Seriously, you haven't done anything to point out anyone as scum. Mephansteras as scum? Really? No. Not likely, at least. Mephansteras has a way about him when he's scum.
Now you say I didn't point anyone out as scum but turn around and say you don't like the person I pointed out as scum.
Because you HAD to point at someone. Therefore, you're going to point at someone who might appear passive, and then try to throw on evidence later. Mephansteras is always a good target for that, because he's always busy.
You may not LIKE the idea of Meph being the Cybrid, but it doesn't change the fact that he is and that I've targeted him. You not LIKING my choice doesn't mean I didn't make a choice.
What is your main argument for him being Cybrid? Passiveness? Weak attack? Your mother?
No no. You're not doing anything useful. You're trying to look like you are, but you're not, and won't ever. Mostly because you're going to go after an easy lynch.
So now I AM going after someone but they are an 'easy lynch'.
You're not really going after them. You can't go after someone if you're the real someone they're going after. You can only try to make everyone believe it's him and not you.
I go after the person who looks the most scummy. Meph is passive, lurkerhunting, votes out of reaction-little else-and is content to wait it out to the next day, which is when the cybrid threat becomes much more uglier.
I'm glad you jumped off of Meph to randomvote Apostolic Nihilist. That shows how dedicated you were to voting him. I mean, give him some room to breath? That'll alleviate some of the suspicion he has on you. Why the heck not?
So, you're blaming him for voting for a lurker when you were initially doing so?
Apostolic was still deemed as active at the time of my post. Everyone else I voted on has been very active.
The first part of this answer was acceptable, even if Apostolic wasn't really posting. The second part completely destroyed the entire thing as a legitimate answer. It means you're backpedaling.
What blatant double standards you set. You yourself weren't even going for Mephansteras until you saw he was weakly attacking. He's not the scum, I'm afraid, but it's a nice shot.
I wasn't going after Meph until after he attacked?
My first post was against him. My second post poked at others while I waited for his answer. My third post was in reply to his attack, his response to my question, and his theorycrafting.
I assume people that jump off of their target aren't really going after them. You have an FoS for a reason. Taking your vote off of someone makes the entire pressure thing worthless. You know that.
Watch, I'll poke others right now:
Archangel! Why have you only posted to vote for me with little evidence? Was it a bandwagon vote?
Isn't that what you were trying to convey?
But now I get it. Your REAL problem is that I'm after Meph who you feel isn't scum. Instead of defending him, you're attacking me. I was wondering what got in your bonnet.
You'd have to actually be attacking him in order for that to be true. I also feel like Meph isn't scum (At least not the Cybrid kind), so I will use how you attack him as evidence against you.
You know the stance I get at this point. I DO listen to other people's arguments. To ME Meph is scum full and true. If you have any knowledge of him (and it sounds like you do) then speak up instead of assuming "OMG he's trying to kill a townie.. he's SCUM!"
So, you're saying that he's scum unless I have proof otherwise. Which means you're rolefishing and going to go after Mephansteras regardless of what evidence there is, because it's just too tough to switch now.
Btw, I extended because there's still more to discuss, and there's too many trying to sleep through
this deal. Besides, without that extension we would've ended in a no lynch.
This is true, and it's quite obvious.
Meanwhile:
yes, I'd very much be content with an inspection.
Well, I'd do that, but it seems I cannot.