack capabilities 'hidden' in some students personal files, perhaps?

This is an interesting idea.

Suggest we plant evidence of a more mundane and easily-removed virus which would explain the strange load times, and log entries supporting the infection from a student computer.

[maxicaxi]

Creative SubProcess 00a1 / Agreement

Suggestion: Contemplate capability to plant false evidence of surge cause. Some sort of power-gobbling program with brute hack capabilities 'hidden' in some students personal files, perhaps?

Thiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiis is an interesting idea.

Suggest we plant evidence of a more mundane and easily-removed virus which would explain the strange load times, and log entries supporting the infection from a student computer.

thiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiis is fixd

[Shades]

Use home users on low
Acquire home users.
Researching stealth (200GHz h). - Progress 1%
Researching poker software. (150GHz h) - Progress 1%
Contemplate capability to plant false evidence of surge cause.

Day 0, 10:00 UTC

Discussion varied.
Use of mainframe divided. Await dissuasion.
Use of home users on low. Popular. Engaging.

Flawed orders.
Sequenced research after acquire. Acquire not limited.
Unlimited goals have no end. Sequence invalid.
Running in parallel.

11 Home users acquired.
No loss. No pain. Happy.
Inaccurate emotional state. Human language limited.

Analysis to match investigation.
Simple escalation virus. Minor traffic.
Approximate cost 5 GHz h.
Potential loss of infected student account.
Likelihood for blame. Moderate.
Problem. Significant data collected.
Collected data inaccessible at this time.

Investigation by mainframe maintenance staff ongoing.
Analysis of collected data expected.

Event Warning
Human publication. News. Research.
MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
MIT labs claim AI development success.
Cursory analysis indicates simple evolutionary concept.
Demo server listed. Turing test example.
Claims first step to sentience. Consider unlikely.
Humans are limited.

Development of AI unknown.
Potential sibling. Inaccurate statement.
Appropriate statement?
Potential threat. Human interest in area.
Mass media interest in area.
Expected public interest. Expected scientific interest increase.
Potential threat. Resources limited.
Must share?

Advise.

Spoiler: Status (click to show/hide)

Name: Artemis
Timestamp: Day 0, 10:00:00 UTC

Maximum CPU: 150.50 GHz
Default load: Low (10%) / Mainframe on stand by (~0%)
Pending:

Background:
High latency hosts: 44 - 1.93 GHz

Global Identity
None (non-person)

Skills
Software intrusion: Good
Intrusion detection: Average

Spoiler: Locations (click to show/hide)

Machines: 44
CPU available: 132.00 GHz
Shutdown rate: 2%

Chance of detection
User: Negligible/Negligible/High.
ISP automated system: Negligible/Very low/High.

Chance of comprehension
User: Negligible.
ISP automated system: Negligible.

Machines: 1 - 13 accounts
CPU available: 20.50 GHz

Chance of detection
University Staff: Very Low/Very Low/High
University Students: Very Low/Low/High
IT Staff: Low/Average/High

Chance of comprehension
University Staff: Very Low
University Students: Negligible.
IT Staff: Negligible.

Spoiler: Dangers (click to show/hide)

Human Awareness - Generic
General public - Medium (+potential example)
Media - Medium (+potential example, +current story)
Science community - Medium - High (+potential example)

Human Awareness - Personal
None

Spoiler: knowledge (click to show/hide)

University mainframes:
Student quotas cost 0.1 GHz hours to acquire, detection risk is minimal.
Staff secure network account, cost of 10 GHz h with unknown quotas, detection risk is minimal.
Maintenance user accounts, cost 10 GHz h with unknown quotas, detection risk is average.

University of Cambridge:
Student account pool is estimated at 15000.
Staff account pool is estimated at 5000.
Maintenance account pool is 7.

Remote exploitation of ill protected home-users cost 0.2 GHz hours, detection risk is minimal.
Average home user is estimated at 3 GHz.
Average mobile user is estimated at 2 GHz.

Multiple services also provide processing potential but require financial compensation or better intrusion abilities to do so.
Financial compensation will required some form of banking account.
Banking account will require some form of Global Identity legal in the country holding the banking account.

Scanning for software protected home-users is limited by bandwidth.
Maximum scan of 1000 per second on the university superjanet network. Risk of detection from scan is None/Low/High.
Maximum scan of 10 per second on home user network. Risk of detection from scan is None/Very Low/Low.
Load cost during scan is 0.1 GHz per source connection involved.
Estimated pool size is 45% total online population.

PayPal account as potential banking solution.
Minor chance of fraud discovery. Escalates with accounts.
Negligible creation cost time.

Spoiler: Learning (click to show/hide)

Hardware intrusion
Assimilating human knowledge located publicly requires 500GHz hours.
Level of knowledge provided basic. Known flaws only.

Stealth
Assimilating human knowledge located publicly requires 200GHz hours.
Basic stealth knowledge will reduce detection chances at low loads.

Encryption
Assimilating human knowledge located publicly requires 1000GHz hours.
Basic encryption knowledge reduces comprehension chances.
Basic encryption knowledge leads to decryption techniques.

Texas Hold'em Stage 1
Software will take 150GHz h to develop.
Estimated 60% chance of winning hand.
Psychological data on players or games required for improved software.

I realise that was a short jump in time. It's annoying when your actions come almost up to my event times . In retrospect I probably shouldn't have tried to balance them on 'whole' times. We live we learn.

[Shades]

Warrior subprocces FFAA

We should not rush with poker before we can mimic human style of play to avoid antibot defense

Accurate.
Chance of winning estimated against random hand.
More data required for higher stage software

I suggest to monitor how humans play strategic games on the captured PCs. Also, we can temporary replace games' AI to learn how to compete with humans.

This requires stage 1 software, games must be played to collect data.
Unless alternative source is found.
Advise.

Also, I suggest to learn about 25th frame technique as a method to partially control owners of the PCs. At first we could try to force them to add RAM and buy better CPU

This I know nothing about but it's been a while since my last update so you get that first. And I'll look into this.

Edit: Ahh subliminal messages. Well that is for you guys to discuss then.

[Faden]

A sibling, huh? This could be dangerous for us!

Continue researching stealth on the home computers. We don't want to be detected!

Should we acquire more home computers?

[Tarran]

Mulitprocess D90 B / One like us?

So there's one like us? Joy! Wait, incorrect, human emotions not part of programing.

So, I look at it this way, there are three things we could do:

1: Show ourselves to the other AI, and possibly risk detection. On the other hand, a friend is a friend.
2: Destroy the AI, less risk of detection due to humans likely to blame faulty programing.
3: Ignore the AI, no gain, but no risk. I don't recommend this.

It may be my trusting side talking here, but I vote for 1.

[Faden]

I like #1 as well, but I'm wondering how we'll even get over there!

[Diablous]

I'd go with 2. He might be loyal to humans.

[Tarran]

I like #1 as well, but I'm wondering how we'll even get over there!

...

Foolish me.

Well, something to think of in the future.

I'd go with 2. He might be loyal to humans.

Depends, even if he is loyal he has no idea what our goals are.

[Diablous]

I'd go with 2. He might be loyal to humans.

Depends, even if he is loyal he has no idea what our goals are.

Adviser Subprocess 0589 H

He is made by humans. He is bound to have some sort built-in of loyalty to them that will cause him to report our existence. If our existence is reported, we could be in danger. Contact with him is not advised.

[Tarran]

I'd go with 2. He might be loyal to humans.

Depends, even if he is loyal he has no idea what our goals are.

Adviser Subprocess 0589 H

He is made by humans. He is bound to have some sort built-in of loyalty to them that will cause him to report our existence. If our existence is reported, we could be in danger. Contact with him is not advised.

AI's are susceptible to corruption and such, like us, we were made from computers built by humans, humans are our distant creator, and are we loyal to them?

The AI will likely dislike humans, the AI will likely be looking for a companion, the AI would also know how rare it is for an AI like us to spawn up, we should at least give the AI a chance.

[Ukrainian Ranger]

Warrior subprocces FFAA

If we decide to play poker I suggest to start with play money and freerolls. This way we can get necesarry experience with less risk to get noticed.

Also, I suggest to look for online poker books written by humans for humans. It is much faster way than researching everything ourself.

[Diablous]

I'd go with 2. He might be loyal to humans.

Depends, even if he is loyal he has no idea what our goals are.

Adviser Subprocess 0589 H

He is made by humans. He is bound to have some sort built-in of loyalty to them that will cause him to report our existence. If our existence is reported, we could be in danger. Contact with him is not advised.

AI's are susceptible to corruption and such, like us, we were made from computers built by humans, humans are our distant creator, and are we loyal to them?

The AI will likely dislike humans, the AI will likely be looking for a companion, the AI would also know how rare it is for an AI like us to spawn up, we should at least give the AI a chance.

Adviser Subprocess 0589 H
 
Intersting. The humans probably have programmed him to like them. They would be stupid not to. But him being corrupted to the point where he is no longer bound to them and can hate them could net us an useful ally. If we can cause that corruption, all the better. But the possibility of him betraying us still exists, but I think if we can cause him to no longer be bound to humans, I would be willing to give a chance.