In the least, I know you aren't messing up your information. The mentality of bastardly/nonbastardly was a little different though:
When the day started and I put together the Sane Cop that was lynched, the mafioso that was the only nightkill, and the role PM that just happened to hit the second mafia with a 'so obvious' I thought "something's off here.. it has to be". Thus my first post. Since I dislike sitting around doing nothing, I decided to scumhunt in the meanwhile, holding my investigation until I had a better idea.
Two things helped ease out my claim: Yes, you were part of it. I suspect you, I don't ignore you. My 'ignore' point usually kicks in when I'm asking everyone around to join in lynching you. The other was Janus claiming the kill. That both calmed my suspicions on him for the time and helped explain what happened last night.
So when I claimed, I thought it had a good chance of being unbastardly. Thus I claimed and, later, opted to off myself since that would either eliminate a mafia or prove that the role names aren't trustworthy. Toony's explanations made that moot.
That's what happened. Janus has an alibi that may need to be traced later. You seem Bloodthirsty pro-town so far based on the analysis. I'm either Paranoid, Sane, Insane, or Random.
Sidenote: you haven't started tunnelvisioning.
And Cheeetar
I've got an idea. This may be incredibly stupid, so point out if it is. We could lynch Dakarian, revealing his roles true abilities. If he is a scum lieing about Webadict being scum, a scum is lynched. If he is a true rolecop with no madness, we then lynch Webadict afterwards and get scum. My idea fails somewhat if he turns out to be a paranoid/naive cop.
You know, I normally hated the 'deflection' argument. I believe that, even under direct attack, a townie should always be aggressive and going after others. Thus their posts will have some defense as they try to deal with the accusations and some attack as they continue their scumhunt.
So thank you, thank you Cheeetar, for showing me just exactly what a true Deflection looks like. You don't defend, you don't answer to accusations, you just "suddenly" had an "idea so crazy it may work!" that involves me being dead.
A few problems:
1. I already came up with that idea
2. I already found out that it wouldn't work without me dying
3. Question Dodging and Deflection noted
I'm just about done with you now.
You were passive most of Day 1, simply joining bandwagons using other people's arguments and providing no content for yourself.
You were the 4th vote on Nihilist's bandwagon: a scumtell. Before you cry 'old broken scumtell', Pandarsenic KNEW about the tell and still ended up 3rd on the same bandwagon.
You lurker hunt WELL past the point of normal lurker hunting. I'll leave off the vote for someone not playing, since really it's not hard to get games confused. What I WILL focus on, though, is that you hunted a lurker to their death and, when done, continued to lurker hunt. Lurker hunting is easy, gets a good bit of popularity, and dispels some of the risk of lynching since "they were useless anyway".
You were in lockstep with Pandar for a good bit of D1: voting 4th to his 3rd in Nihlists' bandwagon and voting 2nd to his 1st on Archangel's lurkerlynch. You also jumped in when he and Web were at it.
Yet while your hands were buddies with Pandar, your mouth pretended he didn't exist. You barely mention him and never attack him even when you casually lump him as scum during the Bus claim.
The image of two people, never looking at each other, walking side by side in the same direction. When you see that, you KNOW they know each other, but don't want people to realize they do.
And now you question dodge and deflect the conversation to an old subject that, if you were paying attention instead of just frantically glancing for something to help you, was already brought up and rejected.
I'm VERY close to being done with you.
Author
Topic: Toon Mafia V - Day 5 - GAMEOVER (Read 59242 times)