Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 15

Author Topic: /v/'s potentially fail, fortress succession thread!  (Read 37137 times)

Haar

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: /v/'s potentially fail, fortress succession thread!
« Reply #15 on: December 16, 2009, 09:58:28 am »
Quote from: As Always on December 16, 2009, 09:53:41 am
Eeh, I'm not a fan of that one. Why not just let our personalities be the personalities, however we decide to run it, instead of taking on bullshit /v/ personas?

Because I wanted an excuse to be listening to IOSYS/Hatsune Miku's songs.
Oh well.
Anyway, ok, I'm fine with everything.
Logged

Hexon

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: /v/'s potentially fail, fortress succession thread!
« Reply #16 on: December 16, 2009, 09:59:37 am »
Quote from: As Always on December 16, 2009, 09:53:41 am
Quote from: Haar on December 16, 2009, 09:48:18 am

Also, we need characters. Personalities that will oversee the fortress by their standarts. Like... uh... a Weeaboo will transform most of the Hunters into Fishers and arm the army with Iron swords because GLORIOUS NIPPON. A Furry will encage a lot of animals and will make a giant zoo, or will make them all "Avaliable" from the stocks menu and will avoid butchering them.


Eeh, I'm not a fan of that one. Why not just let our personalities be the personalities, however we decide to run it, instead of taking on bullshit /v/ personas?

Yeah there are so many persona's it would get a bit ridiculous. I can already envision a Dwarf with a ridiculous amount of 'Legendary' skills and perfectly everything stats being named 'Mary Sue'.
Logged

Slashcko

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: /v/'s potentially fail, fortress succession thread!
« Reply #17 on: December 16, 2009, 10:18:35 am »
BROFIST

Sign me up.
Logged

Dirkiee

  • Escaped Lunatic
    • View Profile
Re: /v/'s potentially fail, fortress succession thread!
« Reply #18 on: December 16, 2009, 10:33:19 am »
Can I join this party?
Logged

As Always

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: /v/'s potentially fail, fortress succession thread!
« Reply #19 on: December 16, 2009, 10:45:57 am »
Alright, so, I've been given rights to post the official 'rules' list for this succession game. Here goes what we have decided on.

First rule is, you do not talk

>1 year in game per turn, with 4 days from the start of the turn to post an update.

>Name one dwarf after yourself of any profession / status, cannot rename other already taken dwarves. You cannot name yourself after the fuckwin nobles such as Dungeon master.

> Post pics along with update, and the more fleshed out the story is the better. Ensure to post updates on named dwarves if they have accomplished anything of note.

Pretty standard fare all up for anyone who's read or played a succession game before, no real restrictions on what you can and can't do in game. Attempt to finished any small projects of the previous leaders, just as common courtesy.
« Last Edit: December 16, 2009, 10:47:43 am by As Always »
Logged
"...Although, how you misplace an entire corpse is beyond me."

Eruonen

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: /v/'s potentially fail, fortress succession thread!
« Reply #20 on: December 16, 2009, 10:55:45 am »
Sign me up.
Also it might be a good idea to put a link in the OP to the IRC channel. It might be nice to have people update us in real-time too.
Logged

Skeleton

  • Escaped Lunatic
    • View Profile
Re: /v/'s potentially fail, fortress succession thread!
« Reply #21 on: December 16, 2009, 11:09:29 am »
Sign me up :3
Logged

Arramiy

  • Bay Watcher
  • Failsafes on failsafe's failsafes!
    • View Profile
Re: /v/'s potentially fail, fortress succession thread!
« Reply #22 on: December 16, 2009, 11:11:51 am »
Count me in, just putting that in here.
Logged
Nothing yet!

Eruonen

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: /v/'s potentially fail, fortress succession thread!
« Reply #23 on: December 16, 2009, 02:07:08 pm »
Spoilers: @Skeleton's name is Skeleton. The @ is just because he has OP status in the IRC channel, just like I had a ~ to indicate that I was the channel owner :3c
Logged

Comrade Ankh

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: /v/'s potentially fail, fortress succession thread!
« Reply #24 on: December 16, 2009, 06:58:03 pm »
I'm in, broskis.
Logged

vasily

  • Escaped Lunatic
    • View Profile
Re: /v/'s potentially fail, fortress succession thread!
« Reply #25 on: December 16, 2009, 07:13:10 pm »
IF U BROS WERE KILLED TOMORROW, I WOULDNT GO 2 UR FUNERALS CUZ ID B N JAIL 4 KILLIN DA MOTHRFUKA THAT KILLED U!
......__________________
...../_==o;;;;;;;;______[]
.....), ---.(_(__) /
....// (..) ), ----"
...//___//
..//___//
WE TRUE HOMIES
WE RIDE TOGETHER
WE DIE TOGETHER


Sign me up.

edit: I'll be gone for a week starting tomorrow so my turn would have to be after that.
« Last Edit: December 16, 2009, 07:22:41 pm by vasily »
Logged

FuzzyFelt

  • Escaped Lunatic
    • View Profile
Re: /v/'s potentially fail, fortress succession thread!
« Reply #26 on: December 16, 2009, 07:17:43 pm »
cant play due to work, though will follow this succession like hell.
Logged

vasily

  • Escaped Lunatic
    • View Profile
Re: /v/'s potentially fail, fortress succession thread!
« Reply #27 on: December 16, 2009, 07:34:09 pm »
Can we get some info on the starting locale? Flux? Magma? Rivers? Aquifer? Etc.

I've heard it's on an island with no trees. That's all anyone knows.
Logged

Slashcko

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: /v/'s potentially fail, fortress succession thread!
« Reply #28 on: December 16, 2009, 07:35:18 pm »
I can go at any time in January by the way so just put me whereever.
Logged

Akigagak

  • Bay Watcher
  • Omnipimping
    • View Profile
Re: /v/'s potentially fail, fortress succession thread!
« Reply #29 on: December 16, 2009, 08:00:15 pm »
Oh god, 4chan invades.

This should be fun.
Logged
Quote from: Vector on March 29, 2011, 12:38:13 pm
But then, life was also easier when I was running around here pretending to be a man, so I guess I should just "man up" and get back to work.
Quote from: Duke 2.0 on July 15, 2011, 03:37:11 pm
This is mz poetrz, it is mz puyyle.
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 15
« previous next »