Neutral - A neutral character does what seems to be a good idea. She doesn’t feel strongly one way or the other when it comes to good vs. evil or law vs. chaos. Most neutrality is a lack of conviction or bias rather than a commitment to neutrality. Such a character thinks of good as better than evil. After all, she would rather have good neighbours and rulers than evil ones. Still, she’s not personally committed to upholding good in any abstract or universal way. Some neutral characters, on the other hand, commit themselves philosophically to neutrality. They see good, evil, law, and chaos as prejudices and dangerous extremes. They advocate the middle way of neutrality as the best, most balanced road in the long run. The common phrase for neutral is "true neutral." Neutral is the best alignment you can be because it means you act naturally, without prejudice or compulsion.
Pfft, everyone knows morality is just an abstract concept that does not really exist. right and wrong actions exist as far as some actions are more overall beneficial than others, and the Buddhists got it wrong: Logic and reason, the ability to make decisions, observe situations and draw conclusions entirely free of emotion or presupposition is true enlightenment. Have I achieved this? Hell no. Will I ever? Hell no. Should we stop trying? Hell no.
And that's my world view ^^
I hate a lot of these questions. Like in that other not-D&D one for example "114) My own happiness and success are more important than the happiness and success of others.", well they are more important to me than anyone elses (it's my life I'm living), but I recognise in the grand scheme of it all they are as unimportant as everyone elses...So what answer do I give? :S