Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[JanusTwoface]

I actually meant private investigations.  I'm hoping there aren't too many roles that publicly announce the result of investigations.

unvote

eduren, what about you?  (Same question, private investigations)

[Eduren]

Well, I would probably investigate Leafsnail's alignment because I can never get a good read on him. As for role, I'd probably do that on anybody and hope I hit on something interesting.

[Leafsnail]

I'm hoping there aren't too many roles that publicly announce the result of investigations.

Such a role would basically be a vig, and it sounds just like the sortof thing that would happen in Toony mafia .  I know it's a cliche, but I'd personally investigate webadict, since he's hard to get a read on, and someone subbing in can be extra hard to read.

[webadict]

Janus, by investigate I assume you mean night-kill because of everyone saying that investigate would publicly announce and mod-kill them. I would go for Archangel, because he's been lurking heaps. If, however, investigations weren't publicly announced, I would go for Apostolic Nihilist for alignment because of the strange way he started conversation (admitting to rolefishing) and go for Webadict for role, just in case.
Also, I'll unvote Apostolic Nihilist now that I know what he was doing and vote Archangel for lurking.

STOP UNVOTING LIKE THAT!

[dakarian]

Pandar.. why is it that you've come in to bandwagon TWICE in a row?

First jumping on an attack that, the second I even question, you fall back on, and now you're in on the AN bandwagon.  Even more, so, you aren't even questioning anyone, just voting and walking away.

Pandarsenic, did you just roll up scum again? 

[Pandarsenic]

I don't look at how many votes people have before I vote, douchecock. That's what scum would do. Also, I'm not sure I buy AN's thing about "stimulating discussion." Rolefishing is rolefishing in any context.

[Cheeetar]

Stop unvoting like what, Webadict?

[webadict]

Stop unvoting like what, Webadict?

By HIGHLIGHTING the person you're voting for.

You highlight the Unvote part.

[Cheeetar]

Oh. Sorry about that.

[Archangel]

Sorry everyone. I've got a virus of some sort and am not up to playing right now, but should be better soon. For the moment, I will just unvote.

[dakarian]

I don't look at how many votes people have before I vote, douchecock. That's what scum would do. Also, I'm not sure I buy AN's thing about "stimulating discussion." Rolefishing is rolefishing in any context.

Do you also lose your cool THAT easily as town? 

Also do you ride other people's battles as town as well?

[ToonyMan]

VOTE COUNT:

dakarian(Toony?) - eduren [1]
Archangel - NUKE9.13, Cheeetar [2]
Apostolic Nihilist - Leafsnail, Webadict, Pandarsenic [3]
NUKE9.13 - Twiggie [1]
Webadict - Vector [1]
Twiggie - Apostolic Nihilist [1]
JanusTwoFace - Rysith [1] (sorry bud)
Pandarsenic - dakarian [1]


Not Voting - JanusTwoFace, Archangel [2]

~Day End Wednesday 8 PM EST~

[webadict]

Sorry everyone. I've got a virus of some sort and am not up to playing right now, but should be better soon. For the moment, I will just unvote.

... So... what?

[Apostolic Nihilist]

...Does no one else find Twiggie's lack of posting strange? I'm especially confused as to why he directly evaded my prior questions.

Anyways, Pandarsenic seemed a bit quick to jump on me for 'being dumb', but that's quite expected. I'm wondering why he thinks 'asking questions' is a waste of time, though...

I'm unvoting Twiggie because, well, he's not scum. Lynching him is bad for us, etc. I only voted him in the first place to draw his attention to my questions (which clearly failed).

[Twiggie]

bwahaha my evil plan of doom worked!

yeah, anyway im not scum.
FoS pandar for massive overreaction and leafsnail for being overly specific. i vote we off him if it turns out he was right.