Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 914 915 [916] 917 918 ... 1347

Author Topic: Aurora - The Dwarf Fortress of 4X Games  (Read 2846626 times)

Ehndras

  • Bay Watcher
  • Voidwalker
    • View Profile
Re: Aurora - The Dwarf Fortress of 4X Games
« Reply #13725 on: July 29, 2013, 09:54:47 am »

Playing Aurora for the first time in two years, just re-installed. Have there been any updates in said timespan?

I'm playing on Windows 8 and really hoping Aurora will run.
Logged
Quote from: Yoink
You're never too old to enjoy flying body parts.  
Quote from: Vector
Ehndras, you are the prettiest man I have ever seen
Quote from: Dorsidwarf
"I am a member of Earth. I enjoy to drink the water. In Earth we have an internal skeleton."

Metalax

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
    • Steam Profile
Re: Aurora - The Dwarf Fortress of 4X Games
« Reply #13726 on: July 29, 2013, 12:01:00 pm »

Yep, several. Current version is 6.2. This thread covers the major changes made.

Big changes are, new engine design; greatly increased fuel useage in general; changes to civilian shipping ship designs and automated retirement/replacement of ships; introduction of crew morale and new accommodation system system; redone Sol system with more accurate asteroids/trojans/comets/dwarf planets; orders for loading/unloading minerals to reserve levels allowing for automated freighter runs; geological survey team survey system has changed.
Logged
In the beginning was the word, and the word was "Oops!"

Carnwennan

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Aurora - The Dwarf Fortress of 4X Games
« Reply #13727 on: July 30, 2013, 05:37:40 pm »

Genned an NPR on Mars in my new game. Peaceful for a while. We even had a trade agreement (at least, I did). They just opened fire on one of my geosurvey ships. Enslavement time.

They..... appear to be relatively low tech? However, my navy at the moment is abysmal. How do you think this would fare?:
Spoiler (click to show/hide)

I also have two of these:
Spoiler (click to show/hide)

and like 6 of these:
Spoiler (click to show/hide)

In terms of what sort of naval power they have:
They have a battleship of 16k tons of which I have only ever seen one, and that was at the very start- when I genned them;
Three cargo ships;
Three laser PDCs with 27x lasers each, 10cm since they do 3 points of damage;
Two PDCs which do something else, not sure. Never saw them fire;
One ship which has the same thermal signature as the battleship.
Another ship that goes 2.5k km/s and has a larger thermal signature than anything else.

Fakeedit: Looks like they were all FACs. I was worrying when I saw a thermal of 360. Then I realized mine was 2k. Haven't run into that 'battleship'. Might well have been a cargo ship for all I know.

Edit: (changed some wording and added stuff to make more sense). Completely smashed that last ship -the one going 2.5k km/s- out of the sky. Turns out, you can't to jack when an attacking ship can travel twice as fast as you can, and can launch missiles that travel almost four times faster than they in turn can. I considered capturing it, since I got it dead in the water with the second volley, but I didn't really know how to so whatever.

Planetary bombardment time?

« Last Edit: July 30, 2013, 05:51:59 pm by Carnwennan »
Logged

Rez

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Aurora - The Dwarf Fortress of 4X Games
« Reply #13728 on: July 30, 2013, 06:17:53 pm »

Why not blockade the planet until you have troop transports?
Logged

Carnwennan

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Aurora - The Dwarf Fortress of 4X Games
« Reply #13729 on: July 30, 2013, 06:44:43 pm »

Why not blockade the planet until you have troop transports?
I don't think I have enough ships to do that. My navy consists of literally just that ship design I posted, as well as, you know, freighters and stuff. I tried to do something similar, cutting them off from a colony (I think they have one in the Oort cloud for whatever reason) by terrorizing their shipping lines. I would have to keep pulling my ship out to reload ordinance, since I don't have so much as a collier.
Logged

Flying Dice

  • Bay Watcher
  • inveterate shitposter
    • View Profile
Re: Aurora - The Dwarf Fortress of 4X Games
« Reply #13730 on: July 30, 2013, 06:48:09 pm »

Just a few minor notes:

That CL design doesn't have near enough AMMs or Size 1 launchers to be an effective missile defense, though the missiles themselves aren't terrible for your TL. You might want to consider splitting the next generation into missile ships and anti-missile ships, especially if you're going to build them that small. As a general rule of thumb for low-mid TL design you should usually avoid Jack-of-all-trades designs. Medium-sized and larger ships (>30k tons by my norms) and high tech ships can fill multiple roles effectively; the smaller and lower-tech you go, the less efficient it becomes.

Also, 2 points of shield is completely pointless. Just about anything in the game apart from a single low-tech AMM or a low-tech 10cm laser at extreme range will pop that with a single shot, and it's taking up tonnage that could go into pretty much anything else. On the flip side, it could use more armor (unless everything you're fighting is slower than you and doesn't use missiles).

Why does the active sensor have a third of the range of the ASM fire control and a bit more than a fourth of the range of the missiles themselves? Why are there two active sensors? Your ships should always have an AS range at least equal to the effective range of their fire controls (barring special cases such as fighters and FACs that rely on spotter ships for sensor coverage), and having a bit extra helps reduce the effects of enemy ECM. Also, such a high resolution is only really useful if you take advantage of the fact that it gives you a higher maximum range. I mean, shit, a lowest-possible-tech 100res 50 ton active sensor has nearly half the range of that one.


On an unrelated note, you don't need fuel on your defense satellites.


Re: Blockading: Do you know how many shipyards they have? If you've already killed their mobile fleet you should ignore their commercial shipping; if/when you conquer them on the ground those ships (along with their other assets) will fall under your control, which is useful even if you just scrap them.
Logged


Aurora on small monitors:
1. Game Parameters -> Reduced Height Windows.
2. Lock taskbar to the right side of your desktop.
3. Run Resize Enable

Carnwennan

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Aurora - The Dwarf Fortress of 4X Games
« Reply #13731 on: July 30, 2013, 07:25:00 pm »

Quote
That CL design doesn't have near enough AMMs or Size 1 launchers to be an effective missile defense...
This is the first time I have ever had to use military, and have managed to actually hit something with a missile. I honestly didn't know how much to use and I guess I underestimated, huh. Mocked up an anti-ship design and an anti-missile one, for deployment together. I have done the same with the orbiting missile defense bases.
Quote
Medium-sized and larger ships (>30k tons by my norms) and high tech ships can fill multiple roles effectively; the smaller and lower-tech you go, the less efficient it becomes.
Haaaah, and here I was thinking 10k was huge :P. Gonna need to seriously up the number and size of my shipyards...
Quote
Also, 2 points of shield is completely pointless...
Huh, I thought it meant adding two layers to my hull depth when active. Good to know, I wondered why they were so light.
Quote
Why does the active sensor have a third of the range of the ASM fire control and a bit more than a fourth of the range of the missiles themselves?
My active sensors are literal crap. Trying to boost them up now. I figured that they needed a little fiddling when I had to get within 10m km to fire the missiles, when they whould be able to fire 3x as far, as you said. I was thinking that AS missiles should have longer ranges to deal with fleeing ships, hence the higher range.
Quote
Why are there two active sensors?
For redundancy, in the event one gets broken?
Quote
Also, such a high resolution is only really useful if you take advantage of the fact that it gives you a higher maximum range.I mean, shit...
It nearly is a minimum tech, 50ton active sensor. My research in that field is dreadful. Fixing!

I left it at 5000 res because that is what the game defaults the size to when you open the screen, so I presumed it was an average size  :-\ (I also based the sizes of my ships off of this).
Quote
On an unrelated note, you don't need fuel on your defense satellites.
Huh, didn't notice that. Fixed! Thanks.
Quote
Do you know how many shipyards...
I saw one when I was testing their AMM coverage (which doesn't seem to exist). Didn't know that you took over hostile ships... if I killed the home settlement would the colony flip too?

E: tfw game interrupts when you find a new jump point, but not on combat (RIP CL-Vanquisher)
« Last Edit: July 30, 2013, 08:00:44 pm by Carnwennan »
Logged

gimlet

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Aurora - The Dwarf Fortress of 4X Games
« Reply #13732 on: July 30, 2013, 07:27:16 pm »

Also your Missile Defense Base and Cruiser don't have a Resolution 1 sensor - and just for yuks I personally would put at least a tiny/cheap Resolution 1 sensor on the Beam Base, so it could at least do final fire.  (Or are non-meson beam weapons useless firing from planets because of the atmosphere?  It's been a long time since I built any non-meson PDCs so I don't remember).

On your ship, it's a BIT risky to only have 1 reactor and 1 beam fire control - a lucky meson hit or penetrating hit can render that whole expensive weapons suite combat ineffective.  Same tip for fuel and magazines.  And a bit more missile stowage - it's amazing how fast they run out.  Consider using smaller missiles so you can get more per volley, you really need to overwhelm their point defense with big volleys otherwise none will get through.

Logged

Flying Dice

  • Bay Watcher
  • inveterate shitposter
    • View Profile
Re: Aurora - The Dwarf Fortress of 4X Games
« Reply #13733 on: July 30, 2013, 09:06:17 pm »

-snip-
Quote
Do you know how many shipyards...
I saw one when I was testing their AMM coverage (which doesn't seem to exist). Didn't know that you took over hostile ships... if I killed the home settlement would the colony flip too?

E: tfw game interrupts when you find a new jump point, but not on combat (RIP CL-Vanquisher)

In rough order:
-No worries about ship size (heh); I usually stick to <10k ton ships until TL4ish. Big ships are painfully inefficient at low tech.

-Well, roughly speaking, that is how shields work. It's just that they absorb all damage taken rather than having a damage model akin to the armor belt. For example, if a strength 10 shield is hit by a laser that does 15 damage, the shield takes 10 damage and pops (I can't remember if spare damage filters over in the current version, though I'm pretty sure it does). If a ship takes a hit from that same 15 damage laser, it will lose a single tile wide vertical column out of its armor belt. If it has 15 layers or more of armor, it won't take internal damage. If it has fewer, every point of damage left over after the armor penetration will be applied to internal modules.

In other words, if you fire two 12 damage lasers at a ship with 10 points of shield, the shield will absorb one of the hits, pop, and allow the other through. If a ship with a 10-layer armor belt takes the same two hits it will only take 4 points of internal damage unless by some coincidence the lasers both hit the same armor column. You can get a look at the armor belt of any of your ships in the Ships window by selecting one of them and clicking the Armor Status tab. The number of layers is the armor rating you set when designing the ship while the number of columns is dictated by the ship's tonnage.

Basically, because of this, normal shields are only useful as a buffer against weak strikes and to absorb some of the enemy's first attack, even if you've got decent tech. They don't start being a strong defense in their own right until you're nearing 100 points of shield; certain spoilers have several hundred points of fast-charging shields and can still be taken out by a handful of TL4ish ships if you know how to build them. There is also another type of shield, but I'll leave you to encounter that in your own time.

 ;)

-I take the redundancy point, just remember that the active sensor is almost always going to be one of the most expensive (and most costly to repair) parts of any ship. Once you start using ones good enough to see 1k ton FACs from hundreds of kilometers away they're also pretty darned big. But yeah, this is a great lesson in fiddling around with the settings on all of your modules. 100res isn't necessarily bad so long as you recognize the limitations. Do note, though, that you want a resolution-1 active sensor if you plan on using AMMs; otherwise you won't be able to target them for interception before they're close enough to hit within a 5-second tick.

-RE: Enemy surrender: If you have ground forces on a hostile world and have inflicted enough damage to them (one way or another; for enemies with large armies I tend to just launch orbital strikes on their ground forces and send in a few brigades to clean up) the world will eventually surrender, flipping to your control with lowered productivity, giving you their credits and installations, as well as some of their ships, information on tech they have but you don't, and occasionally starmap data.
Logged


Aurora on small monitors:
1. Game Parameters -> Reduced Height Windows.
2. Lock taskbar to the right side of your desktop.
3. Run Resize Enable

Metalax

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
    • Steam Profile
Re: Aurora - The Dwarf Fortress of 4X Games
« Reply #13734 on: July 30, 2013, 09:17:50 pm »

As flying dice has pointed out your ship lacks protection. My standard rule of thumb for non-beam slugging ships is 10% of tonnage into armour and 5% into shields, particularly with the upcoming shock damage rules in 6.3 giving more reason to have enough shielding to handle a few leaking asm's.

Your magazines are woefully insufficient. As an example, a typical early ship of mine of that size would carry around 100 size 6 ASM's or around 600 AMM's.

Your ship lacks a resolution 1 active sensor. This means that your AMM's are unlikely to ever get a chance to fire as incoming missiles will simply not be picked up by your res 100 sensor outside of touching range.

You may also want to consider designing a larger engine for the increased fuel efficiency to replace the many small engines you are using.

You really need to pick one role for the ship. At low tech and such tiny size, it is simply not possible to effectively pull off a multi role ship. There are essentially five combat roles at your tech level. Ships should focus on only one, possibly two as tech improves or size starts reaching a mid size at 60k+ tons.

Anti-Ship Missile ship
Anti-Missile Missile ship
Point Defence Beam ship
Beam Attack ship
Fleet Sensor ship

(Or are non-meson beam weapons useless firing from planets because of the atmosphere?  It's been a long time since I built any non-meson PDCs so I don't remember).
Non-meson beams are completely ineffective at firing from or at a colony if the atmospheric pressure is at least equal to Earth's. If the atmosphere is below that the weapons are degraded proportionally to the level of the atmosphere, rounding weapon damage down. This leads to Gauss cannons being totally ineffective if there is any atmosphere at all(but not CIWS, which ignore atmosphere entirely despite being based on gauss tech) but lasers can still be effective on planets with thin atmospheres.
Logged
In the beginning was the word, and the word was "Oops!"

gimlet

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Aurora - The Dwarf Fortress of 4X Games
« Reply #13735 on: July 31, 2013, 03:55:41 am »

Another point on the "active sensor" redundancy - your ship/base can use sensor info from the active sensors on *other* ships/bases, so as long as you have multiple sensor-containing ships/bases in the combat, that will provide the sensor redundancy for your fleet.  And if you have smaller/specialized "escort" ships, they don't *all* need the biggest sensors, that's a pretty big cost and tonnage savings.  Although I generally put at least a tiny sensor of the appropriate type on each ship so it's not completely helpless if it's alone for some reason...
Logged

Carnwennan

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Aurora - The Dwarf Fortress of 4X Games
« Reply #13736 on: July 31, 2013, 08:28:47 am »

Little question, since I couldn't find it when I searched the thread.... how do I repair armour?
Got a bit too close to Mars on a trip to blow up more of their PDCs and some awful martian anti-missile missiles managed to score a few hits.

Seriously, I told the task group to picket at 1000k km, 2k km inside that active sensor range, and they go straight for a bloody landing.


E: and literally as I post, I remember shipyard repairs. Brilliant.
Logged

Rolepgeek

  • Bay Watcher
  • They see me rollin' they savin'~
    • View Profile
Re: Aurora - The Dwarf Fortress of 4X Games
« Reply #13737 on: July 31, 2013, 10:25:42 am »

Actually, to point something out real fast, lasers don't take out full columns. If a strength 6 laser hits, it only penetrates four rows, but has an extra damage points on either side.
« Last Edit: July 31, 2013, 11:38:47 am by Rolepgeek »
Logged
Sincerely, Role P. Geek

Optimism is Painful.
Optimize anyway.

Carnwennan

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Aurora - The Dwarf Fortress of 4X Games
« Reply #13738 on: July 31, 2013, 11:37:38 am »

Better than the designs I had before? I still need to work on ECM, ECCM etc etc. Maybe add a laser ship to the group:
Spoiler: Light Missile Cruiser (click to show/hide)
Spoiler: Missile Defense (click to show/hide)
Spoiler: Sensor Ship (click to show/hide)
No shields either. The ones I have at the moment are bad, space wise. I have colliers and maintenance ships so maybe I will decrease the number of engineering space.
Gonna be a while until I can build any of it though, since I have only two or three shipyards.
Logged

gimlet

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Aurora - The Dwarf Fortress of 4X Games
« Reply #13739 on: July 31, 2013, 01:42:38 pm »

That's more like it, but still a couple of comments:

1) There's a gotcha in the listed detection range of a size 1 Active Sensor.  There's an easy confusion between "ship size" ("HS (Hull Size)": 1HS = 50tons) and "missile size" ("MSP(Missile Size Points)" - 1HS = 20MSP)- the listed range is for a "HS1", and because of the way sensors scale the actual detection range for a MSP1 thru MSP6 sized missile is about 1/10th the listed detection range.  I think the only place the actual ranges vs the various MSP sizes shows up is on the design screen for the sensor, so it's easy to miss.

1a) Partly because of that, the ranges of your Anti-Missiles is a bit high, you really don't have detection out to 18M km.  Also 18M is a bit high anyway, that's almost 1000 seconds of flight time - you could reallocate some of the space used for that to faster speed/more maneuverability/whatever, because generally you'll only want to fire anti-missiles at incoming missiles quite a lot closer than 18M km.  It's not a bad idea to have maybe SOME long ranged size 1 missiles, you can use them in volley with your anti-ship missiles to help overload enemy point defense, but for anti-missile work that's quite a lot more range than you really need.  Or fire some of the long range AMM 1-1 vs incoming missile volleys at longish range, whittling them down to allow less wasteful targeting by your shorter range anti-missiles.

2) IMHO Resolution 40 fire controls/sensors are a bad compromise unless you're actually facing HS40 ships (2000 tons), their actual ranges against the more formidable 5000+ ton ships will be MUCH less than the listed range, so you'll be wasting a lot of the potential range of your missiles.

3) On the cruiser, that still seems to be relatively few launchers for such an expensive ship, but if that's really all you can fit then that's that.  I'd try to see what could be done with maybe size 4 missiles, that's about 50% more launchers.  And maybe try increasing the reload time, see if the next step or 2 gives a better compromise between more launchers without making the time between volleys too long.  Again, even at 18M km that's about 1000 seconds of missile flight time, in general you fire a couple of volleys and wait to see the effects.  Again you might want to have SOME long range missiles, but imho most missiles will be fired at quite a bit less than 100M km...
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 914 915 [916] 917 918 ... 1347