Leafsnail, you have no idea how badly I want to say "And then a jump to the right." ...but lets save the TimeWarp for another time. (Actually I think we got those reversed, but whatevs)
Anyway, I am caught up on the discussion finally.
Great Wall of Text
I propose that no one is allowed to quote this post without paraphrasing. Ever.
Taking the post as a whole, we see that you are supporting your arguments with logical analysis. This is good; people trying to parse, who have semi-hard evidence that they are actively pursuing scum get a few points to their Trustability score. As such, I am tentatively disuaded from voting to kill you on the first day, and would disuade others from the same.
I would say the same for ToonyMan. After his claim, he has let the scum know that he gains powers as people die. Even though this will suck for the town, he can now be tested to verify this (we can see if he inherits a role of whoever dies next) and will in all likelyhood be killed by scum tonight. If he isn't killed, then chances are that his role is actually a scum role. In either case, a lynch on him is a waste, and should be spent on scumhunting those who we can't test yet.
As an aside, (and call it buddying, or whatever you want, but) Toony seems legitimate to me. One night will be able to prove this.
To investigators (if we have any that can glean good information), I would advise you to take heed of suspicious and vocal folk. If you find a scum, it can be hard to incriminate a lurker just on that basis, without revealing your hand. (in this context, I do not propose that this precludes me, in case any of you are going to try and twist this. <_<)
I think
CobaltKobold has been a bit on the scummish side with paper-thin logic supporting direct attacks. I still don't have enough knowledge about the scenario to feel comfortable making a serious lynch vote, though. I'll try to get a better read when I have the time later today.
EDIT: (before y'all freak out, it was a formating edit: I botched a quote)