So, I figure I might as well amend your little list, because once again you're falling into your old trap.
Since I haven't played with Bayer much, what is the trap you are referring to?
Org: Okay, actual questions. You reacted rather caustically to dirtybirdy's flawed accusations, something I've never seen you do. So what is the reason for your reaction?
Edit: It's not driving me crazy, just bugging me. I'm mostly wondering what your standards are for participation. But you can help me by answering this (In retrospect, maybe I shouldn't have spoilered it).
1. SirBayer's trap is that he will follow advanced players who don't look particularly scummy without question. Hence calling him a sheep a couple of pages back. I'm noting now that he's suddenly picked up my accusational speech-pattern from BMIV. As he says, it's unintentional, but I'm wondering if it's because his lower-down mental processes are attempting to figure out how you play good scum, and I'm the only person around that he knows to imprint off of.
</long-windedness>
2. Org has been pretending to be ANGRY WEBADICT recently. Saw him doing it extensively in BMIV (again. Sorry for heavily using that as a reference, but it's a game that 3 of us just finished, so I figure it's applicable). Same attacking style, etc, whereas scum-Org just sits back and relaxes. That's where my analysis of his meta comes from.
3. Sorry for not answering your question--you're right, I completely forgot about it. I actually can't fully remember what "he" refers to, either, but I think it was Leafsnail.
4. I think my analysis of your lack of participation was flawed; I'm seeing some questioning, but not much conclusioning/analysis, so I think I forgot about your posts. Anyway, I'm still really sorry about that, and will play closer attention in the future.