Well, I couldn't draw our dear brachius to my satisfaction... Yea, I'm not too good with names, either. That's why my cat is just Cat (should I even capitalize that?). But burger, xwingus and donutsaur sort of work, don't they. As the critters become more complex and, hopefully, strange, they're going to present some trouble for associations, though. Like brachius. Eight-armed critter makes it too much octopus. Octobrachius isn't visual enough. Eh. Fiddlesticks, inspiration.
Anyway, I still imagine it wearing two shell bits, protecting its top and bottom. They're probably much more curved than in the rhombus, because they have to accommodate for the arms and the proboscises. Or in some places they've fused together. Maybe if I could visualize exactly how the inside and the arms of this critter look and work, I could be more definite about the shape of the shell. I take it a jet doesn't have to be especially large to create decent speed. I've just looked at an image of a squid's anatomy, and it's like a compact balloon. But the tentacles are pretty thick... I've just got a pretty scary idea. So, suppose brachius in default position keeps its hands in the front, forming a shape of a cone with them. But when it approaches a prey, it opens the cone up and sort of slides over the prey. This way it doesn't have to expend a lot of energy jumping at the prey from a distance, and ensnaring it... Scary because from outside it would appear pretty peaceful - a brachius gracefully sliding over a donutsaur. But then brachius uses its proboscises!
I've just watched Cameron's Avatar (I had to know finally why so much bad rap, and I wasn't disappointed), and, you know, I wish I had so many people running 3D here for this project. This is just sad. They've fallen leagues short of the potential of their biological concept - a sort of brain-hive-world. All they have to show is half-a-dozen species whose only connection to the hive is a flimsy cord. Completely identical in every species, at that. Like the world was terraformed and gene-engineered some time in the past.
However, the movie has born something good, possibly, inside me. Or maybe stupid. You know, if this project finally gained momentum some time, it could be cool to try to turn famous fictional worlds with inane biology, into something coherent. Take the core concept and build a world based off it. If I understand the core concept of Pandora (I don't think it's cute kitties, by the way), it would be first to try to connect the world into a network using some species. And I even know who could be used for that on this Ark - the lump on the shore. The way I've come to imagine it, is already kind of utopian - its body gives shelter to many species of microorganisms - part of them photosynthesise on the upper surface, another part consume minerals on the bottom. Its "tail" is submerged in water for hydration. The tail consists of many thin "tentacles", similar to the root of a plant, but I guess it could even feed on microorganisms in the water. What if you just prolong the "tentacles", and make a colony out of many lumps around a shore?
Edit: Hm, come think of it, a network of goodness encompassing a whole planet is an inane concept in itself - a single dominant species - no competition - no evolution - where'd Na'vi come from?