Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 95 96 [97] 98 99 ... 329

Author Topic: Ironhand's Graphics Set (on Hiatus)  (Read 1247443 times)

Rebirthocool

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Ironhand's Graphics Set (here's 0.43!)
« Reply #1440 on: July 15, 2010, 01:19:50 am »

i'll throw my vote in for round stools  ;D

i like the easter egg gems too
Logged

Thundrim

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Ironhand's Graphics Set (here's 0.43!)
« Reply #1441 on: July 15, 2010, 01:39:17 am »

Round stools looks good. When both objects stay the same shape, differentiation issues tend to sneak up from under the table, and poke you in the eye when least expected. Besides, the tables are so often used for eating, so you would want the traditional square design there, to safely wield cutlery and afford broad swings with the ale.

Square tables looks more Dwarfy at any rate, and that trumps all rational thought. So take it out on the stools! Also handy for tantrums!

---
Logged

Dearnen

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Ironhand's Graphics Set (here's 0.43!)
« Reply #1442 on: July 15, 2010, 01:44:49 am »

Best of all, when dwarves jump up to celebrate with booze in hand, the stool has a better chance of rolling out of the way if it's round.  Square stools are a tripping hazard for properly inebriated dwarves.
Logged

Maldevious

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Ironhand's Graphics Set (here's 0.43!)
« Reply #1443 on: July 15, 2010, 06:46:55 am »

Definitely go with the round stools!
Logged

Ironhand

  • Bay Watcher
  • the llama is laughing
    • View Profile
Re: Ironhand's Graphics Set (here's 0.43!)
« Reply #1444 on: July 15, 2010, 07:08:40 am »

Consider it done.
Logged

Harmonica

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Ironhand's Graphics Set (here's 0.43!)
« Reply #1445 on: July 15, 2010, 08:55:42 am »

I think I'm vehemently opposed to these new-fangled round edged things.

I'm not mistaken in thinking that dwarves love their chamfered edges and squares.. and that circles are considered inefficient and un-dwarvenly?

I have an alternative: what about benches? A rectangle, which looks good on its own but in a row forms a long bench?

quick and dirty:

« Last Edit: July 15, 2010, 09:09:05 am by Harmonica »
Logged

Ironhand

  • Bay Watcher
  • the llama is laughing
    • View Profile
Re: Ironhand's Graphics Set (here's 0.43!)
« Reply #1446 on: July 15, 2010, 09:15:57 am »

Rows of chairs running north-south will look weird, though...
Logged

Harmonica

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Ironhand's Graphics Set (here's 0.43!)
« Reply #1447 on: July 15, 2010, 09:33:40 am »

You're right. You spotted a slight flaw :)

If I think about dwarven seating I reckon they would use benches, though.
Logged

Thundrim

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Ironhand's Graphics Set (here's 0.43!)
« Reply #1448 on: July 15, 2010, 10:19:39 am »

That Lord of the Rings movie over-emphasized Dwarven squareness a bit, to create architectural contrast or something. Not that simplification is bad, I am all for that. But roundness and Dwarves should traditionally not be mutually exclusive, how could you otherwise get a proper beer belly. He he...

---
Logged

Wavecutter

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Ironhand's Graphics Set (here's 0.43!)
« Reply #1449 on: July 15, 2010, 10:40:45 am »

I too am in favor of the round stool.
Logged
We farm and kill mermaid children. Its too late to worry about political correctness.

Vince

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Ironhand's Graphics Set (here's 0.43!)
« Reply #1450 on: July 15, 2010, 11:02:25 am »

And that's why I think a custom make-your-own-tileset install helper would be great! :)
Square benches for me btw.

Great work!

BTW: Because no one commented on it, I post it again:

http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=53180.msg1396828#msg1396828
What do you think? Tile magic is missing at this point, though.
Logged

Wavecutter

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Ironhand's Graphics Set (here's 0.43!)
« Reply #1451 on: July 15, 2010, 12:16:34 pm »

 Why add more work for Iron and Worm? I propose that if there is some tile a person dislikes that they can edit the files themselves to fit what they want. i am more than happy to use this tile set without placing any undue burden on it's creator/s
Logged
We farm and kill mermaid children. Its too late to worry about political correctness.

Vince

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Ironhand's Graphics Set (here's 0.43!)
« Reply #1452 on: July 15, 2010, 12:18:35 pm »

Why add more work for Iron and Worm? I propose that if there is some tile a person dislikes that they can edit the files themselves to fit what they want. i am more than happy to use this tile set without placing any undue burden on it's creator/s
I already volunteered to do it some pages ago, after proposing the idea. ;P
Programming is not the work of Iron and Worm, after all.
« Last Edit: July 15, 2010, 12:31:25 pm by Vince »
Logged

Cheddarius

  • Bay Watcher
  • Hrm.
    • View Profile
Re: Ironhand's Graphics Set (here's 0.43!)
« Reply #1453 on: July 15, 2010, 12:52:03 pm »

Why add more work for Iron and Worm? I propose that if there is some tile a person dislikes that they can edit the files themselves to fit what they want. i am more than happy to use this tile set without placing any undue burden on it's creator/s
Technically, you could make that argument for submitting a tileset as nothing but the regular DF ASCII tileset.
Logged

Star Weaver

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Ironhand's Graphics Set (here's 0.43!)
« Reply #1454 on: July 15, 2010, 01:10:22 pm »

The round stools are just an aproximation of of a 32-side faceted shape with a multi-level bevel (or is that a chamfer?) around the rim. Becuase the IDEAL dwarven chair is a gigantic crown-cut gem that you sit on, in a giant gem-setting that provides legs. Or something ^_^
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 95 96 [97] 98 99 ... 329