On the "good and evil" discussion: imagine a line where we define the +x direction as good and the -x direction as evil. Now add another line perpendicular to that line, and on it define the +y direction as good, and the -y direction as evil. Where we had two "categories", we now have four, and thus there is are (evil, evil)(good, good)(evil, good) and (good, evil) areas. So of course, we add another axis to our quickly forming grid, giving us the wonders of three Cartesian dimensions, and eight categories, including such gems as (good, evil, good)(evil, good, evil)(evil, evil, good)(good, good, evil)(good, evil, evil)(evil, good, good)(good, good, good) and finally (evil, evil, evil) [it sounds like we aught to avoid that last one, doesn't it?]. To finish this particular mental exercise, add an axis for every habit (and opinion) in existence, then calculate an approximate number of categories.
Did that image crash your brain? Of course not, since no sane or reasonable person would try to process it, and those with neither attribute would soon* be interrupted by those who are. However, doesn't that particular method of recording information, just the categories, remind you of something? If not my track change?
For my next trick, I sit here wondering how the thought "absolutes like good an evil are general directions. You can't measure a general direction" turned into the above and below post. And there! I have realized the answer with my phantasmal 1/5 ratio of sleep/wake!
*Before they starve to death.