Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Tarran]

...

I'll admit I expected Evil (at least by the test's standards), but not Chaotic.

I didn't evil, or Chaotic. Janet, yes to both. But Aqizzar? No.

[Aqizzar]

I'll admit I expected Evil (at least by the test's standards), but not Chaotic.

I didn't evil, or Chaotic. Janet, yes to both. But Aqizzar? No.

I know?  Crazy, isn't it?

Like I said, it's not that I have a problem with authorities in general, I don't trust any rule I don't understand or agree with, which is most of them.  In the words of my father, who's probably more chaotic evil than me, "rules are for people who can't figure things out on their own".  I love the law, when it works for me, and I hate it when I run afoul of it.  Further, no authority is sacred; nor beyond my desire to profit from, however just that authority may be.  I'd tear down any nation if I thought I could prop my own rule up in its place; if I can seat myself atop an existing structure, so much the easier.  But even when I am in charge of something, if someone else breaks my rules, I'm not overly concerned about it.  If it's inconsequential, I say, "meh, let'em; obviously the rules weren't important there".  And if they do it in an impressive way, I'm likely to say, "good show lads," and let them enjoy the victory.

Then I'd crush them, out of spite.  Can't let people think I don't care, because that's no law at all.

[Vester]

Barons. They're always up to something.

[Jreengus]

Although I didn't take the test I see myself as Lawful Evil, I tend to be selfish but I obey pretty much all laws or rules in a given situation.

[Cheeetar]

True Neutral.

[Jackrabbit]

Yeah, I retook the test and got Neutral Good. No surprises there. I quite like Neutral Good though.

[Akigagak]

Chaotic neutral, probably because I went for the 'I hate/distrust religion' answers when the came up.

[Pathos]

Spoiler: Lawful Evil (click to show/hide)

A lawful evil villain methodically takes what he wants within the limits of his code of conduct without regard to whom it hurts. He cares about tradition, loyalty, and order, but not about freedom, dignity, or life. He plays by the rules, but without mercy or compassion. He is comfortable in a hierarchy and would like to rule, but he is willing to serve. He condemns others not according to their actions but according to race, religion, homeland, or social rank. He is loath to break laws or promises. This reluctance is partly because of his nature and partly because he depends on order to protect himself from those who oppose him on moral grounds. Some lawful evil villains have particular taboos, such as not killing in cold blood (but having underlings do it) or not letting children come to harm (if it can be helped). They imagine that these compunctions put them above unprincipled villains. The scheming baron who expands his power and exploits his people is lawful evil. Some lawful evil people and creatures are committed to evil with a zeal like that of a crusader committed to good. Beyond being willing to hurt others for their own ends, they take pleasure in spreading evil as an end unto itself. They may also see doing evil as part of a duty to an evil deity or master. Lawful evil is sometimes called "diabolical" because devils are the epitome of lawful evil. Lawful evil is the most dangerous alignment because it represents methodical, intentional, and frequently successful evil.

--excerpted from the Player’s Handbook, Chapter 6

Lawful Evil, huh. Would've preferred neutral evil, but who cares?

I think this test is fairly hard to get "right". I retook it again and go Chaotic Evil, with just a few minor question changes.

Spoiler: Chaotic Evil (click to show/hide)

A chaotic evil character does whatever his greed, hatred, and lust for destruction drive him to do. He is hot-tempered, vicious, arbitrarily violent, and unpredictable. If simply out for whatever he can get, he is ruthless and brutal. If he is committed to the spread of evil and chaos, he is even worse. Thankfully, his plans are haphazard, and any groups he joins or forms are poorly organized. Typically, chaotic evil people can only be made to work together by force, and their leader lasts only as long as he can thwart attempts to topple or assassinate him. The demented sorcerer pursuing mad schemes of vengeance and havoc is chaotic evil. Chaotic evil is sometimes called "demonic" because demons are the epitome of chaotic evil. Chaotic evil is the most dangerous alignment because it represents the destruction not only of beauty and life but of the order on which beauty and life depend.

--excerpted from the Player’s Handbook, Chapter 6

[ChairmanPoo]

Chaotic Neutral. WHUT?

Spoiler (click to show/hide)

A chaotic neutral character follows his whims. He is an individualist first and last. He values his own liberty but doesn’t strive to protect others’ freedom. He avoids authority, resents restrictions, and challenges traditions. The chaotic neutral character does not intentionally disrupt organizations as part of a campaign of anarchy. To do so, he would have to be motivated either by good (and a desire to liberate others) or evil (and a desire to make those different from himself suffer). The common phrase for chaotic neutral is "true chaotic." Remember that the chaotic neutral character may be unpredictable, but his behavior is not totally random. He is not as likely to jump off a bridge as to cross it. Chaotic neutral is the best alignment you can be because it represents true freedom both from society’s restrictions and from a do-gooder’s zeal.

[warhammer651]

True neutral

Spoiler (click to show/hide)

Neutral

A neutral character does what seems to be a good idea. She doesn’t feel strongly one way or the other when it comes to good vs. evil or law vs. chaos. Most neutrality is a lack of conviction or bias rather than a commitment to neutrality. Such a character thinks of good as better than evil. After all, she would rather have good neighbors and rulers than evil ones. Still, she’s not personally committed to upholding good in any abstract or universal way. Some neutral characters, on the other hand, commit themselves philosophically to neutrality. They see good, evil, law, and chaos as prejudices and dangerous extremes. They advocate the middle way of neutrality as the best, most balanced road in the long run. The common phrase for neutral is "true neutral." Neutral is the best alignment you can be because it means you act naturally, without prejudice or compulsion.

--excerpted from the Player’s Handbook, Chapter 6

[Jude]

I got lawful good but IRL I'm probably closer to Neutral good or even chaotic good, depending on what issue.

[Cthulhu]

True Neutral, that's boring.

[bjlong]

Neutral Good

[Boksi]

Lawful Good or Neutral Good, depending on my mood when I take the test.

[Myroc]

The test stated me as Chaotic Neutral. I'd say I'm border-lining on Chaotic Evil here.