I don't think it's possible to have modified cops in a game with a miller.
where did you get that from? Everything is possible. It's up to the mod.
I personally think Censorship should come first, as the scum won't gain anything from Conservatizing it.
huh?
Jesters are NOT something to watch out for. If someone is scummy, we lynch him. No WIFOM. Any mod that adds jester to a game is making a mistake.
So instead of a person you see is actually 'scummy' you keep your vote on your random pick.
Yes. I suspect some things in some people but don't want to blow it before I can come up with a nice conclusion and launch a full blown attack. I maintain my votes longer than you because that's how pressure and the possibility of bandwaggons is created.
So you had a good reason on Org when you placed a vote on him? If not then you very much DID put a vote down with no reason behind it. Be more consistent please.
Dude. It's first post. It's RVS. The things is... I try not to mention it's RVS so maybe I migtht get some kind of reaction.
But we shouldn't be talking about how we vote. We should be talking about why you paniced once a vote fell on you.
I don't panic. I get pissed about the fact someone dares to say Im not posting content, specially when I say I'll post more later. Adding to that, the fact that there's completely MIA people that you prefer to ignore.
Yes, I'm saying ExKirby is handling himself better than you are.
And I'm saying that you have yet to show me your "scumhunting" style of votehopping and thinking that people who defend themselves are scummy works.
Seriously, I've seen people lynched for far less panic and hysteria than you are giving.
Where? Here in b12 where people vote for a day shortening when some players haven't yet spoken?
Stop saying it was panic or hysteria. It was justified anger at a bullshit move on your part (followed by Pandarsenic). I specifically said I would post later and you IGNORED me and voted. Are PAndarsenics caps panicky and hysterical? why? why not?
It is scummy. You panic like the whole world will lose if you die, rather than like a townie that realizes it just sucks a little.
From what I recall, my dying seems to hurt town a great deal. In my opinion, the world WILL lose if I die for no reason whatsoever. It's not like I have made a good enough contribution to win the game so I can peacefully die. I'm not a townie that sucks a little. You are.
How about 'I'm town and trying to read you since it's DAY 1 and you're the first person to do something worthy of a spotlight'?
IF I voted you for something completely false to make you be in the spotlight... How would you consider that? Your vote didn't convey random in any way.
I thought capitals didn't help the matter?`
This is different. It's an attention grabber. They're not meant to emphasize the scummyness like in "VERY scummy" but just make you unable to easyly ignore them.
All in all. You're wrong in several accounts.
I was pissed.
Why? Because your "so called random vote" involved a reason that stated that I was being a hypocrite for not posting content when there are other people who posted less and I clearly manifested the intention to post more as soon as I could.
If you think I'm going to be cool and ignore that kind of FAKE reasons you're making a mistake.
------------
So far so good, BUT Alehxans said that Dakarians posts make more sense if he's scum. Why would that be? I may be newbie, that got lynched for initiating the scumhunting in BM5 (good job to efectively leave me without a method for scumhunting!), and now scumhunting is actually considered scummy?
Consider the line where I said that. He claimed that his "vote would stay on me". That is a stubborn position that town should not take. Notice that he after admitted that it was a semi-random vote to get reactions? How is his vote supposed to say because he suggested I didn't post content? (when I said I would post more soon)
Scumhunting is not considered scummy. It's good. But expect your reasons to be countered in a discussion. That's how mafia works.
------------
The mess, though, is that we banged heads in almost the same fashion in bay 12. He got panicky when I attacked him then and got worse as the day went on.
So, yes, the argument he gave is Meh, but it's his personality so for now I'll leave be.
Stop being a condescending woman who sleeps with men for money...
You're far more wrong than I am here because you expect me to fit in your style of play. Consider this a taste of MS style that you have not yet known.
@ExKirby
Buddying noted
"Me Too"ing another's argument, noted.
ok... this is the kind of thing that pisses me off. He is stating that he agrees with something you say. Instead of accusing him of buddying without any further conclusion of how it is and what can it mean you could've asked him what did he particularly agreed and why...
But this shows clearly that you wanna be seen as an active investigator but all you do is throw unsupported, unexplained accusations to use later on.
---------------------------
Now... let's see:
Dakarian: Annoying. Active but throwing random stuff all around and pretending he is right. I don't like him but that doesn't necesarilly mean he is scum. Might prove useful at some point.
Pandarsenic: A lot of well reasoned discussion about wich issue we should choose but practically no scumhunting. He feels town but it would be cool to see him show the S.Holmes in him :S
ExKirby: Talked a lot about censorship. I don't know what he meant about Org and Arch and would like his feelings on both of them clarified. His day shortening request is very anti-town but he may be relying to heavily on PRs.
Kashyyk: 2 posts. One of them voting censorship thinking about what would hurt scum instead of what would help town and the other quoting the mafia wiki and asking for the specific deadline. So far, this is the kind of scummy person that half-way lurks through a game.
Mr.Person: MIA.
Humaan: MIA
Frelock: His argumentations about the issues have been pretty logical and well fundamented. Notices he is focusing too much on the issues and starts scumhunting. I like.
Question to all of those who want censorship liberalized: How do we know that mafia can no benefit from this? As in, reveal abilities for their roles?
ok... b12 is taking too long to load for some reason and I gotta go soon:
I'm still missing this guys:
Rooster: Not much until his comment about my fight with dakarian.
Org:
MagmaDeath:
Bulborish:
unvote (org), Vote Kashhyk. Scum in b12 is mild scum. Mild scum is you.
Author
Topic: LCS Mafia - Game Over - From The Jaws Of Victory - CCS Bastards Win (Read 66366 times)