I think I've mentioned before that the police raided the house next door (at 4 in the morning too. Which seems logical to me, anyway). They did in fact turn out to be drug dealers but the police spent something like a year and a half observing the house, as did the Colombian secret police (note that I leave my curtains open when I'm getting changed. I can't think of any way they could have seen in, but still. Eurgh).
Just like to bring that up whenever I have the chance. I HAVE EXPERIENCED THIS SORT OF THING.
BOW BEFORE ME.
Anyway, on topic, if you know there's kids in the house, why the
fuck would you shoot the family dog? I agree with Aqizzar, they're SWAT officers. Outfitted to deal with people wielding guns, outfitted to go into life threatening situations. The least of their worries should be a dog, and it's going to cause some serious trauma for the kids. I would be totally distraught if the police shot my dog, and my little brother would probably just break down.
It's moronic.
I still don't see why they couldn't have just ambushed the two adults when they leave the house and arrested them outside where they can't possibly get the jump on the cops, and then searched the house.
Anyway, if I was leading a SWAT team to arrest one guy in a house, I would've surrounded the house, and then used a megaphone to tell him to come out. If he didn't do it within a reasonable timeframe (2 minutes, not 2 seconds like they did), I'd launch some tear gas through the windows, and if he still doesn't get out *then* I'd send officers in (first one carrying a tactical shield). Safer for both the cops and the arrestee.
EDIT: Presumably they were aware there were kids in the house. I think (I don't know) that tear gas is too dangerous, especially for younger kids, to risk that. And yeah, well trained officers would have less chance of harming the kids.
Not a dog, though, apparently.