Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 9

Author Topic: Army size and errata  (Read 6778 times)

Nadaka

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
    • http://www.nadaka.us
Re: Army size and errata
« Reply #60 on: December 01, 2009, 06:33:18 pm »

Well then the Civil war doesn't count either.

Since a Civil war cannot really be official
*shrugs* That is sort of different I suppose since we wern't fighting a foriegn nation, plus wasn't the civil war before we had an actual Congress?

The Confederacy was a different nation. The confederate states executed their legal right to cede, and for legitimate reasons. But they were stills still "America". The union did officially declare war.
Logged
Take me out to the black, tell them I ain't comin' back...
I don't care cause I'm still free, you can't take the sky from me...

I turned myself into a monster, to fight against the monsters of the world.

Neonivek

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Army size and errata
« Reply #61 on: December 01, 2009, 07:11:15 pm »

Wait wait wait... but that would make the North the villains of the Civil war officially. (though I wonder if it means it wasn't a civil war)
« Last Edit: December 01, 2009, 07:12:59 pm by Neonivek »
Logged

Realmfighter

  • Bay Watcher
  • Yeaah?
    • View Profile
Re: Army size and errata
« Reply #62 on: December 01, 2009, 07:17:50 pm »

Wait wait wait... but that would make the North the villains of the Civil war officially. (though I wonder if it means it wasn't a civil war)

What do you mean, Villains?
Logged
We may not be as brave as Gryffindor, as willing to get our hands dirty as Hufflepuff, or as devious as Slytherin, but there is nothing, nothing more dangerous than a little too much knowledge and a conscience that is open to debate

Akigagak

  • Bay Watcher
  • Omnipimping
    • View Profile
Re: Army size and errata
« Reply #63 on: December 01, 2009, 07:20:26 pm »

They started it.
Logged
But then, life was also easier when I was running around here pretending to be a man, so I guess I should just "man up" and get back to work.
This is mz poetrz, it is mz puyyle.

Aqizzar

  • Bay Watcher
  • There is no 'U'.
    • View Profile
Re: Army size and errata
« Reply #64 on: December 01, 2009, 07:21:24 pm »

No.  The civil war was a long time after we had a congress.
Hmm well I can't remember if Congress had the power to declare war from the beginning or if it was gained at a later date anyway.

What you're think of is the repeal of the Gulf of Tonkin declaration.  By 1971 Congress (or at least congressional pollsters) were pretty sure that Lyndon Johnson had escalated our presence in Vietnam without any real justification or notice.  A little later they passed the War Powers Resolution, which requires the President to tell Congress if he's deployed any troops somewhere, and without their explicit voting approval troops can't stay deployed for more than three months.

Now, what would happen if a President just kept rotating deployments every couple months, or just didn't tell anyone about a deployment until CNN breaks it?  Essentially, the one and only thing that Congress could ever do to a President, hold an impeachment.  And thanks to Gingrich dropping the nuclear bomb on Clinton, the justification for impeachment has effectively been narrowed to "marital infidelity and absolutely nothing else".  Sleep tight.
Logged
And here is where my beef pops up like a looming awkward boner.
Please amplify your relaxed states.
Quote from: PTTG??
The ancients built these quote pyramids to forever store vast quantities of rage.

Neonivek

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Army size and errata
« Reply #65 on: December 01, 2009, 07:24:26 pm »

I think we all know that it is impossibe to Impeach a president at this point.

Though there is quite a few Government activities that REALLY say that the USA really needs to work on their government... That and people need to seriously work on their collective responsibility and ability to analyse propaganda.
« Last Edit: December 01, 2009, 07:26:29 pm by Neonivek »
Logged

Realmfighter

  • Bay Watcher
  • Yeaah?
    • View Profile
Re: Army size and errata
« Reply #66 on: December 01, 2009, 07:25:20 pm »

They started it.
So, if a country sponsors terrorists who attack Canada yelling " Country is awesome!" and we retaliated, we would be the villains?

There is NEVER anything that black and white.
Logged
We may not be as brave as Gryffindor, as willing to get our hands dirty as Hufflepuff, or as devious as Slytherin, but there is nothing, nothing more dangerous than a little too much knowledge and a conscience that is open to debate

Jude

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Army size and errata
« Reply #67 on: December 01, 2009, 07:26:34 pm »

Iran has 12 million soldiers? Lmao. That's like 1/3 or 1/4 of their population.

Which would make sense if they count all men between 18 and 60 as being in the army, which wouldn't surprise me.
Logged
Quote from: Raphite1
I once started with a dwarf that was "belarded by great hanging sacks of fat."

Oh Jesus

Neonivek

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Army size and errata
« Reply #68 on: December 01, 2009, 07:27:34 pm »

Uhhh RealmFighter

That country that sponsored Terrorists who attack Canada... WAS the United States.
Logged

Cthulhu

  • Bay Watcher
  • A squid
    • View Profile
Re: Army size and errata
« Reply #69 on: December 01, 2009, 07:28:29 pm »

Well then the Civil war doesn't count either.

Since a Civil war cannot really be official
*shrugs* That is sort of different I suppose since we wern't fighting a foriegn nation, plus wasn't the civil war before we had an actual Congress?

The Confederacy was a different nation. The confederate states executed their legal right to cede, and for legitimate reasons. But they were stills still "America". The union did officially declare war.

The legal right thing is the problem, because as I remember there was no explicit allowance for secession in the Constitution.  Therefore they did not have a legal right to secede, they were still America, and since the Confederacy was the original aggressor, the South would be the villains.

That term is irrelevant though, because there's no good and bad, just us and them.
Logged
Shoes...

Aqizzar

  • Bay Watcher
  • There is no 'U'.
    • View Profile
Re: Army size and errata
« Reply #70 on: December 01, 2009, 07:28:41 pm »

They started it.
So, if a country sponsors terrorists who attack Canada yelling " Country is awesome!" and we retaliated, we would be the villains?

There is NEVER anything that black and white.

I'm pretty sure he was joking around.  He's also completely and utterly of course, which he probably knows.


Iran has 12 million soldiers? Lmao. That's like 1/3 or 1/4 of their population.

Which would make sense if they count all men between 18 and 60 as being in the army, which wouldn't surprise me.

Yeah, that's the impression that I got.  Of course, Iran was another of those countries that combined Middle-Eastern nationalism with a love of bureaucratic employment.  That's still a wild overstatement though.
Logged
And here is where my beef pops up like a looming awkward boner.
Please amplify your relaxed states.
Quote from: PTTG??
The ancients built these quote pyramids to forever store vast quantities of rage.

Realmfighter

  • Bay Watcher
  • Yeaah?
    • View Profile
Re: Army size and errata
« Reply #71 on: December 01, 2009, 07:33:53 pm »

Quote
I'm pretty sure he was joking around.  He's also completely and utterly of course, which he probably knows.

What?
Logged
We may not be as brave as Gryffindor, as willing to get our hands dirty as Hufflepuff, or as devious as Slytherin, but there is nothing, nothing more dangerous than a little too much knowledge and a conscience that is open to debate

Nadaka

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
    • http://www.nadaka.us
Re: Army size and errata
« Reply #72 on: December 01, 2009, 07:34:29 pm »

Wait wait wait... but that would make the North the villains of the Civil war officially. (though I wonder if it means it wasn't a civil war)

Its complex, more complex than you get high school history. Its pretty safe to say, neither side was innocent, but it was the southerners (both black and white) that were hit the hardest.
Logged
Take me out to the black, tell them I ain't comin' back...
I don't care cause I'm still free, you can't take the sky from me...

I turned myself into a monster, to fight against the monsters of the world.

Aqizzar

  • Bay Watcher
  • There is no 'U'.
    • View Profile
Re: Army size and errata
« Reply #73 on: December 01, 2009, 07:38:01 pm »

Quote
I'm pretty sure he was joking around.  He's also completely and utterly wrong of course, which he probably knows.

Oops.

The legal right thing is the problem, because as I remember there was no explicit allowance for secession in the Constitution.  Therefore they did not have a legal right to secede, they were still America, and since the Confederacy was the original aggressor, the South would be the villains.

That term is irrelevant though, because there's no good and bad, just us and them.

It's true that there was no clause allowing for secession in the Constitution, or by the Air Bud rule, also no clause against it.  Like most matters of statecraft, what ultimately proved to be "right" and "wrong" was more a matter of what one side could make stick over the other than any specific legal definition.
Logged
And here is where my beef pops up like a looming awkward boner.
Please amplify your relaxed states.
Quote from: PTTG??
The ancients built these quote pyramids to forever store vast quantities of rage.

Neonivek

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Army size and errata
« Reply #74 on: December 01, 2009, 07:38:55 pm »

For the most part in terms of who was more guilty I'd personally would think it was the North.

This is of course if you accept the not as accepted belief that the North's stance on Slavery was an end war justification and even if you took it into account the effect on slavery was almost non-existant after the war anyhow.

Though Id have to research it a bit more. It is hard to get into because the USA is INLOVE with revisionist history. I know all countries are to a certain extent though. The USA's attempts are just a bit more transparent and have a paper trail. It takes quite a bit of research to get accurate history.

Mind you I realise that all history is, is an interpretation... but still

Ps. I have an eternal loathing for altered history!
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 9