Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9] 10 11 ... 50

Author Topic: Medieval II, Total War in general, discussion time  (Read 73751 times)

Jackrabbit

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Medieval II, Total War in general, discussion time
« Reply #120 on: November 04, 2009, 07:47:58 pm »

best thing about the third age mod?

a full army of mordor catapults also works as cave trolls once they're out of ammo, insta win army

That sounds kind of game breaking.
Logged

KaelGotDwarves

  • Bay Watcher
  • [CREATURE:FIRE_ELF]
    • View Profile
Re: Medieval II, Total War in general, discussion time
« Reply #121 on: November 04, 2009, 07:52:06 pm »

best thing about the third age mod?

a full army of mordor catapults also works as cave trolls once they're out of ammo, insta win army

That sounds kind of game breaking.
yeah, just a smidge.

Those or the elite trolls versus full stack of mumakil. HEAVEN OR HELL LETS ROCK.

Neruz

  • Bay Watcher
  • I see you...
    • View Profile
Re: Medieval II, Total War in general, discussion time
« Reply #123 on: November 05, 2009, 02:04:56 am »

Combat in war is about killing your enemy.  If he was fighting them one on one it means they were also samurai.  Even Miyamoto Musashi himself could barely handle 70 trained swordsmen alone (assuming that story is even true).    Anyway, this whole argument is meaningless since he wasn't fighting them one on one, he was fighting them all at once.  Most likely they were peasant soldiers so they would have just surrounded him and skewered him with their Yari.

Combat in a ritualised society is about winning, winning may or may not have anything to do with killing someone.

And yes, i know the one Samurai holding off an army on a bridge is literally wrong, that's why i said technically right; as in the overall effect of 'one samurai on a bridge delays an entire army' is somewhat correct for the period and location, even though the means through which he did so in the game is incorrect.

If you mean that it was technically correct behavior as laid down by the samurai code of ethics, I can agree.  If you still mean that it was technically realistic like you originally said, you're still wrong for all the reasons already stated.  People who conquer others don't let honor get in the way.  Maybe some minor lord who really didn't stand a chance in the scheme of things would do it, but power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.  Anyone with a large army and somewhere he needed to be would not stop to risk his samurai challenging a lone idiot to single combat.

Seriously dude, you're just betraying your ignorance of Feudal Japan here.

Ioric Kittencuddler

  • Bay Watcher
  • Multiclass Bard/Kitten trainer
    • View Profile
Re: Medieval II, Total War in general, discussion time
« Reply #124 on: November 05, 2009, 02:10:36 am »

Seriously dude, you're just betraying your ignorance of Feudal Japan here.

Look, you wanna give me any solid evidence that Sengoku Era Japan was any different than any other period of constant warfare in history I'll think about believing you, but as it stands I'm going to have to go with what I've got.
Logged
Come see the MOST interesting Twitter account on the internet!  Mine!

Don't worry!  Be happy!  It's the law!

Neruz

  • Bay Watcher
  • I see you...
    • View Profile
Re: Medieval II, Total War in general, discussion time
« Reply #125 on: November 05, 2009, 02:15:44 am »

Seriously dude, you're just betraying your ignorance of Feudal Japan here.

Look, you wanna give me any solid evidence that Sengoku Era Japan was any different than any other period of constant warfare in history I'll think about believing you, but as it stands I'm going to have to go with what I've got.

What?

You're trying to claim warfare throughout the ages, all over the planet, has always been the same?

I have no idea how to respond to that, you have knocked the words out of me.

Ioric Kittencuddler

  • Bay Watcher
  • Multiclass Bard/Kitten trainer
    • View Profile
Re: Medieval II, Total War in general, discussion time
« Reply #126 on: November 05, 2009, 02:19:05 am »

No, I'm stating that throughout any recorded period of constant warefare, people didn't let honor get in the way of winning, or if they did they lost quickly and ended up being insignificant.
Logged
Come see the MOST interesting Twitter account on the internet!  Mine!

Don't worry!  Be happy!  It's the law!

Neruz

  • Bay Watcher
  • I see you...
    • View Profile
Re: Medieval II, Total War in general, discussion time
« Reply #127 on: November 05, 2009, 04:08:10 am »

Which history books have you been reading?

Ioric Kittencuddler

  • Bay Watcher
  • Multiclass Bard/Kitten trainer
    • View Profile
Re: Medieval II, Total War in general, discussion time
« Reply #128 on: November 05, 2009, 05:44:41 am »

Which history books have you been reading?

Well if you need a name, Traditions and Encounters, volumes one and two.  What about you?  And why is it important?
« Last Edit: November 05, 2009, 05:48:14 am by Ioric Kittencuddler »
Logged
Come see the MOST interesting Twitter account on the internet!  Mine!

Don't worry!  Be happy!  It's the law!

Neruz

  • Bay Watcher
  • I see you...
    • View Profile
Re: Medieval II, Total War in general, discussion time
« Reply #129 on: November 05, 2009, 05:55:59 am »

Because your absolute determination that people neer let honour get in the way of victory clashes violently with the history i have learned and been taught; especially history in Japan and, to a lesser degree, the rest of Asia, where combat and life in general became heavily ritualised to the point of rediculousness.

Although even then there were people in feudal era Japan who broke tradition to 'win' so to speak; they were referred to as Ninja.

Jackrabbit

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Medieval II, Total War in general, discussion time
« Reply #130 on: November 05, 2009, 06:04:26 am »

Although even then there were people in feudal era Japan who broke tradition to 'win' so to speak; they were referred to as Ninja.
And they were only called in when someone ruined a tea ceremony.
Logged

Neruz

  • Bay Watcher
  • I see you...
    • View Profile
Re: Medieval II, Total War in general, discussion time
« Reply #131 on: November 05, 2009, 06:13:46 am »

Although even then there were people in feudal era Japan who broke tradition to 'win' so to speak; they were referred to as Ninja.
And they were only called in when someone ruined a tea ceremony.
Hehehe

DJ

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Medieval II, Total War in general, discussion time
« Reply #132 on: November 05, 2009, 07:53:00 am »

What?

You're trying to claim warfare throughout the ages, all over the planet, has always been the same?

I have no idea how to respond to that, you have knocked the words out of me.
War. War never changes.
Logged
Urist, President has immigrated to your fortress!
Urist, President mandates the Dwarven Bill of Rights.

Cue magma.
Ah, the Magma Carta...

Heron TSG

  • Bay Watcher
  • The Seal Goddess
    • View Profile
Logged

Est Sularus Oth Mithas
The Artist Formerly Known as Barbarossa TSG

Jreengus

  • Bay Watcher
  • Si Hoc Legere Scis Nimium Eruditionis Habes
    • View Profile
Re: Medieval II, Total War in general, discussion time
« Reply #134 on: November 05, 2009, 09:32:53 am »

I just got an interesting offer from the Armenians.

Spoiler (click to show/hide)

You'd think that there would be some kind of preset option that does that. Strange that they didn't include it and forced the poor AI to word its request a it did.

The Seleucids get a ridiculously strong start, 2 wonders and a third nearby in rebel hands then their cities make ridiculous amounts of gold immediately. I couldn't stop the ridiculous flow of money even with my capital churning out elephants.
Logged
Oh yeah baby, you know you like it.  Now stop crying and get in my lungs.
Boil your penis. I'm convinced that's how it happened.
My HoM.
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9] 10 11 ... 50