I'm voting him because I have 4 picks for exterminator, and he's highest on the list. I'll be looking back through the thread soon to do another little examination.
Fair enough, although 4/10 seems a little excessive (unless you're on your own list for some reason). I'll wait for your 'more later' post though. Just make sure there is one. (don't think the dopps would make that mistake twice and don't want to waste a lynch if that's the case).
I'm mostly interested in people who switched from their earlier arguments in order to vote RedWarrior0 after the dogpile began. I'm suspecting bussing, particularly from my dear friend forsaken1111.
Yesterday's votes on RedWarrior0: forsaken1111, JanusTwoface, Jim Groovester, Pandarsenic, Vector
A reasonable argument. For reference, here's the voting record I have on RedWarrior0:
Reply #185 - webadict for first "more later" post
Reply #325 - me for no "more later" after 200ish posts
Reply #418 - Pandarsenic "LYNCH ALL LURKERS"
Reply #421 - forsaken votes but seems defensive about it
Reply #453 - Mr.Person for role fishing
Reply #459 - Vector seemingly based on Pardarsenic's posts
Reply #472 - Jim Groovester for bandwagon -> WIFOM post
Actually, no-one ever unvoted him. That's kind of interesting.
So
Solifuge, why did you pick forsaken? Because he was first on Mephansteras' list and thus easy perhaps?
The other way around, RedWarrior's votes:
Reply #67 - Vector, looks like RVS
Reply #179 - unvote, this is the first "post more" post
Makes me suspicious of Vector if anything. Common enough for newer scum to vote a partner during RVS. Not too suspicious though.
That being said, there's another problem. You posted
here calling for a lynch on either forsaken or RedWarrior (although you kept your vote on forsaken) and then didn't post again even though the day didn't end until two and a half days later. Any particular reason for that?
Actually, I was curious, so I went back to try to find out when you first voted for forsaken. Turns out it was all of the way back in
Reply #164 (page 4 / 11) for forsaken's rather unhelpful attitude. It was a good point then, but is it still now? I went back through the posts and forsaken's attitude varies from competely pointless and random (like the quote pyramids with Org
) to some actually useful posts.
Mostly I think that forsaken is still figuring out his playstyle he's gotten hammered for being too agressive and for being too passive, town both times. I'm getting the same vibes this time.
Basically, I think Vector's a little suspicious for being the only person RedWarrior voted, Solifuge is lurking somewhat (which isn't unusual, but unfortunate; at least there's content), and forsaken goes back and forth on voting.
Oh crap. I forgot to use the Gambler's Fallacy to say that...
Pandarsenic
Vector
RedWarrior0
will be scum.
Org will be third party.
Going back through the thread I found this. 1/4 so far. If he turns out to have been correct, he's going to be insufferable next game...
Warning - while you were typing 19 new replies have been posted. You may wish to review your post.
!!!!!
I'm going to go ahead and post this, I'll look through the rest when I get back home.
Author
Topic: Paranormal Mafia - Round 15 - Game over! (Read 99859 times)