Solifuge, your scheme is, frankly, horrible, if I read how you're saying it works correctly. If you think that Exkirby is scum, then you can't actually lynch him now that you're sibs, because you'd die too, 1:1, and the nightkill would give them the equality needed to win.
Voting and exploding both of you would be fine (if one scum/one town), because it'd be like lynching a Hated mafioso- you get a lack of night.
CobaltKobold, did you intend to FoS me there? I find this very interesting. Especially because you just advocated lynching me to kill ExKirby as well. You assumed that my ability would take both of us down, saying that this was "A good idea if one was town, and one was scum".
Its strange also that you just assumed ExKirby is scum based on my suspicions, without even questioning it... it's almost as though you hoped that we were siblings, and that you could seal a victory by killing 2 townies in one lynch.
CobaltKobold I am calling you out.
You misread me. I said lynching the sibs are a bad idea, because dropping town and mafia both one and shifting to night phase is equivalent to nolynching in (non-3p) lylo, handing the mafia the win. (Similarly bad is the case whereby you're both town.) I'd only want to lynch a mafia-sib if it were 3p lylo, because any earlier lylo wins for mafia. And, if you control your sibbing, then it's unlikely you'll pick your scumbuddy, unless that's part of the ability.
What I said was that, if at least one of you is scum (my hypothesis being on YOU, not Exkirby, hence why the FoS is on
you) and the "blows up when voted" thing is on,
and you're still sibbed...then, unless I thought both of you were town (I don't) I'd go with it, because it'd be like a correct lylo lynch followed by NK, since it would be dayphase with each side down one.
CONCLUSION: Stop putting words in my mouth, scum.
Finally
it's LYLO.
You don't vote unless you're damn sure you're voting scum or b. you ARE scum- because if you vote nonscum, the scum can quickhammer FTW Oh, right, deadlines.