Question: What, in particular, do you consider unique about this piece? Is it the incomprehensibility and enormously run-on sentences? Look no farther than James Joyce and Faulkner. Perhaps it is the diction and imagery, which is common to 13-year-old girls everywhere (take a gander at Fanfiction.net and tell me they don't use similar word choice).
Maybe it's the lack of planning for your poem. Maybe it's the lack of decipherable meaning. Maybe it's your odd obsession with ellipses, or with your own uniqueness, or with the concept of Pain.
All those subjects have been covered in depth before, by both better and worse men by you.
Neither incomprehensibility nor punctuation abuses can make you great. Your pedestrian imagery and poor diction--as well as the distinct lack of any sort of rhyme, meter, or flow--are unattractive. Further, your translations of each phrase do not mean that the poem has meaning. Perhaps each word attaches to a certain concept, but the whole appears both meaningless and unreadable.
That said, people write for a reason. If writing makes you feel better about life, then write away. Everything you write thus will be good, since it has meaning to humanity (i.e. you). It does not, however, mean that it is good in a broader sense. Your piece is not well-written. I would likely have been ashamed to turn it in in elementary school--though believe me, I have written my share of horrors. I, however, tend to keep them in my notebook where they belong.
I am sorry if you feel that I have been needlessly harsh, but your opening post (and subsequent statements) seemed to request opinions on the uniqueness of your piece. Please keep on writing; far be it for me to dissuade you. You are likely quite capable of creating unusual and unique work. That said, this poem is neither. I hope to make a statement to the contrary in the future.