Would you sell a kidney if you were perfectly healthy? Or more importantly, do you think it's fine for other people to sell their kidneys?
Before you go on a tirade, hear me out. I'm not actually taking a stance here. I'm far more curious in knowing the competent opinions of some of the forumites. For example, in Australia there are only 9.3 organ donors per 1 million people. That seriously sucks if you really need that kidney in Australia. What people end up doing is going overseas and buying kidneys on the black market for unsafe operations in places like Pakistan, paying around $30 000 for a kidney. There are no controls there, no one knows where the organs came from, and whether you would even survive with the organ.
I'm not a doctor. Not even close. I have no clue how important a kidney is other than you have two and people can survive with just one. If the government could set up a program to allow people to sell one of their kidneys for $50 000, do you think it would be a good thing? Of course, for this argument, we assume that the government is perfect in every way. Sounds retarded, but it would be futile arguing about how the government would screw up somehow. So let's focus on the moral and ethical choice of selling a kidney and not the capability of government.
In short: which is more important? The problems that come from being able to sell bits of yourself or the potential amount of lives that could be saved?