For example, going back to Rysith, your day 1 does bug me the more that I look. You didn't do much of ANYTHING then, just a randomvote, then way later a jump on webadict for some ugly 'post ratio' mess (made extra ugly by not actually posting a fact on it.. if you claim 'ratios' then post a real ratio) and, after ONE post attacking him, you claim tunnelvision and run away.
I claimed you were bloodthirsty-a pro-town mentality-but you didn't even start doing anything until Day 2. Now, your day 2 is pretty well off but now you look like a different person going from D1 to D2. What's up?
Mostly, it's that I'm really bad and doing anything D1 without anything to go on, and so I tend to lurk through it, and go back to what happened then to correlate with what happens in future days. Day two has more stuff for me to do actual analysis on, so I am able to be much more active. I still stand by my "tunnelvision as an internal phenomenon" explanation.
The reason that I don't trust Cheeetar's claim is that in order for him to win D6, he would either have to ensure that mafia and town were kept in balance (so d6 dawned 2 town/1 scum), or get us to NL at least once. That Janus had an extra kill means that for Cheeetar to win, we actually have to NL at least once (which is bad for the town). That Cheeetar wasn't pushing for NL D1 (which is a strategy that might work) makes me doubt the win condition.
And, obviously, Leafsnail is scum. Duh.
Using Webadict's logic, Cheeetar and Leafsnail accuse him of lurking and he immediately points off at Leafsnail as someone who's obviously scummy.