Please people. Remain serious.
And use logically valid arguments.
Atoms are not sentient and neighter are one cell bodies.
And here we are with a discussion about something misunderstood - hierarchy in anarchism.
Anarchy is a lack of governments and units in power,
not lack of groups whatsoever.
Hence there would be no sense to existance of feminism-anarchism, syndicat-anarchism, and socialism-anarchism.
(we) Anarchists instead of focusing on large groups of government rely on small groups, like a local group of people or a family. The concept of anarchy doesn't work quite like most think it does on families and (heh) animal packs. In my point of view animals have laws and certain behaviours that are similar to ours in many aspects. Gorillas wage wars and make friend, and form groups. Ants have an overmind queen that controls all. But as a human being I require freedom.
What is freedom? Is it allowing everybody to do everything? Like killing everything moving just because you can? No. We humans have common sense, and we should trust each other that we won't break loose like a maniac. Of course it happens butsuch situations can be dealt with.
With freedom comes responsibility. You are free to do whatever you please, but you accept consequences.
Animals don't have a political form of government on a large scale, so comparing them with humans isn't quite reasonable in the long run. Animals never form packs larger than they can manage. We humans do. And it can drive some insane.
If there's any animals who embrace anarchy, I haven't heard of them and that sort of shows you why the system isn't exactly admirable.
Need help? Any bird. They only form small groups and in those groups there is competition for food and females, but besides that there is not much else. Behaviour varies from species to species, but it's not that different.
Author
Topic: Adolf Hitler cake stress reliever or discussion about anarchy (Read 2819 times)