Nah, Howard was better. Rudd just went and gave the entire treasury to the public as an economic stimulous
Seriously, how does giving everyone 1-3k help the economy once they've spent it. And most people just put it in the bank.
No he didn't. Not 3k, more like $950. And only to people earning less than 80k/p.a. Lets not forget massive infrastructure spending and upgrades too.
Rudd just exists to spend money, at least howard had some restraint
Howard only got that money through the mining boom, and he expected that to continue (it did not). What would have Howard done if he was in power?
He would either spend it like Rudd, or hold onto it, causing us to slide further into depression. Simply, because of Rudds spending we are better [economically] of than we were if he did not.
However Rudd did alot of things that were not good. One of the main problem he has is pretending that Australia is a world power (read: all those damn summits).
But I do not care how much you think Howard was better than Rudd. Howard was not that great of a Prime Minister, yet we had him for
Eleven Years. His policies were outdated. The Australian people simply needed change.
laptops for schools programs, 70% of teachers don't know their way around computers, at least not well enough to use them for classwork, coupled with the security so weak it can be bypassed by clicking run as administrator it leads to the laptops not being used for educational purposes most of the time.
Actually, I find that this year the teachers are using laptops alot more, perhaps not to their fullest extent, but they're making use of them.
God damn I hate handwriting.
God damn.