Toony: "Neruz is scum = scum" ...unexplained vote...what's up with that, Toony?
What's up with that? Cobalt, I can just quote the latest thing he's said and it reeks of scum tells.(snip)
Passive, buddying, manipulative, etc...
Well, it goes like this. Town justifies its votes and accusations. Scum want to basically get anyone lynched, which is harder if you have to justify it- so we go after the people who are not bothering to support their own actions. Either can come back and justify it after the fact, and either can rely on others' reasoning. Scum don't want to come up with reasoning, I think.
...I'm not sure if the wording is good here, but I think I conveyed the idea?
PPE: 7 new replies!
Right back atcha Toony, my friend.
This quote means nothing.
So does this.
Well, um...wow. You two're illustrating my point pretty nicely here.
PPE2: Four new replies.
Dakarian: "reflection" or "bus-drive" on a mafia improved kill is also an option. The list is morel ike your scan-notes- they're written as I read- something interesting comes up, I add it/them to the list. (My conclusion that he was asleep was based on that the last post he made was his last activity) "4 scum total"- that was what I was trying to point out, I guess I didn't make it very clear.
Why is rash less scummy than web...well, the main thrust is that web is the scum that I can see, and rashilul is the maybe-scum that is hiding. I also get the feeling that rashilul is new, though that may mean nothing- and his absences seem to be RL-induced. Rashilul merely seems to have scummy behaviour- not that this isn't something- but Webadict is using scum-reasoning, that is, hypocrisy, to me, and his attacks are strangely weak all over.
Speaking of Webadict, where is he? You out there, buddy?
yeurgh.
Author
Topic: uPick Mafia: Panda Edition Day6 - Mafia wins. Cheeetar calls Shenanigans. (Read 292591 times)