Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[ExKirby]

*cough cough Org cough cough*

[dakarian]

ICs don't earn E Ranks for flaking here.

Though I'll take not of who was and was not reliable when the next BM happens and I need new ICs

[Rolan7]

...My vote's on dorf.

Ack, sorry.  Now I feel bad for being hard on SirBayer, lol.

Very Unofficial Votecount:
Errol [1]: inteuniso
Rolan7 [1]: Dorf
ExKirby [1]: GlyphGryph
inteuniso [2]: Errol, Halmie
GlyphGryph [1]: Therion
dorf [2]: Rolan7, ExKirby

Why would anyone vote for an extension when 5 out of 9 people already have?

I retain the ability to hurry the deadline for inactivity or extend the deadline if enough request it.

SirBayer didn't promise to extend the day just because a slight majority requested it.  Besides, posting to request an extension is less hassle than tallying up the requests.  So anyone who counted the requests, found a slim majority, then didn't request the extension probably didn't want the extension much. 
I thought we already had a majority when I made my request, I didn't know mine was the deciding vote.

[Errol]

Just for the record, I am not supporting another extension. I personally witnessed the negative effects of an extension in BM6, where the town ran out of juice on a twice-extended day 3. There won't be much more to discuss anyway.

And, due to the reasons dakarian stated, refraining from jumping on the extension bandwagon is not a crime per se.

Lynch is needed, no lynch just helps scum. That point remains unquestioned.

As for my inaction... I'm waiting for Halmie to answer my question. I'm going to cast my suspicion-based, final vote tomorrow, when I hopefully have a better read on people.

[ExKirby]

Errol, can you answer my question? Or do I need to dig it out?

[Errol]

The thing with the benefit of the doubt...? In my opinion, you should let both sides speak. It's what a good judge does, and you want your real vote to be thought out, highly so. And, in this case, my doubts were correct, as Rolan doesn't seem to be scum.

[Org]

Yeah. Geez. School is hard with AP classes. I have an 82 in stats on my report card though. Yay.

Ermm. Ill read up. One minute plox.

[webadict]

Thats not a quote of anything I've ever encountered. The quote that's always thrown around is the best defense is a good attack. Occasionally Attack is the best defense, and the best defense is offense.

If all you're doing is defending, then all you're doing is trying to stay alive. To deflect attacks to anyone but yourself. Interesting that this is a similiar theme in your "spread out and attack multiple people" angle. After all, it doesn't really matter who else gets taken down, does it? Since you're scum, any town will do.

Newbies tend to defend themselves. It happens a lot, actually, and focusing on that is stupid.

And yes, you guys just need to agree faster. Though, if you guys were going to listen to me, this game would've been at Night by now .

It's not about bandwagoning. It's about making decisions fast. If you are undecided, it's only going to ruin the game. If you get it wrong, it happens. Don't let it bog you down too much.

So, start looking at what OTHERS say and making decisions. It's helpful to tag onto other arguments. If you honestly feel that the other people aren't scum, then feel free to search. But, having everyone attack everyone does very little, because everyone will focus on that.

Editted for font. Not against any rules because I'm technically not playing.

[GlyphGryph]

If it's generally agreed to be our best bet, I'm willing inteuniso.

I haven't seen much evidence he's scum, but that's because he's lurking something terrible. Even if he turns out to be town, lurkers late game are damaging and he seems to be the least active player. And he might be scum - there's just no real way to tell.

[GlyphGryph]

I'd prefer a lynch against Therion or ExKirby, though - and if inteuniso makes a lot of contributions during the extension there's a good chance he'll be safe from my vote.

So start talking and hunting, you!

[GlyphGryph]

Reviewing his posts, he does seem pretty scummy - he's concerned about appearances, very hesitant with his vote, trying to lay low. But there's not a lot to go on...

So Halmie, why is that he got top spot on your list, while other people who've posted already only got a no good read description?

[inteuniso]

Thanks for your answer, Errol. I was just suspicious as to why you voted me.

Unvote

It also seems the only one to have not voted.

Yes, you have, Akigagak. And no one has seemed to have put a lot of pressure on you to explain why you STILL have not.


Also, it seems that not only have you not voted, you haven't even really scumhunted.

Explain yourself.

[Org]

Where's webby

[webadict]

Where's webby

Right here. Where are you?

[Therion]

It was Errol that voted me, and I didn't shower him with questions and suspicions because he actually asked me questions and tried to scum hunt (a bit). But it doesn't matter, anyways. You're the one spewing scumtells, not him. It doesn't mean he's in the clear, of course. But the fact that you're trying to divert onto someone else without even bothering to look it up and confirm reeks of scum.

Plus, if you thought Rolan was voting on me, that means you WERE lying when you said you only voted me because I had no votes. So which is?

And I didn't ignore you because I'm scumhunting. That's why. And you're vote on me was scum-shaped. Why would I ignore a scumtell? Do YOU think I should have ignored you?

Answer me this, if nothing else:
What sort of response were you actually EXPECTING from a vote with no reasoning or question?

Erm, oops. Confused the names a little bit over there.
Well... the 'no questions' issue sounds rather fair. I was wrong in that matter. I voted on you for I saw no _actual_ voters against you; your previous voter had unvoted. I thought voting on one with no votes would be a nice start.
Once again, the non-questioned vote was my mistake.