quote:
Originally posted by teabing:
<STRONG>can't we just accept that the dwarven philosopher, like many before him, is nothing but a useless lazy bum that poses as a noble to make a living?</STRONG>
Philosophers served a purpose in the ancient world; it's just that, nowadays, most of those purposes have been taken over by more specific, rigorous areas of study.
Most of our intellectual disciplines were philosophies before they were hard sciences, though. Modern theories of economics were put together by philosophers before there was a proper field of economic studies. Modern psychology was nothing more than philosophizing, before it was understood well enough to become a field in its own right. Modern systems of government were devised by philosophers. Our modern system of rigorous science was originally devised by natural philosophers. And so on.
The philosopher in Dwarf Fortress would, in my mind, be the noble whose job it is to think about how the fortress should be, in a broader sense. The bookkeeper worries about whether or not you should have enough coins, but the philosopher worries about whether or not you should be using coins in the first place.
The concrete benefits of the philosopher could, in the long run, be to let you change the overall society of your fortress; think Social Engineering from Alpha Centauri. They could let you change or eliminate your economic system, change or eliminate your standards of corporal punishment, devise new systems of government with advantages and disadvantages, and so on.
Of course, these changes could cause revolutions and counter-revolutions, with angry dwarves going berserk because they dislike the changes, or want more radical changes, or whatever.
[ December 09, 2007: Message edited by: Aquillion ]