Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Org]

Im still here.

[dakarian]

Note: "i'm here" posts do NOT count for attendance.

No one is voting.

Deadline: Tuesday, 9pm EST

Entire town required to extend.

[Eduren]

Eduren... that is the very definition of passivity.  You must have some idea... surely?  Anything?  Comon, you could at least help us get a day extension or something...

After reviewing the thread, I have this:

Sirbayer: He has not been scumhunting. Whenever he pretends to do so, he is parroting other peoples claims, making mistakes and not following through on suspicions.

So, Webby. Awhile back you said you were "helping [us] form a good mindset about [Leafsnail]." Sounds kind of like you're trying to direct us.

Leafsnail, why ISN'T he dead? WHY DON'T YOU KNOW? YOU SHOULD KNOW THIS THINGS DAMMIT

Web only answered the second part of his post and either forgets the first part, or avoids it. But Bayer never follows it up. Never cares that his question wasn't answered and doesn't even care about the part that was.

Org: He has lurked his way here. He has thrown his vote around all game as if it doesn't mean anything to him. Reacted very angrily first day and has toned it down ever since I pointed it out.



LeafEdit: Why would I be doing that? Don't you think I know how scummy that post made me seem?  I posted it because I felt that you guys needed an explanation.

OrgEdit: That's nice.

[Leafsnail]

Ugh... I've just realised the deadline is in just over 24 hours.  I now have a serious worry - since Dakarian requires a unanimous vote for a Day Extension (which I'll vote for now, by the way) the scum could just lurk and win with a No Lynch.  So, the plan:

Firstly, I suggest everyone votes Day Extension ASAP.
Secondly, SirBayer and Org, we need your full suspicions, and we need them as soon as possible.  I will also ask an additional question: If you were forced to choose now, who would you vote for?  Who is behaving the most scummy, and why?
Thirdly... Eduren's last post has actually changed my opinion of him significantly.  It seems to be a genuine attempt at scumhunting, which is more than can be said for some other user's posts.

[SirBayer]

We had almost no suspicion towards him.

So, Eduren, this doesn't make ANY sense. None at all, especially given the question.

Furthermore, after being accused of avoiding conflict, you almost immediately bring up a number of issues to be answered. Isn't that convenient?

Well... everyone.  You're trying to avoid conflict, possibly in the hope of jumping on someone later on.

Then immediately this last post.

Unvote if necessary, Eduren, the ONLY reason I'm not voting you is because scum might hammer and win.

I'm afraid I dont' have time to cruise back and have a look at stuff, but this is what I have right now, and I'd like answers.

Leafedit: Right. Right now I suspect Eduren, I'd vote for Eduren!

I don't have time to assemble other suspicions. Later ._.

Day Extension.

[Leafsnail]

and I'd like answers.

But you haven't asked any questions!  You've just repeated what I've said and ignored most of my last post...

Ok, I suppose you did ask "Isn't that convenient?", but that doesn't really count.

[dakarian]

2 votes for Extension accepted.  3 more required.

[Org]

Eduren... that is the very definition of passivity.  You must have some idea... surely?  Anything?  Comon, you could at least help us get a day extension or something...

After reviewing the thread, I have this:

Sirbayer: He has not been scumhunting. Whenever he pretends to do so, he is parroting other peoples claims, making mistakes and not following through on suspicions.

So, Webby. Awhile back you said you were "helping [us] form a good mindset about [Leafsnail]." Sounds kind of like you're trying to direct us.

Leafsnail, why ISN'T he dead? WHY DON'T YOU KNOW? YOU SHOULD KNOW THIS THINGS DAMMIT

Web only answered the second part of his post and either forgets the first part, or avoids it. But Bayer never follows it up. Never cares that his question wasn't answered and doesn't even care about the part that was.

Org: He has lurked his way here. He has thrown his vote around all game as if it doesn't mean anything to him. Reacted very angrily first day and has toned it down ever since I pointed it out.



LeafEdit: Why would I be doing that? Don't you think I know how scummy that post made me seem?  I posted it because I felt that you guys needed an explanation.

OrgEdit: That's nice.

Well, maybe if I didnt have two projects due tomorrow, I would be here.

Owait.

My suspicions? You. Still. But Im not sure.

[Eduren]

Extension please.

We had almost no suspicion towards him.

So, Eduren, this doesn't make ANY sense. None at all, especially given the question.

What? It makes total sense. Why would scum get rid of somebody acting suspicious? They want to bring people to lylo that increase the odds of a mislynch. They can do this by making sure the scummiest get there. They killed Pandar because he was the least scrutinized and very likely a good town asset in a lylo situation. Also, look around you. Basically everybody left standing is either suspicious up the wazoo or brain-dead. Thats what they wanted.

Furthermore, after being accused of avoiding conflict, you almost immediately bring up a number of issues to be answered. Isn't that convenient?

Umm, maybe you missed this post:

Ok, since I have really dropped the ball, it is time to do some scanning. So, brb.

in which I stated my intentions to re-scan the thread. The post that you call "convenient" were merely the results.

Are you even going to acknowledge my points against you? Let alone provide explanations?


Leafsnail: you have been gunning for me since Day 2. Was my post really that much of a turn-around?

[webadict]

Permanent Extension

[dakarian]

4 Extensions requested.  1 more required.

No, I will not accept a permanent Extension.  I WILL let the extensions last for longer IF there's plenty of discussion outside of the requests.

Right now, the extension requests are almost what is keeping everyone going .

[webadict]

4 Extensions requested.  1 more required.

No, I will not accept a permanent Extension.  I WILL let the extensions last for longer IF there's plenty of discussion outside of the requests.

Right now, the extension requests are almost what is keeping everyone going .

That's because if we don't extend, we'll lose.

[webadict]

Eduren... that is the very definition of passivity.  You must have some idea... surely?  Anything?  Comon, you could at least help us get a day extension or something...

After reviewing the thread, I have this:

Sirbayer: He has not been scumhunting. Whenever he pretends to do so, he is parroting other peoples claims, making mistakes and not following through on suspicions.

So, Webby. Awhile back you said you were "helping [us] form a good mindset about [Leafsnail]." Sounds kind of like you're trying to direct us.

Leafsnail, why ISN'T he dead? WHY DON'T YOU KNOW? YOU SHOULD KNOW THIS THINGS DAMMIT

Web only answered the second part of his post and either forgets the first part, or avoids it. But Bayer never follows it up. Never cares that his question wasn't answered and doesn't even care about the part that was.

Org: He has lurked his way here. He has thrown his vote around all game as if it doesn't mean anything to him. Reacted very angrily first day and has toned it down ever since I pointed it out.



LeafEdit: Why would I be doing that? Don't you think I know how scummy that post made me seem?  I posted it because I felt that you guys needed an explanation.

OrgEdit: That's nice.

There's no first question to that quote. The entirety of the question in reference is aimed entirely at Leafsnail, and my attempt to answer it is only because I felt the need to do so. Don't use crappy arguments. The first part is, essentially, an observation. I'm surprised you missed the fact that Leafsnail didn't answer the question. Or that you failed to observe Leafsnail at all.

[webadict]

Just so everyone knows, there's a major pattern going on with the kills, except for the very first kill. ToonyMan was killed initially, which I'm confused about.

Given the Night Kills:
ToonyMan (N1)
Vector (N2)
Pandarsenic (N3)

While it's fairly noticeable, each of those kills were against the most active payers. The first kill, however, was not (While I consider ToonyMan active, I don't think he's the most), which is confusing, considering I'd start with Vector, Pandarsenic, or me first (Especially with a dead Doc.) So, why did they kill ToonyMan first? His only suspicions were against me after all.

Honestly, I'm going to put this one out there: I'm slowly being framed. Whoever is doing it is being a real pansy about it, too. And a terrible job, too. I'm really waiting for someone to accuse me, and no one has done it yet, because I know they're all afraid I'm the Cop.

So, let's start talking everyone. Do you think I'm trying to make you lose? What do you all think? You're all very quiet.

[Eduren]

There's no first question to that quote. The entirety of the question in reference is aimed entirely at Leafsnail, and my attempt to answer it is only because I felt the need to do so. Don't use crappy arguments. The first part is, essentially, an observation. I'm surprised you missed the fact that Leafsnail didn't answer the question. Or that you failed to observe Leafsnail at all.

Well the way he said it it seemed that he wanted a response to it. Which is why it seems weird that he didn't care about getting one.