Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[GlyphGryph]

Near as I can telll, its
Agigak [1]: inteuniso
Rolan7 [1]: Dorf
ExKirby [1]: GlyphGryph
inteuniso [1]: Errol
Therion [1]: Halmie
GlyphGryph [1]: Therion
dorf [2]: Rolan7, ExKirby

Which is pretty bad.

[GlyphGryph]

At least it wont be a no lynch though.

[Rolan7]

I was almost regretting asking for an extension, since I'm starting to feel a bit burnt out already.  But I thought with Inteuniso and dorf tied, one of them would randomly be lynched (first post reading fail).  If a tie is a no lynch...

If someone posts a last moment vote causing a tie and nolynch, I will heavily suspect them of being mafia.  That makes sense to everyone right?

I can hardly wait until 15:00 PST, 18:00 my time, when we'll finally finish this day.

[Rolan7]

I just remembered!  Dorf tried to vote ExKirby but didn't unvote first.  I wager he's waiting until the last moment to correct his vote.  Why?  Because then it'll be a tie and we'll have no lynch!

Please, anyone, we need just one more vote on dorf.  Otherwise we'll have no lynch and a nightkill, and these extensions will have been for nothing.

[dakarian]

Edit: Went back from the beginning and ran the count from the first post to here.  NOW this is the official vote count:

Dorf[2]: Rolan7, ExKirby,
Rolan7[1]: dorf,
GlyphGryph[1]: Therion
Akigagak[1]: inteuniso,
ExKirby[1]: GlyphGryph
inteuniso[1]: Errol,
Therion[1]: Halmie,

Deadline: 3pm PST

Dorf didn't unvote when he voted for ExKirby so he's on Rolan still.

[Rolan7]

Dakarian, that can't be right.  I changed my vote to dorf early on.  SirBayer made the same mistake, I wonder why.

To be safe,
unvote
vote dorf

Am I really the only one voting dorf?  I'm going to do my own count, results soon.

[dakarian]

Rerun and now official vote count has been made 2 posts above this one.

[Rolan7]

Well, this is rather moot since Dakarian recounted and got the correct amounts.  But at least I can attest to their correctness (:

Important: I was right before, dorf or another mafia can cause a no-lynch by voting for any of the 6 people with 1 vote.  Then they just nightkill someone, and we're that much weaker.  Since dorf is in the lead, please, someone else vote him!  Otherwise he WILL repeat his attempt to vote ExKirby and save his hide.

A brief history of the game:

Spoiler (click to show/hide)

*Page 1*
inteuniso -> errol
Halmie -> dorf
Rolan7 -> Halmie

*Page 2*
ExKirby -> Rolan7
Rolan7 (Halmie) -> dorf
Errol -> GlyphGryph
Therion -> Halmie
Halmie (dorf) -> Agikak
dorf -> Rolan7

*Page 3*
Therion (Halmie) -> none
Halmie (Agikak) -> dorf
GlyphGryph -> ExKirby

*Page 4*
SirBayer [incorrect votecount]
ExKirby (Rolan7) -> Errol
Errol (GlyphGryph) -> inteuniso
inteuniso (errol) -> none

*Page 5*
inteuniso -> Rolan7
Halmie (Agikak) -> inteuniso
Rolan7 [wall 'o text proving dorf guilty]

*Page 6*
Votecount from SirBayer, still wrong but no one noticed yet ):
Therion -> GlyphGryph
Rolan7 [points out a votecount mistake]
SirBayer [CORRECT VOTECOUNT]

*Page 7*
ExKirby [pokes justified fun at SirBayer]
inteuniso (Rolan7) -> Errol
dorf [trIES to vote ExKirby but doesn't unvote first]

*Page 8-9*
[Extension voting, barely passes]
ExKirby (Errol) -> dorf
Rolan7 [incorrect votecount, whoops, and mock SirBayer]
ExKirby [points out my votecount mistake]

*Page 10*
Rolan7 [CORRECT VOTECOUNT]
inteuniso (Errol) -> Akigagak

*Page 11*
Halmie (inteuniso) -> Therion

*Page 12*
GlyphGryph [CORRECT VOTECOUNT]
dakarian [OFFICIAL CORRECT VOTECOUNT after edit]

[SirBayer]

Official Vote-count - wait. Dak already did it. Huh.

Well, I'll catch up. Totally got slammed trying to get into Biology class. 22/30 on the Waitlist, only two open seats. :I

[GlyphGryph]

No. Don't vote him. Strategically, the plan is simple - if anyone forces a no-lynch, they are scum.

Technically, Dorf could and say he just wants to prevent us from making a mistake, but if he's a townie he wouldn't want to - it means we'd waste tomorrow trying to kill him for forcing a no-lynch, and then we'd lose TWO lynches instead of just one.

So the situation as it stands is fine, since identifying mafia IS worth a no-lynch, and its likely that any forced no-lynch will be by a mafia member at this point.

[Akigagak]

As I'd also prefer a lynch to a no-lynch, I'm not going to vote today.
There isn't really much to add that hasn't been said before.

[Errol]

Wait damn I just remembered I wanted to do an thorough examination of thread followed by vote better start now sorry

[Rolan7]

No. Don't vote him. Strategically, the plan is simple - if anyone forces a no-lynch, they are scum.

Technically, Dorf could and say he just wants to prevent us from making a mistake, but if he's a townie he wouldn't want to - it means we'd waste tomorrow trying to kill him for forcing a no-lynch, and then we'd lose TWO lynches instead of just one.

So the situation as it stands is fine, since identifying mafia IS worth a no-lynch, and its likely that any forced no-lynch will be by a mafia member at this point.

Excellent point, you've convinced me.  No townies should vote today, unless a mafia member tries to force a no-lynch.

Errol, please don't vote now if you're town.

[Akigagak]

Errol has already voted.

Did you mean me?

[SirBayer]

Editted for font. Not against any rules because I'm technically not playing.[/font]

Captain Webadict finds a knife in his spine for no apparent reason.

Dakarian, that can't be right.  I changed my vote to dorf early on.  SirBayer made the same mistake, I wonder why.

Because we just don't care.