I'm also starting a new fort with 31.10 for testing purposes.
Here is a little interim release with less glowing objects to save you from eye strain!
I registered(again) to react for 0.43 set, and this post.
Suddenly, after seeing that pic, i just made what i want you to check, guys:
tileset:
7z:
http://www.easy-share.com/1911357184/ironhand0_dfg.7zNow, what's there, on these screens:
- doors that were best in 0.42 ironhand set and were definitely broken in 0.43, chg to 0.42's here.
- bag(0.31 pictogram - sex representation made bags just...bad looking now, Mayday icons were optimal and strangely...clear. Taken from Mayday set).
- levers - taken from Mayday(maybe unnecesary, but something made me doing it like this),
- beds - non tile-magic bed from Mayday set(That's the SHAPE to make perfect tile-magic'ed beds, imho).
- dwarves taken from Mayday set(so it's not considered here, imo, neccesary for long term DFG sets user, unfortunately no tile-magic here;/)).
I thought i share this, as with 0.43 i can see some..disadvantages of current..way.
Btw, workshop tiles are barely readable without zooming, i think these may need other, simplier method for 16x16's.
---
Big respect, Ironhand, you are doing great and refreshing job, but do not loose it, please...
---
Now, this post is comment, nothing more.