My analysis goes on what I think is off about your explanation. I feel that you are presenting to me and not the crowd. The crowd is we and you're only trying to make me make them believe you're town. That's why I don't like your posts.
Partially correct.
When I argue with a person, I do focus on that person and myself. I'm NOT addressing the town as of yet, though they are content to read it over. However, I'm not trying to convince you that I'm town either. Instead, I'm doing two jobs:
1. Answering your questions and accusations. I have a firm belief that you should answer them even as you are focused elsewhere. It's extremely scummy to dodge a question or not answer to an accusation. Note that it is directly aimed at YOU, not the town, since they are YOUR questions.
Do I try to prove myself town to you? No. I answer them because you ask and I can answer. When you get sick of me always explaining myself to your accusations or answering your questions you can stop sending them to me.
2. Reading you. It's HARD (for me at least) to read someone that is accusing you, but it's still possible while they attack you, and much easier afterwards if you're still around to do so. I'm trying to read you through your posts and see just what kind of motive you have behind the text. As such, it helps me understand you more to continue debating you. That it's you doing the main attacks doesn't change that, in truth.
So yes, it's you and me. If I become SURE that you are scum then you'll see my tone change and my audience expand.
And yes about Meph. There isn't a whole lot to go on.
So why did you expect a 1000 page report on him?
But, the post restriction thing isn't crap. He's obviously not helpful, and likely his role is just a bunch of crap. I'm pretty sure he can speak just fine, and he's only doing it to throw us off. And if he can't his role can't really be considered helpful, since we're playing a game of analyzation and not of "be a stupid a moron."
That's the reason behind the Lurker Hunters as well and, frankly, I find that pure Bullshit.
A townie could be restricted to not post all game and they are still helpful if only because they give us one more lynch before we lose.
For example, with 4 scum, we have 6 mislynches (assuming only the NK and the lynch itself, which is enough for the point I bring). If one person gets modkilled we will be down to 5 mislynches before it's over, with a Nolynch somewhere inbetween. As such, if he's town, then he's one of the reasons why we still have that 6th lynch.
This is why the 'useless townie' lynch is bullshit. It hurts every single person in the town just because you are 'annoyed' by them. If you think he's scum then fine, accuse him, vote for him, get him lynched as scum. If you think he's town, then shut up about it and stop wasting your time and everyone's attention span with your annoyance of him.
... Did you really just say that someone else will explain your vote? Do you have no will? No thought? No soul? Because you're certainly not helpful to your cause. And you ARE trying to convince EVERYONE that the person you're voting for is scum. This isn't random voting if you say I'm scummy but don't say why, and you've certainly made it clear you're not going to say a why, because odds are you don't have a why, now do you? This is likely a test to see who will join you and who will flake. How that's helpful is debatable, but I honestly have better things to deal with than you.
And I never asked you to call me Highness. I won't treat you like a moron if you didn't, ya know, act like one. So, perhaps instead of being a whiney little baby, try stepping up and doing proper analyzing, instead of this WIFOM crap of "Duuuuuuuuh, I think at least one of the town is scum. Duuuuuuh." Yeah, because that's helpful to everyone. Give reasons why.
Now you see? Instead of complaining about mr. 3-words, you could be doing more of this.
Author
Topic: uPick Mafia: Panda Edition Day6 - Mafia wins. Cheeetar calls Shenanigans. (Read 298440 times)