Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[JanusTwoface]

Mephansteras: If you had two apples and everyone was starving, who would you share your other apple with?

And what if you had three apples?

I already said you've been quieter that normal this round.  But what sort of question is this?  Are you really going to go with such an obvious question trying to find Mephansteras' scum team? 

Unless of course, you're both the scum here.  That way, when we lynch you (you know it's going to happen), then Meph will be safe.  Because who would ever be that obvious?

For that matter, why haven't you called out half of the town for being scum?  Isn't that your usual play style?  Being absolutely convinced that you know who the scum are to the point that you get them all lynched?

I'm doing one for everyone.  You just bumped yourself to first because of your response.

Aaaand you aren't bothering to follow up your accusation.  At all.  You're just leaving to bash someone else.  You created a weak analysis of a few people, posted a tiny little bit more in the hope that I would leave you alone and then went on to someone else.  This looks like classic "Hey, I'm helpful!" scum.

I'm not bothering to follow up which accusation?  I'm following up the four that I posted.  So sue me if there's not not much more to go on just yet.  My goal is to generate more context for later in the game.

[Leafsnail]

You aren't following it up though.  You're just defending yourself slightly from what I've posted, and are now posting a little more info on each accusation.  That's not what I meant, really, and the fact that you're doing all this just to defend yourself looks very odd.

[dorf]

Unvote.
Pandarsenic's quick ok-i-posted-so-don't-lynch-me-please reply and weak argument seem suspiciously scummy to me...

Tell us, where were you all this time? And why didn't you vote for your pal Zai for his (obviously) scummy way of conversing?

lulwut FailScum

1) No one was voting Pandar, so there couldn't be a "don't lynch me" reply from him, and there wasn't
2) There was no argument and it's pretty much still Random Voting Stage anyway; if anything you're misinterpreting his "reason for voting" Janus as an argument
3) People have lives. The game just started 3 hours ago, without much warning. People will be where they will be. You only get to say "where the hell were you" after a day has gone by.
4) I get to play however the fuck I want. I've been changing things up recently. And if the way I was talking is so scummy...why did you vote Pandar instead of me, FailScum? At least be consistent. If I'm so fucking obvious as scum, then why'd you vote for someone else, and with shittier logic?

inb4 "lol silly scum defending another person against obviously terrible arguments is so scummy. _{gee i hope no one notices I'M the real scum lol}"

It looks to me like you're overcompensating as newbie scum to me, dorf.

[PPE:] Ninja'd somewhat

Heh, I predicted this.
What I did was still RVS. I voted Pandarsenic for, obviously, bullshit reasons, hoping that someone (you) would then try a little too hard in finding valid arguments where there aren't any.
And you did just that.

Unvote
You just went up on my list, Zai.

[webadict]

Mephansteras: If you had two apples and everyone was starving, who would you share your other apple with?

And what if you had three apples?

They're apples, I'd split them up so everyone got an equal share of apple.

Incorrect sir. You avoided a meaningless question by using an unoriginal answer. For that, I shall say that the scum team is...

Zai and Mephansteras.

[Pandarsenic]

I'm thinking Zai and Janus maybe.

Zai's attempt to buddy me is a little weird; he went to unusual lengths to defend me. Janus... Janus eats gunpowder and shits scum, basically. I shouldn't even have to explain it.

[Pandarsenic]

Also, I'm sleeping now so anyone wants to whine about my lack of posting in this game or any other can go screw a goat, I'm too tired to post elsewhere.

[Leafsnail]

I'm thinking Zai and Janus maybe.

Zai's attempt to buddy me is a little weird; he went to unusual lengths to defend me. Janus... Janus eats gunpowder and shits scum, basically. I shouldn't even have to explain it.

Interesting buddying, Pandarsenic.  Jumping on people without applying pressure is very unlike you.

[Pandarsenic]

There's no buddying in my post. Try again.

Zai, I'm still uncertain about; I'm leaving him to Webadict, assuming Webby himself isn't scum.

Janus, though? Definitely mafia.

[Mephansteras]

Still waiting to hear from Eduren, so my vote will stay there for now.

Web is doing his normal grab-and-smash approach to scum hunting. Nothing new there.

Any particular reason you're voting for Zai, web?

[webadict]

Still waiting to hear from Eduren, so my vote will stay there for now.

Web is doing his normal grab-and-smash approach to scum hunting. Nothing new there.

Any particular reason you're voting for Zai, web?

^THIS IS SCUMMY!

[Mephansteras]

How so?

My vote on Eduren is a basic RV stage vote, and will stay on him until he speaks or I get a clear enough read on someone to decide that they are actually scum.

You are doing your normal thing. Deciding that I'm scum based on my answer to a random pointless question is a basic tactic of yours. But I'm not scum this game, so you're really not going to get anything out of me with it.

And I do want to know your reasons for voting Zai. You rarely give reasons, but those you do give tend to be good.

[Pandarsenic]

Mephansteras, that really smells scummy to me.

As usual, it's all my wintuition I'm going on, but it does. Not as sure of you as I am of Janus though.

[Leafsnail]

Now, irrelevant questions is a scumtell for Meph, seen most clearly in Bay 12 Mafia.

However, Pandarsenic, I'm seeing something very strange in your posts.  It's something about the way you keep attacking people without pressuring them, almost as if you're trying to get them lynched rather than trying to determine if they are scum.

[JanusTwoface]

You aren't following it up though.  You're just defending yourself slightly from what I've posted, and are now posting a little more info on each accusation.  That's not what I meant, really, and the fact that you're doing all this just to defend yourself looks very odd.

Dude... Since there are no roles (excepting the doctor), I can't use my usual logic-like game so I'm forced to be more aggressive than usual.

That being said, I think you're trying a little to hard to damn me.  I'm not trying to defend myself, I'm trying to get other players to post so that we can read them.  I've definitely gotten responses out of you (Leafsnail) and Pandarsenic, so that's good.

Eduren, now's about when we start wondering if you've forgotten about this game...

Psuedo-edit:

However, Pandarsenic, I'm seeing something very strange in your posts.  It's something about the way you keep attacking people without pressuring them, almost as if you're trying to get them lynched rather than trying to determine if they are scum.

That too.

[Zai]

Heh, I predicted this.
What I did was still RVS. I voted Pandarsenic for, obviously, bullshit reasons, hoping that someone (you) would then try a little too hard in finding valid arguments where there aren't any.
And you did just that.

Unvote
You just went up on my list, Zai.

Heh, I predicted this.

inb4 "lol silly scum defending another person against obviously terrible arguments is so scummy. _{gee i hope no one notices I'M the real scum lol}"

Zai's attempt to buddy me is a little weird; he went to unusual lengths to defend me.

It's not buddying. It's pointing out fallacies in people's reasons for voting; it doesn't matter who they're voting for. You people need to get over that; I used this idiotic idea of yours to get me lynched in BYORP (now uPP), but it's nonetheless idiotic. It's just pointing out flaws in people's thinking. If someone's being stupid, I point out their stupidity.