Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Poll

So, which was justified in their actions?

Yorkists
- 3 (27.3%)
Lancastrians
- 8 (72.7%)

Total Members Voted: 11


Pages: [1] 2 3

Author Topic: Wars Of The Roses, Which Is Better, Yorkists Or Lancastrians? Cheers!  (Read 2594 times)

Char13magne

  • Bay Watcher
  • Yeah, It's Charlemagne, with a sword, by Dürer.
    • View Profile

So, hi guys, another random discussion forum topic about history from me (this time I'll keep double-posting to a bare minimum :D), so in this case, my question is, do you guys think the encumbent Yorkists, or the usurping Lancastrians were more in the right? Please explain your opinions as I am trying to set up a premise for constructive debate on the topic, and it is a rather important one to the modern residents of England, as the current Royal family is really that of a line with royal blood only via a second bastard son, and really their only claim to power is as a family of usurpers. So, were their violent advances upon the throne of England justified, or was Henry just a nasty spider of a man?

                 Cheers!
« Last Edit: May 02, 2010, 11:01:05 am by Char13magne »
Logged
"It is forbidden to kill; therefore all murderers are punished unless they kill in large numbers and to the sound of trumpets."
               Voltaire
                   
"To have another language is to possess a second soul."              
               Charlemagne

baruk

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile

 I just think of them as a couple of warring tribes of bloodthirsty northerners. They aren't so diametrically opposed and distinguishable as, say, the Roundheads and Cavaliers.

Char13magne

  • Bay Watcher
  • Yeah, It's Charlemagne, with a sword, by Dürer.
    • View Profile

I just think of them as a couple of warring tribes of bloodthirsty northerners. They aren't so diametrically opposed and distinguishable as, say, the Roundheads and Cavaliers.

I see what you're saying, as they had no great ideallic differences, as opposed to the warring factions of the English Civil War. Still, they were very different in their motives, at least.
Logged
"It is forbidden to kill; therefore all murderers are punished unless they kill in large numbers and to the sound of trumpets."
               Voltaire
                   
"To have another language is to possess a second soul."              
               Charlemagne

ChairmanPoo

  • Bay Watcher
  • Send in the clowns
    • View Profile

Why isn't Tudor an option?
Logged
Everyone sucks at everything. Until they don't. Not sucking is a product of time invested.

Jackrabbit

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile

My question is why didn't the Lancastrians utterly destroy the other side nearly immediately? I mean, they had Ecky Thump.
Logged

SiN.Daeus

  • Bay Watcher
  • IT LIVES
    • View Profile

I agree with baruk. In my opinion, it was just a bunch of dudes fighting to control the crown. It wasn't really clash of ideaolgies or anything as dramatic as that. I would say that the Lancastrians are better, simply because they retook the throne.

Why isn't Tudor an option?

As far as I know, the War of the Roses ended with Edward IV's crowning. And Henry Tudor was Lancastrian. SO in essence, voting for Lancastrian means voting for Tudor.
Logged
The best kind of music is
---]HEAVY[---
---]HEAVY[---
---]METAL[---

ChairmanPoo

  • Bay Watcher
  • Send in the clowns
    • View Profile

wait, does that mean that the Lannisters will eventually win in the War of the Roses inspired ASOIF????  :o
Logged
Everyone sucks at everything. Until they don't. Not sucking is a product of time invested.

Vester

  • Bay Watcher
  • [T_WORD:AWE-INSPIRING:bloonk]
    • View Profile

With how the story's gone so far?

Yes. The Baratheons are gone, the Starks are gone, and the Martells are basically hinging everything on a marriage to the last Targaryen.

On the other hand, most of the main line Lannisters are either out of the running or soon to be, so...
Logged
Quote
"Land of song," said the warrior bard, "though all the world betray thee - one sword at least thy rights shall guard; one faithful harp shall praise thee."

Pathos

  • Guest

With how the story's gone so far?

Yes. The Baratheons are gone, the Starks are gone, and the Martells are basically hinging everything on a marriage to the last Targaryen.

On the other hand, most of the main line Lannisters are either out of the running or soon to be, so...

To be honest, Daenerys is really gonna fuck stuff up with her dragons, especially since
Logged

Vester

  • Bay Watcher
  • [T_WORD:AWE-INSPIRING:bloonk]
    • View Profile

With how the story's gone so far?

Yes. The Baratheons are gone, the Starks are gone, and the Martells are basically hinging everything on a marriage to the last Targaryen.

On the other hand, most of the main line Lannisters are either out of the running or soon to be, so...

To be honest, Daenerys is really gonna fuck stuff up with her dragons, especially since

Logged
Quote
"Land of song," said the warrior bard, "though all the world betray thee - one sword at least thy rights shall guard; one faithful harp shall praise thee."

ChairmanPoo

  • Bay Watcher
  • Send in the clowns
    • View Profile



To be honest, Daenerys is really gonna fuck stuff up with her dragons, especially since
Spoiler (click to show/hide)

As for the Lannisters winning, remember that
Spoiler (click to show/hide)
Logged
Everyone sucks at everything. Until they don't. Not sucking is a product of time invested.

Vester

  • Bay Watcher
  • [T_WORD:AWE-INSPIRING:bloonk]
    • View Profile

Spoiler (click to show/hide)

I hope not. He has bad luck with women, you just know it won't end well for either of them.
Logged
Quote
"Land of song," said the warrior bard, "though all the world betray thee - one sword at least thy rights shall guard; one faithful harp shall praise thee."

Char13magne

  • Bay Watcher
  • Yeah, It's Charlemagne, with a sword, by Dürer.
    • View Profile

Why isn't Tudor an option?

Oh, that's quite simple. The Tudors are really the victory of the Lancastrians, being a continuation of the dynasty set up by the rise of the Lancastrians to power.

Oh, and guys, since I see a lot of people saying that, "since it really wasn't a fight between ideologies and instead two groups vying for power, it isn't important" kind of thing. But if you look through history, the Yorkists were far more capable as rulers than any lancastrian up until the Tudors! So, when saying what is better for England, I at least would say Yorkists all the way! (Plus, Henry VI was really rather feeble minded and his queen a hated foreigner, and that during the war his wife's conduct was despicable, including her bringing in of Scottish and French troops, who proceded to sack and pillage English towns as if they were fighting the hundred years war! Meanwhile Yorkist troops were far better at keeping discipline after their victories so as not to sack and pillage their own country! The town of London, with a tradition of concern for the tradition of its town people generally supported the Yorkists, especially Richard duke of York and his son Edward IV.) 
« Last Edit: May 02, 2010, 08:10:31 am by Char13magne »
Logged
"It is forbidden to kill; therefore all murderers are punished unless they kill in large numbers and to the sound of trumpets."
               Voltaire
                   
"To have another language is to possess a second soul."              
               Charlemagne

sonerohi

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile

My whole knowledge of the War of the Roses comes from the Warrior Heir book series. But, within the series, Lancaster ( a dood, not the side) was a badass and the Red Roses were so much cooler. 
Logged
I picked up the stone and carved my name into the wind.

ChairmanPoo

  • Bay Watcher
  • Send in the clowns
    • View Profile

My knowledge from the war of the Roses comes from an english history course I accidentally signed in  as a free choice subject two years ago
Logged
Everyone sucks at everything. Until they don't. Not sucking is a product of time invested.
Pages: [1] 2 3