Well, that was a huge generality that's entirely untrue.
Seriously. Just because you're having trouble does not mean everybody with one equal variable does too.
64-bit Windows 7 Home Premium, i7-860 OC @ 4.00 GHz (x4) here, constant 100 fps on a 4x4 embark for at least 3 years.
No Mayday pack, no seasonal autosave.
I did say, "might be". It was based off the observation of strange behaviors that are similar, symptomatically, to issues I run into when debugging multi-threaded, multi-process, or cluster distributed applications. There are many applications that are threaded, but have issues with Windows dividing up the processing across other processing units. This is because they weren't designed to handle asymmetric processing issues that arise out this. There's a big difference between work being done concurrently and consecutively. Also, I noticed a significant reduction of complete freeze ups that trip Windows's detection of hung processes and saw far more slow-downs and bog-downs instead.
All I did to cause this change was to assign the dwarfort.exe affinity to a single idle core. This also allowed me to watch a rollercoaster effect when it comes to CPU usage that coincided with bog downs. Game bogged down, but CPU usage dropped. Beforehand, many of the these would have become complete freezes.
The visibility of these issues can also vary because of the "race condition" that sometimes causes them. You may not being seeing anything obvious, because of the speed your computer is presently running at. The race condition, presently, is being won in your favor because the game is processing things in a correct enough order to avoid any issues. You might experience completely different behaviors if there were other tasks running on the system hogging up resources enough to upset the tricky balance and order. This is one of the bigger pains in parallel processing: Glitch reproduction across dissimilar platforms.
So... I am making a generalization, technically, but it is made with considerable consideration making use of specific experiences and specialized education. Again, it is made without being able to see the source code and practices in use. And the statement was meant to be a suggestion for the basis of exploration into possible causes for an issue rather than a direct implication of the cause for an issue.