I don't understand the stigma about organ donation after death.
I, myself, wish to be buried whole. Not taken apart like some child picking at the inside of a chicken strip and leaving the batter.
That analogy doesn't make any sense at all.
A child only eating part of his food is being picky and wasteful, hence immature and self-centered.
Giving your organs - which you don't actually need anymore, being dead and all - to people who actually need them is the exact opposite of wasteful and self-centered. It
saves people's lives.
If I have something that I'm never going to use again, and that is just going to sit in a box underground and rot, never to be seen again by anyone, and I can save someone's life by saying that they can have it, the choice is pretty obvious to me. Sure, funerary arrangements of many varieties (whether it's cremation or being buried whole or something else) have a lot of sentimental and cultural value, but what's more important here?
If you want me to say what's similar to a kid picking at chicken and wasting the parts he doesn't like, it's getting embalmed, really. Your body is still messed with in a number of fashions, all for the purpose of making it look presentable and rot less quickly. You still get stuff removed/messed with, and all kinds of things shoved inside the body, all just to sit in the same box later.
Sure, getting buried whole without any real preparation avoids those things, but I still think it's rather selfish, given that your lifeless corpse is just going into a box anyway and has the potential to
save several human lives otherwise.