Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Author Topic: EASY two layer aquifer method  (Read 601 times)

cyclotis04

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
EASY two layer aquifer method
« on: October 21, 2009, 03:30:34 pm »

I've found an excellent way to tunnel through two layers of aquifer with collapsed caverns. Is this a bug or a feature? I haven't seen anything listing this as a valid method for burrowing through two layer aquifers, but it seems to work for me. This seems much simpler than the method described here: http://www.bay12games.com/forum/index.php?topic=31651.0

My method:

Starting from the top left, moving chronologically to the right, and vertically downwards.
Spoiler (click to show/hide)
(I think the picture is pretty self-explanatory, but ask if you have questions.)
Logged

Jim Groovester

  • Bay Watcher
  • 1P
    • View Profile
Re: EASY two layer aquifer method
« Reply #1 on: October 21, 2009, 03:42:48 pm »

Uhh, it's not that clear.

Could you provide some more explanation? From the looks of it, you penetrated two layers of aquifer with one chunk of soil, but I'm not entirely certain how.
Logged
I understood nothing, contributed nothing, but still got to win, so good game everybody else.

cyclotis04

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: EASY two layer aquifer method
« Reply #2 on: October 21, 2009, 03:49:02 pm »

I dropped a chunk of earth (floor, layer, floor) into a channeled out square of aquifer, penetrating it, and the layer beneath it. A single 5x5 chunk dropped into a 5x5 channel plugged a 5x5 area of the first aquifer, and a 7x7 area of the second aquifer. I'm not sure how better to explain it than with the picture... What is it that you don't get? (Besides the physics of it - that's why I'm asking.)
Logged

Jim Groovester

  • Bay Watcher
  • 1P
    • View Profile
Re: EASY two layer aquifer method
« Reply #3 on: October 21, 2009, 03:55:37 pm »

I see what's going on.

I think you only penetrated a single layer aquifer, but it's easy to see why you might think there are two.

Aquifers leak on their own level, and they leak onto the level below them, thus giving the appearance of two damp layers. This explains why that single 5x5 chunk of soil plugged the aquifer and thus prevented any leaking onto the level below.
Logged
I understood nothing, contributed nothing, but still got to win, so good game everybody else.

cyclotis04

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: EASY two layer aquifer method
« Reply #4 on: October 21, 2009, 04:02:59 pm »

Then why does the red clay flood when I dig it out? (Very bottom right picture.) Also, when I ramp up into the red clay, from the layer below, it begins to flood, even in an area untouched from the collapse. Do I just not understand aquifers? Does a single aquifer create two layers that I can't dig in?
Logged

Jim Groovester

  • Bay Watcher
  • 1P
    • View Profile
Re: EASY two layer aquifer method
« Reply #5 on: October 21, 2009, 04:05:48 pm »

Aquifers leak into the level below them. So yes, it basically does create two layers you can't dig in.

It's something annoying about them you have to keep in mind.
Logged
I understood nothing, contributed nothing, but still got to win, so good game everybody else.

Albedo

  • Bay Watcher
  • Menacing with spikes of curmudgeonite.
    • View Profile
Re: EASY two layer aquifer method
« Reply #6 on: October 21, 2009, 04:08:10 pm »

(bah - ninja'd!)  :D

Yes, you just do not understand aquifers.  (But it seems you're close to doing so...)

JG answered that...

and they leak onto the level below them, thus giving the appearance of two damp layers.

A one-level aquifer has water on TWO levels - the level it's on, and the level below that.  But, if you can seal that one level (as you have done), it's fixed.
Logged

cyclotis04

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: EASY two layer aquifer method
« Reply #7 on: October 21, 2009, 04:09:24 pm »

Huh. That's unfortunate. I thought for sure that I'd dug right below an aquifer before. I thought I understood them better. *shrugs* Sorry for the false alarm.
Logged