And Cryptfeind, your attacking webadict because he's attacking Diablous? And now you think they are scum team?
For some reason, im not so sure if your arguements are all too correct.
Because I think that web is that full of himself.I do not want to dig up quotes right now, but if you really want me to, I can get some.
Yes please do I cant tell what you are thinking.When did I say that people can't look at me?
It was implied.I think its prod time for Cript...
Sorry dudes.@Shadow - lylo, standing for LYnch or LOse.
Werid, I always heard it as lyol, standing for LYnch Or LoseWasn't the day ending on sunday?
Oh, I'm sorry, did you want it to end on a No Lynch so you could win?
He had more votes than anyone if the day ended he would have died. This is a example of how you are desperately trying to make others look scummy via lying.
Oh Warning - while you were typing a new reply has been posted. You may wish to review your post. I will look in a sec... and tare you apart.
Wow this post is a mess to defrag. Please, next time, put spaces before you make another argument, because it looks better to others trying to read and for me to reply to.
1. While I agree that lynching a scum partner is the best move WIFOM-wise, it fails under the fact that I'm Town, and therefore lynching scum is neither for WIFOM nor anything else.
2. For someone really wanting quotes you sure give little.
3. It isn't implied. I have nothing to hide, so by logical reasoning looking at me finds Town. I WANT people to find Town. Making people not look at you makes you look scummy regardless of alignment. Do I look like an idiot?
4. I don't care.
5. It's LyLo.
6. For some reason, I was under the impression I had two votes... Oh well, my mistake. It happens.
7. It's spelled tear.
Cut for length.
My GOD! Next time. PRESS. ENTER.
1. By your definition, I'd have to be at least half right if you believe forsaken is scum. And, since I'm trying to lynch forsaken, that's just plain incorrect reasoning in its own right.
2. Hehehe... You mean, shome wasn't suspicious before me?
That is ether really good (if shome is town) or really bad (if shome is scum)
Since I was suspicious of shome before I am somewhat scared. On the other hand I think there are two others it may be so I am hopeful.
I mean, how many times did he post? I believe this post sums that up:
I just realized that he did not post for six days here.
On the other hand it would be reasonable to assume that he cant post tell the after noon and so should be here in ~5 hours or so. Until then keep in mind that he may not be able to post.
So that means he was lurking, and how you got an adequate read on him that Day, I'll be confused by, given:
Day one: I start a bandwagon on azulth because he was being scummy. He dies and is town. Squgo attacks Diablous. Joker attacks me.
Night one: Joker dies
Day two: Squgo and I attack D lurkers and spit attack PP PP dies and is town.
Night two: S dies.
Day three: I attack D than popular vote turns to shome, turns out his com is broke and that is why he is lurking. Web replaces shome.
You say nothing about being suspicious of him in this post, yet list several suspicions in there to justify. You also mention targeting lurkers.
Bold.
Faced.
Lie.
3. Look up. Just... look up.
4. I don't know how you twisted that out of context. I meant look at the justifications behind the votes, and it's pretty much straightfoward there.
Even if you twisted it out of context, how could I get this:
Webadict - forsaken1111
Oh well okay than.
Unvote. Webadict.
Lets kill the people I know are scum first. Than we can kill the probably scum.
Lolol. So, I was wrong to begin with then? It's Diablous and Criptfeind? I mean, it makes sense in context, since Diablous' first vote is for you, which is a common newbie scum move. I just thought it was more likely to be Shad0wyone.
That would mean that scum voted for scum, which I wouldn't use as evidence to the contrary. You're not looking big picture, are you? You're just thinking breaking sticks demolishes a house.
5. This isn't an argument. This isn't even a fact. But, let's look back anyhow:
Web, A lynch on D I can get behind but I am not so sure that Shad0wyone is scum and spitfire/you are not.
No offense to you but shome was acting pretty scummy before he was replaced and I don't know about you so far. As for spitfire he has been laying back and not doing much other than jumping on and bandwagoning. As far as Shad0wyone goes he seems scummy day one but his helpfulness on day two helps him in my eyes a lot.
Can you quote what makes him look scummy to you?
You're fine with a Diablous lynch...
Day one: I start a bandwagon on azulth because he was being scummy. He dies and is town. Squgo attacks Diablous. Joker attacks me.
Night one: Joker dies
Day two: Squgo and I attack D lurkers and spit attack PP PP dies and is town.
Night two: S dies.
Day three: I attack D than popular vote turns to shome, turns out his com is broke and that is why he is lurking. Web replaces shome.
Fine with a Diablous vote...
I have a better question: Can you quote something that makes him look not scummy to you?
Is basically it, I am just not feeling scum coming off of him.Basically, you're saying I can't be trusted over Diablous for the sole reason of the person that previously played me, which is complete crap because reading him makes it pretty obvious he's town. Then again, I can read newbies pretty well.
No, Diablous is still at the top of my list I am saying at this point I cant trust you over spitfire or Shad0w.
Have your alone time with D but don't expect me to not try to call you out when say things that don't make sense.
AlsoArguments are great and all, but I'm not going to give those to you yet. You make a decision without any of my information first. We have all Day, do we not?
So basically "I am webaddict and don't need reasons!" helping me learn as a newbie is great in all but I am not going to let you use that as a excuse for not acting rational.
AND STILL FINE WITH A DIABLOUS VOTE...
Lol, oh wait, Diablous moves to number 5 on the scumdar after the total of... 1 day and 4 posts. Evidence? Lack of evidence. Apparently, pointing out his mistakes leads him to this, though:
I hate to do this but since the day (As far as I know) is going to end in four hours and I will not have access to a computer for a bit I will have to Unvote and vote for Diablous. we need a lynch and as much as I want to lynch web I don't think he is going to vote himself and the others seems to have disappeared. Diablous is a good choice though as he is still (despite how good web is making him look) high on my suspicions.
Wow, when did that happen? What? You mean... 9 hours after THIS POST?
Than mabye stop fucking around and say them? ReallyDon't be a dick :I
I am simply not seeing your "arguments".
You SAY you have three posts for D and two for shadow but you dont produce them.
Basically, you have enough time to state that I might possibly maybe somewhat could somewhere be scum, but not enough to find reasons, scumhunt, or even ask questions.
Like you? "I AM WEBADDICT I AM MAGICKLY NOT SCUM SO YOU MUST DO WHATEVER I SAY BECAUSE I AM INFFALABIL!" That is not scum hunting.
I don't see any of your "arguments" that I did not address and you you are basickly iggnoreing me in the hope that the others will say "HE IS WEBADDICT WE MUST TRUST HIM! VOTE FOR WHO EVER HE PIONTS US AT!" and you know what? That may work because you are webaddict, but I sure hope not because you are acting so scummy and that is such a cheep tactic to pull in a beginners game it makes me hurt. Don't we have beginners so that exsperts cant pull this shit on beginners and make them hater the game? Webaddict unless you stop iggnoreing my and strat doing something other than trying to ride your webaddict cred in a beginners game you are scum.
6. This is a stupid comment. If you voted me today... You won't have to attack me Tomorrow? A) If I'm lynched, we lose and there won't be a Tomorrow; B) Even if you were a Town, it'd STILL wouldn't make sense, seeing as how you'd waste a vote on me, or lynch me, and we'd either lose or I'd be dead, depending on my alignment. That comment doesn't make any sense at all!
7. I'm going to quote what you said for convenience. You argument is this:
Not giving evidence.
Avoiding questions.
Trying to make us not think and just follow you.
WIFOM
And now I am adding OMGUS to the list
A. I am and have almost always given evidence. I even pointed it out to you here:
http://www.bay12games.com/forum/index.php?topic=51783.msg1172734#msg1172734The quote is too huge to fit wonderfully in this WOT.
B. Which questions am I avoiding, and how are any of them more important than "Are you scum?"
C. If I were doing that, I'd tell you to vote Diablous and lynch him without posting anything more. The fact that I'm replying and posting anything makes that argument both a lie and stupid.
D. I suppose I could avoid WIFOMing. It's a bad thing to do in general. I'll agree on that one, because YOU DO IT TOO. Many of those posts are within this block.
E. OMGUS? Man that's a good one. I believe you'd have to add it to Diablous, too, right? OMGUS isn't that much of a scumtell when it's the scum that's voting you in the first place. But, yes I am guilty of that one too. What's the big deal?
You partner? I think it is forsaken or spitfire, I am leaning toward forsaken but only a little bit because you are making him look so good.
Thanks for the OMGUS and one more piece of evidence.
Shadow, I think you are town but that does not mean you can sit back and "Wait for me and web to duke it out."
See, that's both
WIFOM AND
buddying. See how easily you do both of those things?
Anything else?