Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Org]

He was prodded twice.

If I have to message him, or allow his allies to message him, telling him to get his night action in, it's a prod. I'm not even counting when I waited without PMing.

Ive been through my entire PM stuff. I have not deleted any, because I am not a douche bag like that. I saw one.

One.

The thing is, you can't count either of us, as I could have deleted it(which I didn't), or Pandar forgot that he only sent one(more likely).

[Org]

Teammate prods don't count.

Just because I don't post in the quicktopics all the time doesn't mean I don't read it.

And it still sucks. C rank.

Anyway, so Quarter 1 marks are just from the beginning of Q1, not earlier?

[dakarian]

We never did establish if teammate prods count or not.  I think that's where the issue lies for now.  I'll admit that I was only thinking of host based prods.  It's murkier since the reason why Pandar didn't personally prod is because he asked someone else to do so. 

I'm thinking of considering it a C- rank overall as a compromise.  If that won't do then we can have a vote and let the community decide how it should go.

The C rank, though, was earned full and true.  The replacement requests do get in the way of the game after a while.

Q1 is just for Q1.  Q0 was a beta quarter so everything from there is erased (I even erased it from my notes.  I wouldn't be able to put them back even if I wanted to).  Note that any game that ended after Jan 1 counts for Q1.  Note that Q0 is the only one to be effected this way.  Next quarter, the rank resets BUT this thread will still exist and your last quarter rank will be shown in the new thread. 


Still debating on the Quarter vs Semester system but I'm currently leaning on Quarters now.  Doesn't mean much since, as you may guess, I'm very wishy washy before I formally make a policy (you should see how the rules of my games develop )

[Leafsnail]

I woulda prodded Org but I was busy pretending to be SHADOWdump and GlyphGryph for most of that game .

[Org]

C- is fine.

[Pandarsenic]

C- is fine. That already bars him from most games.

[Squeegy]

Not what I thought it was.

[Org]

I can.

He repeatedly drove his scumteam insane by failing to send his Night Actions in, and I consider the extra time I gave him at his teammates' requests to be a prod.

Only once.
Repeatedly would mean I did it more than once.

N2 I missed it.

[CobaltKobold]

I vote vanilla C.

[Org]

Cobalt Kobold sent the team prod thing.

[Mr.Person]

NO matter what, we should still do a vote on this.

[CobaltKobold]

and what says Vector?

[dakarian]

A vote it is:  Please head to the QuickTopic provided to place your vote. 

Btw, Rank C- is technically a C.  It's a C with a note saying "there's been some issues but he is still a C rank".  I HIGHLY encourage no one make a game that allows a certain rank but NOT the Minus version of it. 

[Vector]

Cobalt Kobold sent the team prod thing.

I sent one, as well.  I think I might have even sent two, or at least I did a hell of a lot of raging in the scumchat.

However, I still want him to have a vanilla C.  If we change the policy to include teammate prods, it's unfair to change it before people have a chance to get wind of it and adjust their behaviors accordingly.

[dakarian]

That's why I'm thinking we need the vote.  Best to get the thing settled now.  Funny thing, it looks like it's a matter between C and C- .

sidenote: I don't think we should accept pure teammate prods, partially because the host may know more about the situation than the team.  The host asking the team publicly to prod would technically be the host prodding in a more complicated way though.