Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[dakarian]

So basically you are using me a your own personal fighting robot.

Scum says: "Yah, what that guy said.. he's right!"

scum tends to love buddying, then turning on the buddy if the buddy doesn't follow suit.  Works well...sometimes.

[Neruz]

So basically you are using me a your own personal fighting robot.

No, i'm saying that you suddenly dropping your case on Org, despite yourself saying that you weren't going to let him get away with the "Org is Org" defense anymore looks really goddamn suspicious.

[dakarian]

Great.  Now you have to prove that I'm pulling back due to me thinking it's "org being org".


Because last I checked, it was because he actually answered my issues except for the Doc claim and I opted not to lynch for only one scumtell since the 'wait and see' will be enough to net me more if needed.

But you know my argument more.. especially since it's your ONLY reason for wanting Org dead.  You can explain better than I how I'm just saying "org is org" and walking away.

[Neruz]

But you know my argument more.. especially since it's your ONLY reason for wanting Org dead.  You can explain better than I how I'm just saying "org is org" and walking away.

Sigh, stop trying to twist my words dakarian. I said i agreed with you, not that your argument was the only reason for wanting Org dead. Right now Org is being his usual self, i'm not willing to accept that, because recent games tell me that Org has gotten smart enough to take advantage of that.

I find the fact that you noted the same thing, but apparantly discarded it, Org's really terrible role claim and his rolefishing to be highly suspicious and very unlike you. This is further reinforced when i remember the last time you did this, i called you out on it, you responded that i was incorrect and that i was completely wrong about your meta, and then you flipped scum.


Now i'm pretty sure you're not stupid enough to do that while town, which means you either decided to try the same trick because it worked last time (which is reasonable enough) or you're deliberately trying to get lynched. Since the latter is WIFOM, i'll stick with the former.

[Mr.Person]

If you suspect someone but you don't have anything else to use against them and you don't have enough to fully lynch them with, you pull back and watch.  This is especially if you have only one scumtell on them.  If they are scum, they'll give out more.  If not, you'll see it and be able to fully let go.  However, sometimes you get more from watching them attack than making them repeat the same thing over and over.

I could of sworn it was you who kept advocating that you push people until you get something out of them, but again, maybe you've changed your playstyle in the past week or two. Now you're advocating being passive and just watching people? That WOULD work great, except that you're forgetting that some people, like Org, lurk. A lot. And when Org does post, he posts shit that's hard to read. A lot. You're advocating doing something that will give Org a chance to lurk on top of giving up an opportunity to get some information out of Org. Why are you passing this up? There are SEVERAL hard hitting questions you could throw at Org, yet nobody does so.

@Org

No, you don't get the 'org is org' defense anymore.  I had a lovely time seeing it used while you're scum.  Now, instead of meta, I'm using natural methods to hunt on you.

QUOTES FROM ME LOL

Org, do you have some kind of post restriction that prevents you from speaking in a normal manner? If so, please describe it. You don't have to say why, you just have to say the restrictions you're going to be following.

Are you trying to tell us something in an obtuse way? I see a strange pattern, lot's of third person but also several first person usage to refer to another person.

[Jim Groovester]

I think this whole dakarian letting off Org easy thing is a little blown out of proportion.

Would one of the interested parties point to a post where dakarian supposedly let Org off easy? As far as I can see, the comment originally applied to dakarian's response to Solfuge's early claim of murdering ToonyMan. dakarian, as far as I see it, has been decently tough on Org.

Could somebody help me out here?


Also, Unvote Org for the moment. Leafsnail is complete and total scum. My finely tuned scum detector is beeping furiously at his behavior.

Leafsnail, since you're scum, would you explain your early vote on Cheeetar?

I may be repeating myself, but you're fishing for scum tells. Things that you can blow out of proportion to get a townie lynched. Or maybe things you can point out to say you've been scum hunting. In any case, that's what you did with Cheeetar, and that's what you're doing with me.

[Org]

But you know my argument more.. especially since it's your ONLY reason for wanting Org dead.  You can explain better than I how I'm just saying "org is org" and walking away.

Sigh, stop trying to twist my words dakarian. I said i agreed with you, not that your argument was the only reason for wanting Org dead. Right now Org is being his usual self, i'm not willing to accept that, because recent games tell me that Org has gotten smart enough to take advantage of that.

I find the fact that you noted the same thing, but apparantly discarded it, Org's really terrible role claim and his rolefishing to be highly suspicious and very unlike you. This is further reinforced when i remember the last time you did this, i called you out on it, you responded that i was incorrect and that i was completely wrong about your meta, and then you flipped scum.


Now i'm pretty sure you're not stupid enough to do that while town, which means you either decided to try the same trick because it worked last time (which is reasonable enough) or you're deliberately trying to get lynched. Since the latter is WIFOM, i'll stick with the former.

LOL

[Jim Groovester]

Would one of the interested parties point to a post where dakarian supposedly let Org off easy?

Wait, never mind. I see it.

The Doc bugs me.. bugs me horribly.  Everything else was answered though.  The doc claim nags at me so I'm going to give hi a LITTLE more stew time while I get a read on others before I finish with him.  I believe if he's scum I'll have more to use in due time.

Continue with your questioning, then. Just be careful to not get too worked up over it; I still think this whole situation is a tad blown out of proportion.

Also, as a general question, there are two scum, but are third parties a possibility in this game?

[webadict]

My role says "If somebody asks you something, you cannot tell the truth", i'm assuming that means in answer to the question, rather than forever after.

Well... THIS should be fun!

What isn't your role name?
What isn't your win condition?
What isn't your role's full description?

[Solifuge]

Web, if that's being used as a scum test, he could just answer with any of the things that aren't true. Of which there are infinite. Borrowing a page from the Labyrinth here.

Neruz, are you town?
Neruz, if I was able to check your alignment, would I see that you were town?

[Neruz]

Web, if that's being used as a scum test, he could just answer with any of the things that aren't true. Of which there are infinite. Borrowing a page from the Labyrinth here.

He asked what my role name was not, the only way i can lie and answer the question is by telling him what my role name is and saying that it is not my role name.

What isn't your role name?

My role name is not Jim Carrey

What isn't your win condition?

My win condition is not Town

What isn't your role's full description?

My role's full description is not "You are Jim Carrey. By some weird power, your sons birthday wish has made it to where can only lie. This only applies to direct questions. If somebody asks you something, you cannot tell the truth."

Neruz, are you town?

No, i am a Jester.

Neruz, if I was able to check your alignment, would I see that you were town?

No, you would see that i am Mafia.

[Solifuge]

Information is good, but I tend to dislike this kind of exploitation. Seems unsporting.

[Solifuge]

Would have been an Edit:
I misunderstood the role thing, from lack of reading; I thought it was forced truth-telling. Back for more fun times after a night of rest and all that.

[Neruz]

There's not really any information to be had here. You can't prove that i'm telling the truth about my post restriction; the only way to prove that i am lying about it is to catch me answering a direct question truthfully and not getting modkilled, and the only way to prove that i am telling the truth about it is to catch me answering a direct question truthfully and getting modkilled.

Neither outcome is helpful to me.

[Cheeetar]

This statement is a lie.

Neruz, is the above statement a lie or the truth?

DONT USE META.

Alright then. I'm voting Org for Refuge in Audacity.