Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Leafsnail]

Dost thou admidst to being the partner of Scum? The only way Scum could THINK you were fellow scum is if you WERE fellow scum.

Damn!  You got me!  Well, looks like the game's over now.

On a more serious note, I said nothing of the sort.

Hmm, perhaps I could try adopting some way of speaking... nah.

[dirtybirdy]

Didn't see your post. I suppose lurkers have their reasons for lurking though it's not my style of play. Nonetheless, you seem almost angry Zai for no apparent reason...that to me is scummy. 

[Zai]

Didn't see your post. I suppose lurkers have their reasons for lurking though it's not my style of play. Nonetheless, you seem almost angry Zai for no apparent reason...that to me is scummy. 

How dost I appear angry? Explaineth, Scum! Only serious scumhunters needeth apply! I am serious, not angered! Only scum findeth anger in those who attacketh them via random vote! Why dost thou do so, Scum? This game is not for the weak-willed, Brown Bellied Scum! Quit now if thou think 'tis too much for thee!

[Pandarsenic]

JanusTwoFace is two-faced scum.

[Zai]

JanusTwoFace is two-faced scum.

How original of thou!

[Pandarsenic]

Just because that joke gets made all the time doesn't mean he isn't Mafia. Which he is, by the way.

[dorf]

Unvote.
Pandarsenic's quick ok-i-posted-so-don't-lynch-me-please reply and weak argument seem suspiciously scummy to me...

Tell us, where were you all this time? And why didn't you vote for your pal Zai for his (obviously) scummy way of conversing?

[Pandarsenic]

ok-i-posted posts only happen when I'm threatened, which I wasn't.
It's not a weak argument, it's no argument, it's just a statement of fact.
I was playing Monster Hunter.

Fuck Plesioth. Seriously, fuck him, fuck Plesioth and his screwed up hitboxes.

And I don't attack over simple poststyles, though they might be obfuscations. I attack scuminess. Which Janus has in spades.

[Zai]

Unvote.
Pandarsenic's quick ok-i-posted-so-don't-lynch-me-please reply and weak argument seem suspiciously scummy to me...

Tell us, where were you all this time? And why didn't you vote for your pal Zai for his (obviously) scummy way of conversing?

lulwut FailScum

1) No one was voting Pandar, so there couldn't be a "don't lynch me" reply from him, and there wasn't
2) There was no argument and it's pretty much still Random Voting Stage anyway; if anything you're misinterpreting his "reason for voting" Janus as an argument
3) People have lives. The game just started 3 hours ago, without much warning. People will be where they will be. You only get to say "where the hell were you" after a day has gone by.
4) I get to play however the fuck I want. I've been changing things up recently. And if the way I was talking is so scummy...why did you vote Pandar instead of me, FailScum? At least be consistent. If I'm so fucking obvious as scum, then why'd you vote for someone else, and with shittier logic?

inb4 "lol silly scum defending another person against obviously terrible arguments is so scummy. _{gee i hope no one notices I'M the real scum lol}"

It looks to me like you're overcompensating as newbie scum to me, dorf.

[PPE:] Ninja'd somewhat

[JanusTwoface]

JanusTwoFace is two-faced scum.

Nope.  Not scum.  No matter the number of faces.

Zai, why don't you come join in the fun.  Your name appears to be the most abbreviated in the OP.  Does that mean that dakarian was paying more attention to it when sending you the Mafia role PM perhaps?

This dost not makest sense, fair square. As we all know, Dak splittests up the roles fairly by doing it most randomly. But evenest if Dak didst not, I think he wouldst pay most attention to you and Meph.

Hmm...  You're probably right.  unvote

So far as suspicions go:
- Eduren has not posted yet (I know it's only the first few hours). 
- webadict isn't posting overmuch.  How do you like them apples?
- dorf for odd reasoning against Pandarsenic.
- Leafsnail for only FoSing then not posting much more.

[Leafsnail]

- Eduren has not posted yet (I know it's only the first few hours).
- webadict isn't posting overmuch.  How do you like them apples?
- dorf for odd reasoning against Pandarsenic.
- Leafsnail for only FoSing then not posting much more.

JanusTwoface, I find this list very interesting.  It definately looks like you're making a scumhunting effort, yet you aren't really putting any pressure on anyone with it due to the fact that you've made four weak accusations at once.

[JanusTwoface]

Four weak accusations?  What would you have me going off of then?  I'm putting out everything that I've seen that's even somewhat suspicious.

So Leafsnail, why do I get the feeling that you are mafia again as in NSBM2?

Perhaps it's because you're a paranoid MAFIA MEMBER!?  In all seriousness, I'm more of an anti-Pandarsenic in terms of alignment.  I've flipped mafia twice in total.

Eduren, you haven't come down here yet.  What do you think about my placing an FoS rather than a vote on you?

What about this then?  The first half looks like a classic case of trying to use Gambler's Fallacy to protect yourself.  You've only flipped scum twice, so why should this game be any different?

And if you're so anti-Pandarsenic as you claim, why are you not even coming close to thinking about putting pressure on him?

Hmmm scum?  How about it?

[Leafsnail]

What about this then?  The first half looks like a classic case of trying to use Gambler's Fallacy to protect yourself.  You've only flipped scum twice, so why should this game be any different?

It's not a defence.  Just an observation.

And if you're so anti-Pandarsenic as you claim, why are you not even coming close to thinking about putting pressure on him?

For Pandarsenic, we say "Scum is always scum".  I'm sortof like the opposite.  That's what I meant by "anti-Pandarsenic" rather than "I HAVE A PERSONAL GRUDGE AGAINST PANDAR AND WILL RANDOMLY TRY TO GET HIM LYNCHED".

Now, I find your reply interesting for a couple of reasons.  Firstly, it's an overreaction to a single vote on you.  Secondly, you only launched a proper attack when I pointed out how weak your original ones were, and even then, only on me, and on a post I made before your first post.

[JanusTwoface]

I'm doing one for everyone.  You just bumped yourself to first because of your response.

Unvote.
Pandarsenic's quick ok-i-posted-so-don't-lynch-me-please reply and weak argument seem suspiciously scummy to me...

Tell us, where were you all this time? And why didn't you vote for your pal Zai for his (obviously) scummy way of conversing?

Hmm.  This seems like you're trying a little hard.  Granted, Pandarsenic didn't post anything of depth, but it is/was random-vote-stage.  Perfectly normal thing to do.  And *all this time*?  Really?  He posted 3 (RL) hours after the game started.  Out of 48 hours.  Oh no, what is this craziness!

And then nothing else?  Hmm.  I see, hoping that you could get a quick vote off and then lie low?  Hmm, shiny.  Or scummy.  As it were.

[Leafsnail]

I'm doing one for everyone.  You just bumped yourself to first because of your response.

Aaaand you aren't bothering to follow up your accusation.  At all.  You're just leaving to bash someone else.  You created a weak analysis of a few people, posted a tiny little bit more in the hope that I would leave you alone and then went on to someone else.  This looks like classic "Hey, I'm helpful!" scum.