Nice, I'm guilty of answering Org, and not answering siquo. That's fair?
Your vote's already on me Siquo, no need to vote a second time.
I needed to get your attention.
Your accusation is absurd.
Speaking of things bad for town, siquo, stop discussing your post with HFS and post something.
You only started posting after this. Org, too, has constantly pointed out your lurkiness.
I only saw the entire thread after that. Right now my RL schedule allows me about two updates per day, and keep in mind we might be in different timezones.
Haha, you even accused Org of being too active! How do you reconcile that with calling me lurky now?
Easy, everything out of the ordinary is... strange enough to investigate. Too much and too little are weird. Too average is weird, too, before you get any ideas.
I only see one good reason you would continue to press such an absurd attack.
I see a different one, and you know it.
But then there's this.
Unvote
I support a nolynch this round.
To all: I know, I know, the "experienced players" are saying that's a bad thing. But they have not been paying attention. BM7 had several no-lynches, including Day 1, and was (let me emphasize)
the first BM where town won.
Even the IC's were astounded. Which led me to two conclusions: 1. Experienced player means Jack Shit. 2. Any "experienced player" who has been paying attention to BM7 knows that a Day1 No-lynch can be a good thing for town. Being overly
against it, is, as of now in my book very suspicious. Suspicious enough to warrant a lynch, even.
Unvote
Vote OrgAs to the irony:
Wifom is a major scumtell, so major and blatantly obvious even that I distrust the ones who are NOT spreading it, since they are apparently very careful to hide it. I found that it's very hard to post anything without any kind of WIFOM, and was almost lynched for it multiple times in BM7.