Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[ECrownofFire]

It's still pointless to vote against something at all. We could just say that you can vote for two things. We get the chance to do multiple things, and we don't have to deal with this pointlessness.

[Ochita]

It works, so lets stick with it. I mean you know we reached the best of the ways to vote, why change it?

[ECrownofFire]

Except that this isn't the best way to vote. Especially for anything that is mutually exclusive of the other.

[dragnar]

I thought it was one positive or negative vote... if you get one of each everyone has essentially two votes.

[xtank5]

I thought it was one positive or negative vote... if you get one of each everyone has essentially two votes.

That was addressed here and here.

[ECrownofFire]

I still think it's pointless to go against something at all. We should just have votes for actions and combinations of actions.

[omagaalpha]

here when system was put in

Code: (Proposed Actions) [Select]

[vote for it][vote agaist it]-description
[4]-Raid Scrapyard, look for sheet metal.
[4-1]-Purchase canned/Non-perishable food. (Canned tomatoes, peaches, tomato paste, mushrooms, pasta, etc)
[3]-Make or purchase metal propellers.
[3]-Register for library card.  Check out books on SCIENCE!!, surf internet for SCIENCE!! related jobs, useful information, etc.
[3]-Obtain wheelbarrow or shopping cart.  (Cheaper is better)
[2]-Get drugstore chemicals.  (Rubbing alcohol, peroxide, mineral oil, etc)
[2]-Buy cheap travel alarm clocks from dollar store.  Modify to be intruder alarms. (Details below)   Sell to gangs.

Here we go - we now have an official creator-endorsed format.

They should be arranged top to bottom by final number, descending. Higher-number-minus-antivotes before high-number-minus-fewer-antivotes before no antivotes. As a demonstration: [6] [6-1] [5] [6-2] [5-1] [4] [3] [2] [2] [2] [1]

Does not say that it is limit 1 postive(for) and/or 1 negative(against) for entire choices there for unless post saids from Pandarsenic other wise I am going with rule that for each issue you can only vote for or against it.

[Pandarsenic]

http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=51651.msg1424110#msg1424110

For/against/abstain on each matter is fine.

[xtank5]

Hey Pandar, do we have running water in our lab?

[Diablous]

Are we going to get the old title back?

[RAM]

ECNEICS! tuothiw eltit a gnitsetorp me is sith!

[dragnar]

ECNEICS! tuothiw eltit a gnitsetorp me is sith!

*fatal sanity error*

Yesterday upon the stair, I met a man who wasn't there. He wasn't there again today, oh how I wish he'd go away.

[Sean Mirrsen]

If "CONSISTENT UPDATES" had one more "C" in them, it could be anagrammed to "DAT NUT POSTS SCIENCE!"

But, without an extra "C", this title is worthless.

[RAM]

ECNEICS! tuothiw eltit a gnitsetorp me is sith!
*fatal sanity error*

Yesterday upon the stair, I met a man who wasn't there. He wasn't there again today, oh how I wish he'd go away.

[ECrownofFire]

That backwards isn't completely backwards...