Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Pandarsenic]

Ah, you're right. Apologies, I had your FoS confused with Jokerman-EXE's hi-I'm-buddying-Jim vote for me because of his double post.

[forsaken1111]

Okay, I just went through 29 pages and didn't find a single post by RedWarrior0 which contained anything that I would consider substantial. I now agree with Pandar, especially in light of Red's recent active lurking and low post count.

I am going to unvote and vote RedWarrior0 at this point. I just hope that he is scum active lurking, as he seems to be, rather than a townie who is just too busy to play.

[Jokerman-EXE]

Forums mess up on you? Its been glitching on me all day.

Ugh, yeah. They've been giving me Hell since Friday.

Actually, since Kashyyk is being replaced and is not lurking, I'll unvote, and revote Jokerman.

His most recent post isn't so much a defence as an attempt to appease Jim at the last minute.

No, it's me voicing a goddam suspicion. You know, doing the thing that was asked of me. That's how I thought the game worked.

Does that satisfy you, Groovestar?

No. Not especially.

First, you backpedal off your vote on forsaken1111, and then you... what? Pander to my suspicions? (More like Pandar to my suspicions. Get it? Get it?)

I explained my reasoning for moving my vote. If you can't read the post enough to realize that, then there's no point in trying to sway you because you apparently won't get it.

Jim, I'm tempted to keep my vote on you for the "Pandar to my suspicions joke" but I appreciate bad puns and OMGUS votes like the one you just cast, good job there by the way, and now that you're playing, which is what the Lynch All Lurkers (and Activelurkers) policy is meant to enforce...

Nice buddying, scum.

Ah, you're right. Apologies, I had your FoS confused with Jokerman-EXE's hi-I'm-buddying-Jim vote for me because of his double post.

How the fuck am I buddying him? He's voting for me, dude. I'm accusing you because, you know, you're scum and you act like, that's right, scum. By the way, read my double post, because I'm still waiting for the continuation of your accusation of Org/the switch over to Jim.

In fact, in addition to that, what's your current scumlist?

[ToonyMan]

Pointing the finger at Forsaken for being stupid with Jim's analyze post.

Most notably, this quote,

Oh, oops. I was looking at the last votecount and missed Leafsnail unvoting Jokerman-EXE. So I guess I didn't break the tie.

In that case, I'll Remove my Extension Objection.

So you voted to 'break the tie' and now that you realize that your vote created a tie situation you don't change it?

You removed your objection to the extension but did not vote for one. Do you want a tie situation?

For my part, I'll throw in for an extension.

Awfully freakin jumpy, after removing his extension objection you attack him for trying to cause a tie?  That makes 0 sense.

FAKE-EDIT:  Looks like Jim responded to this, I'm making my mark anyway.

You guys do know lynching lurkers is a good way to avoid scum-hunting right?
(that's bad thing)

[Mr.Person]

Lynching lurkers is better than having them.

[Pandarsenic]

Forums mess up on you? Its been glitching on me all day.

Ugh, yeah. They've been giving me Hell since Friday.

Actually, since Kashyyk is being replaced and is not lurking, I'll unvote, and revote Jokerman.

His most recent post isn't so much a defence as an attempt to appease Jim at the last minute.

No, it's me voicing a goddam suspicion. You know, doing the thing that was asked of me. That's how I thought the game worked.

Does that satisfy you, Groovestar?

No. Not especially.

First, you backpedal off your vote on forsaken1111, and then you... what? Pander to my suspicions? (More like Pandar to my suspicions. Get it? Get it?)

I explained my reasoning for moving my vote. If you can't read the post enough to realize that, then there's no point in trying to sway you because you apparently won't get it.

Jim, I'm tempted to keep my vote on you for the "Pandar to my suspicions joke" but I appreciate bad puns and OMGUS votes like the one you just cast, good job there by the way, and now that you're playing, which is what the Lynch All Lurkers (and Activelurkers) policy is meant to enforce...

Nice buddying, scum.

Ah, you're right. Apologies, I had your FoS confused with Jokerman-EXE's hi-I'm-buddying-Jim vote for me because of his double post.

How the fuck am I buddying him? He's voting for me, dude. I'm accusing you because, you know, you're scum and you act like, that's right, scum. By the way, read my double post, because I'm still waiting for the continuation of your accusation of Org/the switch over to Jim.

In fact, in addition to that, what's your current scumlist?

Buddying because you're voting someone who was voting for him and that he FoS'd.

And I don't see how appreciating bad puns is buddying, but okay.

[webadict]

Vig can shoot Panda tonight.

[RedWarrior0]

If there is one. How do you know/ why do you think there is webadict? Ignoring lurk accusations for the moment because there isn't much defense against them.

[Mr.Person]

@RedWarrior: That's rolefishing.

[Pandarsenic]

Vig can shoot Panda tonight.

That would be wasteful.

[webadict]

If there is one. How do you know/ why do you think there is webadict? Ignoring lurk accusations for the moment because there isn't much defense against them.

Why are you rolefishing?

[Pandarsenic]

WUBA WUBA WUBA is exterminator with intel.

[webadict]

WUBA WUBA WUBA is exterminator with intel.

Rooooooolefishing.

[Pandarsenic]

WUBA WUBA WUBA is exterminator with intel.

Rooooooolefishing.

You're a joke.

[webadict]

WUBA WUBA WUBA is exterminator with intel.

Rooooooolefishing.

You're a joke.

At least I'm funny.